Raider 21
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2016
- Messages
- 3,324
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
That is a Mirage 2000 you dimwit....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is a Mirage 2000 you dimwit....
Sadly he is seeing a wonderful airframe but an utterly failed project.
In time, teenage nationalists like you will accept the truth.Only the Pakistanis think that considering there is extremely limited scale and scope for aircraft R&D in Pakistan and hence the lack of experience in such subjects, hence the trash talk.
Only Mk1 "failed", which is pretty normal for many other aircraft. That's why in time, everybody talks about the F-15C, Gripen C, JF-17 Block 2, J-10B/C, and not F-15A, Gripen A, JF-17 Block 1, J-10A etc.
The difference is we wait for a platform to mature before we induct it, that's just being smart.
In time, teenage nationalists like you will accept the truth.
different philosophy behind both jet projects, your IAF wants a complete product, whereas our JF-17 project to replace Mirages and F-7/PG as early as possible with gradual to Block 1,2,3,4Understand that your country has inducted JF 17 before it achieved many operational capabilities and allowed the platform to gain them while its in service,whereas in India's case airforce waited until the capabilities were gained. The "inducted "time of JF 17 isnt much of an advantage when u compare it with Tejas.
In time, teenage nationalists like you will accept the truth.
different philosophy behind both jet projects, your IAF wants a complete product, whereas our JF-17 project to replace Mirages and F-7/PG as early as possible with gradual to Block 1,2,3,4
Sadly he is seeing a wonderful airframe but an utterly failed project.
Maybe Hindu fcuking terrorts.Did Pakistan delivered JF-17 to Myanmar ? Will be interesting to see Myanmar using this Ground strike proven jet to take out Rohingya Terrorist
yes sir you're on the spot but we are also trying to establish aeronautical/aviation industries with JF-17, we are manufacturing 58% fuselage parts at home like Nosecone, wings horizontal and vertical tails and some of its avionics, rest is China's responsibiltiesThats it, Jf-17 covers the need of the hour of PAF, which is to be a backbone for the airforce, whereas in India's case there is still time, and the emphasis can be given on the domestic capability building.
ppl often go by when the project was started they deliberately miss the fact that strong focus was given only during the last 5-10 years. The project had come to a standstill post nuclear tests and budgetary constraints ended up pushing the project onto the back burner.Only the Pakistanis think that considering there is extremely limited scale and scope for aircraft R&D in Pakistan and hence the lack of experience in such subjects, hence the trash talk.
Only Mk1 "failed", which is pretty normal for many other aircraft. That's why in time, everybody talks about the F-15C, Gripen C, JF-17 Block 2, J-10B/C, and not F-15A, Gripen A, JF-17 Block 1, J-10A etc.
The difference is we wait for a platform to mature before we induct it, that's just being smart.
exactly, it is the same case with ISRO as well. Build a strong local industry which help in sourcing the components. Remember even russia refused cryogenic technology under pressure but now we have now started mastering it. If we master the the jet engine part then we are nearly there. It is just a matter of time & perseverance.emphasis can be given on the domestic capability building.
as you were waiting for that $hit to feed your tummy ?