What's new

‘Vishvas’: A word that threatens Pakistan

ALOK31

BANNED
Joined
Jan 18, 2012
Messages
572
Reaction score
0
vishvas-a-word-that-threatens-pakistan

Scandal: Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf recently told the Supreme Court: “Mujh par vishvas karen”. By “vishvas” he meant ‘trust’; he wanted the Court to trust his sincerity.
TV channels immediately reacted. Intellectually-challenged actor Shaan spent time making fun of the prime minister who used the Hindi word. Others followed suit. An article titled “A silent invasion” appeared in The News (September 3) lamenting Indian culture’s invasion to destroy Pakistan’s ideology. The word ‘vishvas’ was the missile that would do the trick.
It went on: “Raja’s choice of Hindi vocabulary… is symptomatic of a creeping cultural penetration of Pakistan by our eastern neighbour. This silent invasion is taking place mainly through the opening of Pakistan to cheap Bollywood movies, Indian TV entertainment, DVDs and videos of Indian films and, most insidious of all, the home-screening of popular children’s programmes, especially cartoons, dubbed in Hindi.”
Naively, the article refers to France not encouraging the use of English words but it forgets France, when it recommends a ban on all TV and cinema plus DVD home projections of this ‘cultural invasion’. The intelligence agencies, fired by their perceptions of Indian danger, have always said what the article discussed. Somehow, the cultural invasion by America through cinema, TV and restaurants does not affect our spooks.
America’s soft power has bothered many but no one curtails freedom as a weapon to thwart it. Now Indian soft power irks Pakistan, although it does not disturb Central Asia and Africa where this ‘slow invasion’ is also proceeding apace. Shall we curtail our freedom through police action to secure the country against Indian culture?
Pakistan doesn’t know how to respond to challenges based on culture. A number of things have happened over the past years because of this refusal or inability to understand culture as a value in human life. The people have been forced to look for entertainment on their own because the concept of entertainment cannot be discussed in Pakistan without inviting the restrictive maximalism of the clergy.
After 1947, culture was what joined Pakistan with India. Pakistan has killed culture to face India more effectively in the battlefield. Two contaminations are to be fought. The first is the local accretions that Islam suffered when the Muslims were ruling India; the second is the entertainment that comes across the border in all manner of ways.
When Pakistani singers, musicians, actors, cricketers, commentators and some writers go to India, the Indians pay them good money for Pakistan’s ‘slow invasion’. Nor are they upset by the dominance of Persianised Urdu in Bollywood songs. Indians, in fact, buy glossaries to make sense of Urdu words in them. Instead of using this as Pakistan’s ‘soft power’, some writers want the door in Pakistan shut to regional culture. Bangladesh and Sri Lanka are strangely not bothered about India’s ‘slow invasion’.

‘Vishvas’ in my Monnier-Williams Sanskrit Dictionary literally means “breathing freely” (trust). It gets abbreviated as ‘svas’ and appears in Hindi as ‘svast’ (healthy). Another more familiar derivation is swastika (auspicious). Punjabi has its abbreviation from ‘vishvas’: ‘vasah’. The above article in The News would accept ‘bharosa’ for trust, not knowing that ‘bharosa’ is actually ‘bharvasah’, directly taken from ‘vishvasah’. ‘Vishv’ (full) and ‘bhar’ (full) mark the transition here.
Maulvi Muhammad Hussain Azad in his Sukhandan-e-Fars twins Persian and Sanskrit as sister languages. Iran, too, has its soft power over Pakistan, but with India, the linguistic co-extension bothers the Pakistani ideologue, who sees survival of the state only as a steadily self-curtailing entity, already being nibbled away by the culture-hating Taliban.


http://tribune.com.pk/story/438587/vishvas-a-word-that-threatens-pakistan/
 
.
that's not important. You should keep in mind that now new Hindi (not oldest) have alot of words of Urdu but we never claim about all these. Indian Media use various words from the language of Urdu... Don't be narrow - minded, languages are mutual heritages, all these are the parts of our culture, whether we speak, Urdu, Bangali, Hindi, Memoni, etc. All of these are the heritages of sub - continent and I think India is the major part of sub - continent. The quote of Mr. Abdul Kalam is marvelous but strength is not established by weapons and nuclear missiles. the factor of strength is present in people, in societies, in faiths, in history... India have a huge community of Muslims, but we never claims that why they don't speak Urdu...
 
