US B-52 bombers fly close to Guangdong coast

[ZeEa5KPul]

By 2049, oldman and Gambit will long be dead

What a tragedy that is. I want them to live to see their country's total and abject humiliation.

 

[rott]

What a tragedy that is. I want them to live to see their country's total and abject humiliation.

Lol, you're so wicked.

 

[The Accountant]

The US would be able to target facilities deep within Chinese territory using a combination of stealthy JASSM, AGM-86C/D, or Tomahawks. People seem to forget that the B-52 is capable of launching these weapons at standoff ranges, and that any Chinese air defense systems on the mainland would be quickly and efficiently eliminated in the opening stages of a conflict.

And this proves you are nothing but a fan boy ... How you propsed that few aircraft carriersbof us can attack such a huge defence force of China ... You are forgetting even a weak defence is strong at its mainland ...

 

[terranMarine]

What a tragedy that is. I want them to live to see their country's total and abject humiliation.

There's still hope, Gambit is somewhere in his mid 50s or almost 60. I think he could still be living the next 30 years and witness how China's military muscle multiplying in front of his teary eyes

 

[gambit]

The life of individual is nothing, merely expendable foot soldiers serving the ends of their nation.

But not YOUR life, right? This comment is typical of the coward. Brave with others' lives, but never his own.

Since last encounter US stay far away from our border with their patrol, I think they got conditioned by our pilots so there is no point to do it again.

I will admit...We are afraid of unprofessional and ill disciplined pilots. With such stupid flying, our lives are more valuable. Nevertheless, we will find alternative routes. We ALWAYS do.

US continue to perform these flights not because China's inability to ward these patrols off but because some submissive neighbors surrendered their sovereignty to US and allow US to patrols at China coastal, the only way to deter US patrol on our border is to have base in South America nations or to deter these nations to allow US base at our vincinity.

Wrong. We continues these flights PRECISELY because of China's inability to ward US off.

For starter, the flights are in international airspace. You have no legal rights to dictate where we fly.

Second, if you lay aside the legalities of these flights and attack US. Literally shoot at US. That will be end of your pathetic air fArce. There will be so many of US off China's coast that it will be your pilots who will be intimidated.

Oh yeah? Well why don't they do it again since that time? No volunteers?

They asked for Mr. Yingluck. The Chinese government contacted him personally but he chickenshit out. He is one of those typical keyboard warriors who are brave with others' lives. Never his own.

You seem to live in a fantasy world where advanced sensors and network centric warfare is only available to US, while all others are stuck in 1960's.

Never said so. That is your perception and shortsightedness that we would believe so.

The reality is that we -- not China -- made functional and successful the concepts of integrated sensors and networked data sharing between platforms. We know that once we proved it in battle, others will follows. We continues to improve what we achieved while you and others have to make do with trying it out the first time. You are far behind US, buddy.

You claim a background of military service (if true, they take all kinds eh?),...

You can make the same claim. Try it and see how quickly you get busted as a fraud.

...and yet you seem to be a relic of an era that have long past. You even managed to get the part about PLA commercial interest wrong, as officers in the PLA had been banned from involvement in such activities for two whole decades. Entire generation of NCOs and officers have been born and raised since them. Either Jim Mattis is wrong, or you're off your meds again.

Now is it YOU who is living in a bubble. But that is understandable and excusable. You never served, so you really have no idea of what you are trying defend. You never served, so you do not know the structures, the institutions, the official and unofficial ways of doing things, the backdoors, the relationships, and many more.

There will always be corruption and assorted criminality. But corruption from the bottom up is easily contained. A soldier stealing one rifle or even a case of rifles is not the same as creating relationships that allows transfer of billions anytime anywhere. Buying and selling ranks allows the creation of a NETWORK of similarly minded officers at all levels to facilitate each other's corruption. That can only happens from the top down and is the worst kind.

