That still within reach and touch of DF21s
It might get difficult if Murican carrier hide in Frisco Bay or Hudson Bay
Did I say it is one sided? But who do you think gains the most, the side with the actual combat experience, or the side without?
Who has the most SIGINT experience? US or China?
I posted elsewhere here where the J-20's RCS, and others, are probably figured out. See if you can find it.Anyway, even with all of that. Taiwan island still cannot detect J-20 Stealth Fighter patrolling their Southern Area. That's show how obsolete US & Taiwan Radar Technology compared to China
This is inconclusive, intelligence gathering does not have more actual combat experience to gain greater reasons.
They have the propaganda power. They can make any situation appear in their favour. Just like their genocidal wars were for freedom and democracy.
Calling me a pussy won't change the fact that you're literally using shit logic.
Have you ever fixed any machinery? Am not talking about building a computer but actual mechanical stuff. Never mind. That was a rhetorical question. I doubt you have anything worse than a paper cut.
www.navalnews.com
WOW, the Americans have been watching these intelligences you mentioned in the various exercises that the Chinese navy has conducted over the decades, and the Chinese intelligence ships have also watched them during the US exercises.Have you ever fixed any machinery? Am not talking about building a computer but actual mechanical stuff. Never mind. That was a rhetorical question. I doubt you have anything worse than a paper cut.
Anyway...
For any action, there is a reaction and that reaction is resistance. Take a nut and bolt, for example. Exposed to the elements, the nut will produce greater resistance to attempts to loosen it from the bolt. An experienced mechanic will know better than a novice on how to deal with such conditions. That is why you always have to pay more for experience of any kind, whether it is the plumber, the auto mechanic, a programmer, a soldier, or a pilot.
The corollary is that with combat experience, the US, particularly the Navy, will glean out details that casual and ignorant observers, like you guys here, will miss out. With combat experience, the USN will note the timing of ship movements, radio transmissions, radar emissions, or flights, and put them into a coherent picture. We will note how the PLAN respond to weather compare to ours. At sea, how to deal with sea states is critical.
Douglas sea scale - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
How does the PLAN deal with various sea states regarding ship movements? Do YOU know? Can you even guess how the USN can use this information in battle? For example...
PHIB SEABEE BATTLEBOOK
man.fas.org
In that source, each vessel have a 'Sea State' range. Do YOU know how PLAN destroyers and cruisers maneuvers in State 2 or 3?
US Navy Looks Again at VDS Options for New Frigate - Naval News
The U.S. Navy's Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) this week issued a Request for Information (RFI) for a Variable Depth Sonar (VDS) System for the future Constellation-class frigate.
4. Provide environmental operational capability documentation that includes the proven range of operational speed, ability to perform during ship maneuvering, and operational sea state based on the NATO Sea State Table.
Have YOU ever been on a boat going across a lake, not open sea, with 1-foot swell? If never, then what make you think you know better than experienced sailors on what they can observe of the PLAN ships around Taiwan? Am Air Force, not Navy, and already I can guess some.
So you guys can 'drill' and try to scare the Taiwanese all you want, for now. We will observe and take plenty of notes.
You can mock me all you want, but all it does is revealed your ignorance.
It's just a self-comforting statement, an ignorant statement. If observations of the exercise were so effective, any national team would park warships in port。You can mock me all you want, but all it does is revealed your ignorance.
Xi Jinping humiliated as Taiwan drill stunt backfires
TAIWAN drills have been central for propaganda purposes within China but might have led to leakage of information on how Beijing operates in battle mode,www.express.co.uk
“But I think there was another audience watching, spies because they can use satellites now to see fresh, pin-sharp images of how the People’s Liberation Army operates in battle mode.Now the longer they continue and the more ships and aircraft and anti-submarine operations they bring into play in this theatre, the more information the spies from Japan and America will be able to obtain, which I think they could use to work out how China might approach a potential invasion of Taiwan.”
You think am the only one ?
Then why does anyone do reconnaissance? After all, the targets are usually static, right? So, if according to your non-experience life, that observation of war games are useless, that mean just simple reconnaissance must be even more useless, right? I hope the PLA leadership is filled with people like you.
stupid idea. The observation of the exercise has been ongoing, and it has never been possible to make a huge discovery by observing the exercise a few more times. Otherwise, why have navies around the world been conducting exercises? American, Russian, Chinese intelligence ships never miss their opponent's drills? If the gains are so huge, why do these countries conduct exercises to provide adversary observation? A spy, a bribed general, such as a senior officer in electronic warfare equipment previously captured in Taiwan can provide much more critical information.
