Oh really? Lets have a "look", compared to Babur, YJ-62:
-has different dimensions
-has a fixed and larger inlet
-has tail fins present farther from exhaust
-has a cruising speed of 0.9 mach
-has half the range of Babur
-is primarily an anti-ship missile with a radar seeker
-is not designed to be launched vertically
-does not have DSMAC/TERCOM
And guess what genius, Pakistan Navy ordered 120 YJ-62s back in 2009. Now why would we do that if we already had "license-production"?
And on top of all that, want to enlighten us all that how exactly did Pakistan make a much better "licensed-production" cruise missile than YJ-62 itself? This must put Chinese reverse-engineering to shame, no?
Atleast learn to differentiate between Babur and Ra'ad before raising allegations.
Ra'ad has such tail configuration because PAF had been satisfied with the performance of the same tail-design on H-2 (South African Raptor-I/II) stand-off munition, which was license-produced by NESCOM.
I gave you the link myself which says its Ra'ad, so its all assumed to be a typo logically.
Now when I gave a link means its not an allegation, its a fact (In yr own words) by saying; PAF had been satisfied