S-2
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2007
- Messages
- 4,210
- Reaction score
- 0
"They're all very diff groups with varying objectives."
Don't openly display callous idiocy like this lest the images of SWAT correlated with Kabul stadium haunt your twisted narrative. They're all very much the same group of perverse and murderous souls. Your Omar kills afghans at a 2:1 pace compared to Americans and the rest of ISAF.
"And the TTP having been formed on the occasion of your drone attacks really don't help your warped-up thesis..."
How do you explain when Nek Mohammad was killed by eating a HELLFIRE missile? You do know, at least I hope, that his death preceded the formation of the TTP (Dec. 14, 2007) by almost exactly three and one-half years (June 18, 2004)?
So WHOSE thesis is really warped-up again?
It appears you've a skewed and inaccurate recollection of events that suits your rhetorical drool but has yet to approach factual reality. Both TTP's founder and our PREDATORS were doing their respective thingys long before the formation of TTP.
Catch a clue before inaccurately pontificating out of your fourth point of contact please. It makes meaningful discourse impossible otherwise.
Even the simplest child knows that the relationship of these men to the afghan taliban and even A.Q. is long and elaborate. In short, to avoid spending my valuable time on a vacant wastrel soul such as yourself, Baitullah's relationship with the afghan taliban reaches back literally to the taliban's formation in 1994 back in Oruzgan unless you'd care to dispute his many trips into Afghanistan to assist in the implementation of their uniquely taliban sharia.
Just imagine what a guy like you might learn if you spent less time trying to bullsh!t and a bit more actually reading? It truly boggles the mind...
...if you possessed one worth engaging.
"No one can enslave the Afghans. We never tried it nor have such aspirations."
Uh huh. Sure. These are your words-
"I might add that Pakistan cannot afford to allow Indian stooges to represent Afghanistan, even if Afghans decide to vote them in..."
Your intent is crystalline. Start tap-dancing, clown.
If afghans "decide", then who are the Pakistanis to "afford your fascinating aspirations"?
"...allowing all sorts of mischievous activities i.e. drugs, to criminals, terrorists etc. have a free rein across the border into Pak says so much about your hypocritical approach to this issue"
Would those be the same terrorists that have established their headquarters and more on Pakistani lands since November, 2001? Haqqani? Hekmatyar? Omar, Zawahiri, OBL?
I'd also bet you're one of those that like to brag how the taliban eradicated opium from Afghanistan too, eh? If so, I agree 100%. Sadly, accomplishing such in an eight month period in the spring of 2001 hardly accounted for the destructive impact it reaped upon all those farmers who'd the taliban had convinced were fine with that particular evil.
You do know that opium cultivation hit new world record levels in 1999-three years AFTER the taliban assumed control of Afghanistan, correct? How was it, then, that two more years passed and, voila!, gone. They played those farm families like yo-yos' to suit their temporal expediencies.
You are aware that the taliban make a pretty penny today from the same criminal activities, correct?
Your moral righteousness is built upon quicksand. Move fast or drown in it. You can guess my preference, hypocrite.
"I am a Westerner* so much to your dismay..."
Maybe. Living in the west doesn't necessarily qualify. Your heart's clearly in some cave with a pair of high-top sneakers and an AK.
"I guess you're left with no more ammo that now you're resorting to personal attacks.. cheers lad "
My guess is you're the lad here. It shows in your inability to meet dialogue with anything more than snide rhetoric to cover your prove lapses in factual accuracy.
You've spun a narrative that suits your end goals. Within those fortifications, you've shielded yourself from reality. The data is plain that most afghans have no use for the taliban and know there's nothing at the end of that regressive pseudo-utopian rainbow except subjugation. They've been there and done that to their eternal despair.
I've plenty of factual ammo awaiting those interested in true discourse. That no longer includes you.
I'm done with you. You're an arm-chair irhabist that has already wasted too much of my time. Thus, as Patriot has pointed out rather eloquently, you merit little further meaningful consideration. We've no common ground whatsoever so that means you'll be finding the "ignore" list of which I've found useful of late.
We're done here.
