What's new

Watch Tejas stun Malaysian audience in Lima 2019

That is not for me to provide...It is for you to find coz you people are claiming the opposite so you need to provide the proof for the opposite!

https://thewire.in/security/india-pakistan-f-16-balakot

https://www.business-standard.com/a...-shooting-down-pak-s-f-16-119040500195_1.html

https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2019/04/05/world/asia/05reuters-india-kashmir-pakistan-f16.html

I am sure all these journalists read this report...After all isnt that how foreign journalism works?

Unlike, secretive IAF undisclosed claims ....which cant be produced...but indians have no problem believing that lolz

LOL.

So Basically you are admitting YOU HAVE NO PROOF of your claim.

Only some news report from "unnamed defense officials" :cheesy:

Sounds totally Legit.
 
No doubt they were stun, after seeing a FLYING jet coming on a TRUCK...!!!:laughcry:
 
LOL.

So Basically you are admitting YOU HAVE NO PROOF of your claim.

Only some news report from "unnamed defense officials" :cheesy:

Sounds totally Legit.
Unnamed officials told foreign policy magazine [not desi liars who have to win an election] ....unnamed defence officials are better than "secretive and tailored" indian lies
 
SO where is that "Report" from the "international committee" ? Provide the LINK.

You can't, can you ? :lol:

True, they post some report quoting US committee report but they can not quote that original report. Where is that report?
 
Here maybe you should attack this guy:
Vipin Narang

Vipin Narang, an associate professor of political science at MIT, said the way the events have unfolded may affect India’s efforts to deter Pakistan in the future.

“As details come out, it looks worse and worse for the Indians,” Narang said. “It looks increasingly like India failed to impose significant costs on Pakistan, but lost a plane and a helicopter of its own in the process.”

https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/04/04/did-india-shoot-down-a-pakistani-jet-u-s-count-says-no/

an indian associate prof for MIT is himself convinced...Now, you can prob email him for what he read that convinced him so much and is acceptable over IAF official BREAKING NEWS?!

So why do you need French planes if you already have F16 destroyers proven? :pop:
 
Unnamed officials told foreign policy magazine [not desi liars who have to win an election] ....unnamed defence officials are better than "secretive and tailored" indian lies

Maybe, but definitely not better than the IAF and the Govt. of India :lol:

True, they post some report quoting US committee report but they can not quote that original report. Where is that report?

LOL.... What Report ?

All they have is a "News" of "some report" claimed by "unnamed defense official" :lol:
 
Maybe, but definitely not better than the IAF and the Govt. of India :lol:



LOL.... What Report ?

All they have is a "News" of "some report" claimed by "unnamed defense official" :lol:
Well, all indian media is talking about is that...Plus Modi himself said how can you fight F16 with out RAPAEL?
 
Here maybe you should attack this guy:
Vipin Narang

Vipin Narang, an associate professor of political science at MIT, said the way the events have unfolded may affect India’s efforts to deter Pakistan in the future.

“As details come out, it looks worse and worse for the Indians,” Narang said. “It looks increasingly like India failed to impose significant costs on Pakistan, but lost a plane and a helicopter of its own in the process.”

https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/04/04/did-india-shoot-down-a-pakistani-jet-u-s-count-says-no/

an indian associate prof for MIT is himself convinced...Now, you can prob email him for what he read that convinced him so much and is acceptable over IAF official BREAKING NEWS?!

So why do you need French planes if you already have F16 destroyers proven? :pop:

LOL.... Why should I attack a random guy for having an OPINION ? :cheesy:
 
but lost a plane and a helicopter of its own in the process," he said.

Now if this is to be believed, DGISPR 's claim that two Indian planes were shot down proves to be wrong. We too accept that one plane was shot down and one chopper crashed but what about Su 30 being shot down. Since you have quoted this reference, I think now you have to accept this.
 
Back
Top Bottom