US B-52 bombers fly close to Guangdong coast

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Oh yeah? Well why don't they do it again since that time? No volunteers?

Since last encounter US stay far away from our border with their patrol, I think they got conditioned by our pilots so there is no point to do it again.

 

[Oldman1]

Probably now China may not need to ramp fighter anymore.

In recent years, USA combat platform from warship to aircraft, or even personnels have filed complains that they are under attacked by EW or high energy weapons.

Nothing new there. Russians got style.

Since last encounter US stay far away from our border with their patrol, I think they got conditioned by our pilots so there is no point to do it again.

Since that last encounter? There have been no change. You just saw your own Chinese flanker flying next to the U.S. plane. Unless that flanker went near the U.S. border. That be impressive for such a long range plane.

 

[Yingluck]

Nothing new there. Russians got style.

This is old way and increasing people is using high energy weapons, and EW.

 

[Oldman1]

This is old way and increasing people is using high energy weapons, and EW.

Well keep doing it then.

This is old way and increasing people is using high energy weapons, and EW.

Just recently the Russians were able to shut down the U.S. destroyer and its couldn't move and forced the sailors to quit because they couldn't handle it. Impressive eh?

This is old way and increasing people is using high energy weapons, and EW.

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/13/aegis-fail-in-black-sea-ruskies-burn-down-uss-donald-duck/

AEGIS Fail in Black SEA, Ruskies Burn Down USS Donald “Duck”

Russian Sukhoi Su -24 with the newest jamming complex paralyzed in the Black Sea the most modern American combat management system “Aegis” installed on the destroyer “USS Donald Cook”. Pavel Zolotarev, Deputy Director, Institute of USA and Canada, shares details about this version which is being actively discussed in the Russian media and by bloggers.

US destroyer “Donald Cook” with cruise missiles “Tomahawk” entered the neutral waters of the Black Sea on April 10. The purpose was a demonstration of force and intimidation in connection with the position of Russia in Ukraine and Crimea. The appearance of American warships in these waters is in contradiction of the Montreux Convention about the nature and duration of stay in the Black Sea by the military ships of countries not washed by this sea.

In response, Russia sent an unarmed bomber Su- 24 to fly around the U.S. destroyer. However, experts say that this plane was equipped with the latest Russian electronic warfare complex. According to this version, “Aegis” spotted from afar the approaching aircraft, and sounded alarm. Everything went normally, American radars calculated the speed of the approaching target. And suddenly all the screens went blank. “Aegis” was not working any more, and the rockets could not get target information. Meanwhile, Su-24 flew over the deck of the destroyer, did battle turn and simulated missile attack on the target. Then it turned and repeated the maneuver. And did so 12 times.

Apparently, all efforts to revive the “Aegis” and provide target information for the defence failed. Russia’s reaction to military pressure from the United States was profoundly calm, feels the Russian political scientist Pavel Zolotarev:

The demonstration was original enough. A bomber without any weapons, but having onboard equipment for jamming enemy radar, worked against a destroyer equipped with “Aegis”, the most modern system of air and missile defence. But this system of mobile location, in this case the ship, has a significant drawback. That is, the target tracking capabilities.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

[QUOTE="Oldman1, post: 10469293, member: 39728"

Since that last encounter? There have been no change. You just saw your own Chinese flanker flying next to the U.S. plane. Unless that flanker went near the U.S. border. That be impressive for such a long range plane.

You should go ask Pentagon if there is any change since last encounter, as for our flanker the flight was spectacular, I bet American pilot will be chicken out if their encounter our patrol plane

 

[淼淼De微笑]

2 bombers is just training. Not a full scale assault and not at war. That I guarantee. 2 bombers, 20 missiles. Sure thats nothing. 50 bombers, 1,000 missiles, well then you got something to worry about.

Yep i m so worried ,Please feel free to send moe bombers not only talk.We also get some missiles ready for you guys.

You should know just one thing,China is not Syria,Iraq,Afghan etc

 

[Oldman1]

You should go ask Pentagon if there is any change since last encounter, as for our flanker the flight was spectacular, I bet American pilot will be chicken out if their encounter our patrol plane

Your pilot chickened out. Refused to ram into the plane when China wanted the P-8 and ordered that he ram into. Why should the pilots of the P-8 be impressed?