You can get rid of some people, but the network is built and the people inside the network, they are not stupid. Each of them is aware of the potential that one day, they will be targeted. That is a risk they are willing to take as the wealth they can and have accumulated is too much to ignore. They have taken steps to protect the network that they built and risked careers and lives to maintain. Xi is also not stupid. He came from that world. He knows how difficult it is to damage, let alone destroy it. The few examples he made? He knows that is not enough. But he has to at least try.

Your PLA is now riddled with incompetent officers at ALL levels.

You seem to have trouble understanding that long range OTH are meant for early warning and work as part of the IADS. It does not need to provide targeting solution, but rather warn of the presence of hostile targets in coordination with other assets. And yes, OTHR is capable of tracking of aircrafts, especially one as large as B-52.

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a474069.pdf

Perhaps it is time for you to do a little reading instead.

Here is the Canadian experience with OTH systems...

http://cradpdf.drdc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc81/p527279.pdf

Plenty of issues, problems, flaws, and weaknesses. You are behind the reading curve, buddy.

 

[j20blackdragon]

 

[j20blackdragon]

China Teases Its H-20 Stealth Bomber and Trolls Northrop Grumman At The Same Time

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...-and-trolls-northrop-grumman-at-the-same-time

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Wrong. We continues these flights PRECISELY because of China's inability to ward US off.

For starter, the flights are in international airspace. You have no legal rights to dictate where we fly.

Second, if you lay aside the legalities of these flights and attack US. Literally shoot at US. That will be end of your pathetic air fArce. There will be so many of US off China's coast that it will be your pilots who will be intimidated.
.

I know you viet like to fantasize how China US shoot each other, that was so predictable for people like you that lack of strategic mind, we Chinese are aiming to eventually replace US and we need to be cautious and make meticulous calculation on how to deal with US. it's been over 40 years, US was trying to provoke China and find excuse for a fight, but we Chinese had the wisdom of Han's emperor Liu Pan 刘邦 who was not interested in suicidal brutal fight when he was not ready against Xiang Yu the conqueror which had the far superior army but instead Liu Pan gradually waned Xiang Yu's force. Same go with US, we will keep maintain a strong army while let US got bleeding elsewhere such as Middle east.

You can keep begging us pathetically to shoot US plane which will never happen beside on your dream, we have bigger plan for US.

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

I know you viet like to fantasize how China US shoot each other, that was so predictable for people like you that lack of strategic mind, we Chinese are aiming to eventually replace US and we need to be cautious and make meticulous calculation on how to deal with US. it's been over 40 years, US was trying to provoke China and find excuse for a fight, but we Chinese had the wisdom of Han's emperor Liu Pan 刘邦 who was not interested to fight in suicidal brutal fight when he was not ready against Xiang Yu the conqueror which had the far superior army but instead Liu Pan gradually waned Xiang Yu's force. Same go with US, we will keep maintain a strong army while let US got bleeding elsewhere such as Middle east.

You can keep begging us pathetically to shoot US plane which will never happen beside on your dream, we have bigger plan for US.

I wonder, when @gambit sits on his haunches and begs his white masters to attack China, do they just kick him or do they sometimes give him a bone and pat him on the head?

 

[Oldman1]

Our pilot was chickened out? tell us who was the one complaining that plane got buzzed?

China is complaining about U.S. planes flying over their so called territories.

Stop talking bullsh!t,China didn't send bombers to threaten US, It is US threatening & invading the world all the time.

You send bombers towards Japan. You can't send bombers to U.S. because you don't have that capability. So far you send warships near Hawaii and Alaska. Don't talk BS when you are doing that.

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

You can't send bombers to U.S. because you don't have that capability.

Soon...

 

[Oldman1]

Soon...

You talking about the U.S. bomber?

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

You talking about the U.S. bomber?

Look closely, that isn't the US bomber.

 

[Oldman1]

Look closely, that isn't the US bomber.

You sure?

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

You sure?

Quite. Scroll up to post 81 and you'll see what I mean.