Now THAT gives me an ear-to-ear grin...
...laddie.
Thanks.
Don't openly display callous idiocy like this lest the images of SWAT correlated with Kabul stadium haunt your twisted narrative. They're all very much the same group of perverse and murderous souls. Your Omar kills afghans at a 2:1 pace compared to Americans and the rest of ISAF.
"And the TTP having been formed on the occasion of your drone attacks really don't help your warped-up thesis..."
How do you explain when Nek Mohammad was killed by eating a HELLFIRE missile? You do know, at least I hope, that his death preceded the formation of the TTP (Dec. 14, 2007) by almost exactly three and one-half years (June 18, 2004)?
So WHOSE thesis is really warped-up again?
It appears you've a skewed and inaccurate recollection of events that suits your rhetorical drool but has yet to approach factual reality. Both TTP's founder and our PREDATORS were doing their respective thingys long before the formation of TTP.
Catch a clue before inaccurately pontificating out of your fourth point of contact please. It makes meaningful discourse impossible otherwise.
Even the simplest child knows that the relationship of these men to the afghan taliban and even A.Q. is long and elaborate. In short, to avoid spending my valuable time on a vacant wastrel soul such as yourself, Baitullah's relationship with the afghan taliban reaches back literally to the taliban's formation in 1994 back in Oruzgan unless you'd care to dispute his many trips into Afghanistan to assist in the implementation of their uniquely taliban sharia.
Just imagine what a guy like you might learn if you spent less time trying to bullsh!t and a bit more actually reading? It truly boggles the mind...
...if you possessed one worth engaging.
"No one can enslave the Afghans. We never tried it nor have such aspirations."
Uh huh. Sure. These are your words-
"I might add that Pakistan cannot afford to allow Indian stooges to represent Afghanistan, even if Afghans decide to vote them in..."
Your intent is crystalline. Start tap-dancing, clown.
If afghans "decide", then who are the Pakistanis to "afford your fascinating aspirations"?
"...allowing all sorts of mischievous activities i.e. drugs, to criminals, terrorists etc. have a free rein across the border into Pak says so much about your hypocritical approach to this issue"
Would those be the same terrorists that have established their headquarters and more on Pakistani lands since November, 2001? Haqqani? Hekmatyar? Omar, Zawahiri, OBL?
I'd also bet you're one of those that like to brag how the taliban eradicated opium from Afghanistan too, eh? If so, I agree 100%. Sadly, accomplishing such in an eight month period in the spring of 2001 hardly accounted for the destructive impact it reaped upon all those farmers who'd the taliban had convinced were fine with that particular evil.
You do know that opium cultivation hit new world record levels in 1999-three years AFTER the taliban assumed control of Afghanistan, correct? How was it, then, that two more years passed and, voila!, gone. They played those farm families like yo-yos' to suit their temporal expediencies.
You are aware that the taliban make a pretty penny today from the same criminal activities, correct?
Your moral righteousness is built upon quicksand. Move fast or drown in it. You can guess my preference, hypocrite.
"I am a Westerner* so much to your dismay..."
Maybe. Living in the west doesn't necessarily qualify. Your heart's clearly in some cave with a pair of high-top sneakers and an AK.
"I guess you're left with no more ammo that now you're resorting to personal attacks.. cheers lad "
My guess is you're the lad here. It shows in your inability to meet dialogue with anything more than snide rhetoric to cover your prove lapses in factual accuracy.
You've spun a narrative that suits your end goals. Within those fortifications, you've shielded yourself from reality. The data is plain that most afghans have no use for the taliban and know there's nothing at the end of that regressive pseudo-utopian rainbow except subjugation. They've been there and done that to their eternal despair.
I've plenty of factual ammo awaiting those interested in true discourse. That no longer includes you.
I'm done with you. You're an arm-chair irhabist that has already wasted too much of my time. Thus, as Patriot has pointed out rather eloquently, you merit little further meaningful consideration. We've no common ground whatsoever so that means you'll be finding the "ignore" list of which I've found useful of late.
We're done here.
Now THAT gives me an ear-to-ear grin...
...laddie.
Thanks.