Don't ignore that the U.S. still patrols. So your pilots actions didn't deter any more patrols.

Yep i m so worried ,Please feel free to send moe bombers not only talk.We also get some missiles ready for you guys.

You should know just one thing,China is not Syria,Iraq,Afghan etc

And U.S. is not Vietnam, Tibet or the Philippines.

You should go ask Pentagon if there is any change since last encounter, as for our flanker the flight was spectacular, I bet American pilot will be chicken out if their encounter our patrol plane

YOU GO NOW!!

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Your pilot chickened out. Refused to ram into the plane when China wanted the P-8 and ordered that he ram into. Why should the pilots of the P-8 be impressed?

Don't ignore that the U.S. still patrols. So your pilots actions didn't deter any more patrols.

Our pilot was chickened out? tell us who was the one complaining that plane got buzzed?

 

[terranMarine]

By 2049 China most likely have 10 or 11 AC carriers at our disposal, huge number of modern subs and destroyers in service. Our islands in SCS fully armed with anti ship and ground to air missiles, US Navy will suffer a huge amount of losses fighting in the 2nd island chain. By the time reaching the first island chain (if that's gonna even happen by that time), China's "unlimited" land based systems are gonna smack the US Navy and Airforce down. And should GI JOE ever setting foot on China, they shall be banged to the ground by the world's biggest army. If you think the Yankees were scared in the Korean War when they retreated back to the South, wait till they face the total ground troops of the PLA. We are gonna rape those motha fucka

 

[Jlaw]

By 2049 China most likely have 10 or 11 AC carriers at our disposal, huge number of modern subs and destroyers in service. Our islands in SCS fully armed with anti ship and ground to air missiles, US Navy will suffer a huge amount of losses fighting in the 2nd island chain. By the time reaching the first island chain (if that's gonna even happen by that time), China's "unlimited" land based systems are gonna smack the US Navy and Airforce down. And should GI JOE ever setting foot on China, they shall be banged to the ground by the world's biggest army. If you think the Yankees were scared in the Korean War when they retreated back to the South, wait till they face the total ground troops of the PLA. We are gonna rape those motha fucka

By 2049, oldman and Gambit will long be dead

 

[淼淼De微笑]

And U.S. is not Vietnam, Tibet or the Philippines.

!!

Stop talking bullsh!t,China didn't send bombers to threaten US, It is US threatening & invading the world all the time.

 

[Akasa]

还要狡辩？真不要脸。I even attached the picture and gave you the page number.

There is a line between entertaining stupidity and annoying stupidity, and you have crossed it. You were provided with sources that clearly stated the range of the skywave radar, which you were provided with the keywords and page number backing my claim. Despite all of that, you're still here trying to muddy the water with your non-sense. I'm going to leave the source here below. Come back in a few years when you learned to read. Maybe you'd be mildly entertaining rather than an annoyance.

对牛弹琴，中文什么意思懂不？算了，就当我免费给你这傻子上节课，教你怎么做人。


http://wap.eastday.com/node2/node3/n403/u1ai589092_t72.html

https://books.google.ca/books?id=Zu31BwAAQBAJ&pg=PT29&dq=天波雷达+飞机&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjjlrnp-uzaAhXmqVQKHSa7BzUQ6AEIJzAA#v=onepage&q=天波雷达 飞机&f=false

Your own source, which you purported to be evidence that China has these systems installed, failed to mention any Chinese skywave radars capable of tracking aircraft at 1000+ km ranges. Of the radars that could track aircraft, the PDF only listed those able to do so at 300-400 km ranges. You've been asked to find a radar system in that PDF that is both capable of tracking bomber formations and executing such tasks at beyond the range of a typical LACM, and you consistently were unable to do so.

Ironically, the same PDF did mention a system that can undertake what I've listed above. Unfortunately for your argument, that radar system happens to be American.

P.S. your Chinese source is no different from the link you posted earlier, except this time it had the convenience of quoting the all-credible, supremely-authoritative Kanwa Defense. </sarcasm>

Our pilot was chickened out? tell us who was the one complaining that plane got buzzed?

The fact that the United States continued to perform these flights, even after multiple interceptions, is a telltale sign of Beijing's inability to ward these patrols off without getting into something China cannot finish. So are the FONOP cruises American destroyers frequently take in the SCS.

 

[rott]

By 2049, oldman and Gambit will long be dead

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

The fact that the United States continued to perform these flights, even after multiple interceptions, is a telltale sign of Beijing's inability to ward these patrols off without getting into something China cannot finish. So are the FONOP cruises American destroyers frequently take in the SCS.

US continue to perform these flights not because China's inability to ward these patrols off but because some submissive neighbors surrendered their sovereignty to US and allow US to patrols at China coastal, the only way to deter US patrol on our border is to have base in South America nations or to deter these nations to allow US base at our vincinity.

 

[S10]

Your own source, which you purported to be evidence that China has these systems installed, failed to mention any Chinese skywave radars capable of tracking aircraft at 1000+ km ranges. Of the radars that could track aircraft, the PDF only listed those able to do so at 300-400 km ranges. You've been asked to find a radar system in that PDF that is both capable of tracking bomber formations and executing such tasks at beyond the range of a typical LACM, and you consistently were unable to do so.

Ironically, the same PDF did mention a system that can undertake what I've listed above. Unfortunately for your argument, that radar system happens to be American.

P.S. your Chinese source is no different from the link you posted earlier, except this time it had the convenience of quoting the all-credible, supremely-authoritative Kanwa Defense. </sarcasm>

If you're going to lie, pick a site where members could not read Chinese. What does this mean?

1982年包养浩、焦培南主持研制成功我国第一部“脉冲体制天波超视距试验雷达”（112-1雷达），成功地在强杂波中检测到900~1500km飞机目标，是我国成为独立地掌握这项技术的第三个国家。该雷达获1985年国家科技进步二等奖。1998年研制成功的我国第一部“调频连续波体制天波超视距试验雷达系统”，成功检测到近2000km的飞机目标并独立形成多批目标航迹。该雷达的关键技术已达到当今国际同类雷达系统的先进技术水平。1999年1月试验雷达系统通过国家鉴定。

http://wap.eastday.com/node2/node3/n403/u1ai589092_t72.html

1982年我国完成试验性天波超视距雷达，其在实验中成功探测到1200公里外的民航飞机，经过不断完善发展，目前天波超视距雷达已定型装备我军战略预警部队。
https://books.google.ca/books?id=Zu31BwAAQBAJ&pg=PT29&dq=天波雷达+飞机&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjjlrnp-uzaAhXmqVQKHSa7BzUQ6AEIJzAA#v=onepage&q=天波雷达 飞机&f=false

China has installed powerful radars with a detection range of 3,000 km so they can spy on South Korean and Japanese military maneuvers, Chinese media reported Monday.

The new Chinese radar points at Japan, making it capable of surveying the entire island nation and the Korean Peninsula, the reports said.

OTH radars are also effective in spotting stealth aircraft, and the U.S. Marine Corps' F-35B stealth fighters are based in Japan's Iwakuni. This is China's second OTH radar. The first was set up in the Hubei-Henan-Anhui triangle.

The two OTH radars enable China to monitor the entire western Pacific if used along with its spy satellites, the press reports said.

http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2017/03/14/2017031401319.html

Don't tell me you can't find the word aircraft in there. I highlighted it for you just so you can't lie further. I've been throwing sources in your face left, right and centre. Your pathetic rebuttal is that you can't find the world aircraft?

你人品跟你知识一样渣。

The fact that the United States continued to perform these flights, even after multiple interceptions, is a telltale sign of Beijing's inability to ward these patrols off without getting into something China cannot finish. So are the FONOP cruises American destroyers frequently take in the SCS.

The fact that China continues to reinforce and construct installations on islands in South China sea is a telltale sign of Washington's inability to do anything about China's assertion of sovereignty.

See how that logic works both ways little liar?