. . .
that's not important. You should keep in mind that now new Hindi (not oldest) have alot of words of Urdu but we never claim about all these. Indian Media use various words from the language of Urdu... Don't be narrow - minded, languages are mutual heritages, all these are the parts of our culture, whether we speak, Urdu, Bangali, Hindi, Memoni, etc. All of these are the heritages of sub - continent and I think India is the major part of sub - continent. The quote of Mr. Abdul Kalam is marvelous but strength is not established by weapons and nuclear missiles. the factor of strength is present in people, in societies, in faiths, in history... India have a huge community of Muslims, but we never claims that why they don't speak Urdu...

well said....I know how I speak my mother tongue..so agreed, that's not important...how effectively you convey the message is what matters..
 
.
It's not important that he used a Hindi word, it's important that as the PM of Pakistan, he is unable to speak the national language properly. I am quite well versed in a number of regional and international languages but when speaking in Urdu, I try my utmost to deliver the entire dialogue in pure and unadulterated Urdu, in respect to the national language.
 
. .
I find it funny that media that is raising questions plays Hindi songs in many programs. (seen few news footage). As for cultural invasion, aren't Bollywood songs, Indian TV-shows are more prevalent and should be brought to attention which is affecting millions of common Pakistani rather than one Pakistani (used by Prime Minister, debatable as he represent the govt. elected by people).

that's not important. You should keep in mind that now new Hindi (not oldest) have alot of words of Urdu but we never claim about all these. Indian Media use various words from the language of Urdu... Don't be ...................
Very well said.
 
.
It's not important that he used a Hindi word, it's important that as the PM of Pakistan, he is unable to speak the national language properly. I am quite well versed in a number of regional and international languages but when speaking in Urdu, I try my utmost to deliver the entire dialogue in pure and unadulterated Urdu, in respect to the national language.

Neither could Benazir or her father (some would add Nawaz Sharif, Ghulam Ishaq and Fazal Elahi to that group too).
 
. .
Eh baba, jab dekho tu tu main main karte rehte ho. ab language pe bhi shuru ho gaye :angry: i am from andhra and the way my mother tongue telugu is absolutely murdered by TV anchors is excruciating. em cheppali ? kya bolna jee .... me bheja utar rahe (hyderabadi istyle)
 
.
It's not important that he used a Hindi word, it's important that as the PM of Pakistan, he is unable to speak the national language properly. I am quite well versed in a number of regional and international languages but when speaking in Urdu, I try my utmost to deliver the entire dialogue in pure and unadulterated Urdu, in respect to the national language.

Our PM and President sikh and hindu respectively don’t speak in Hindi..PM who is Sikh can atleast speak few good hindi lines but our begali hindu president, guess he himself feels that when he speaks in hindi he actually insults that language so he prefers to speak in english...so not a big deal....! ..we are not lucky ppl like US or UK who have to master only one lang....in India average ppl speak/understand atleast 3 langs..
 
.
It's not important that he used a Hindi word, it's important that as the PM of Pakistan, he is unable to speak the national language properly. I am quite well versed in a number of regional and international languages but when speaking in Urdu, I try my utmost to deliver the entire dialogue in pure and unadulterated Urdu, in respect to the national language.

i agree with u 100% that national language should be respected
but this is not just one case i have seen it many times that many Pakistanis r just getting paranoid at times when someone speaks even a single word of hindi n just as in the above case the whole original argument is dropped n the a new argument starts about cultural Invasion by India

whereas in India many Hindus do speak a lot of Urdu words and many Muslims also speak Hindi words in day to day routine but i never heard anybody making a fuse out of it...
 
.
It's not important that he used a Hindi word, it's important that as the PM of Pakistan, he is unable to speak the national language properly. I am quite well versed in a number of regional and international languages but when speaking in Urdu, I try my utmost to deliver the entire dialogue in pure and unadulterated Urdu, in respect to the national language.

True enough. But Urdu itself is an amalgam to start with. So we even have to start with wondering what on earth is a "pure and unadulterated" language in the sub-continental region. :P

Let us take as an example a word tafawat. It is used in two Indian languages (not Hindi, I may add); in one it is pronounced as it is, while in the other its slight altered/abbreviated in pronunciation. Do those languages become less "pure" then? :)
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom