"When i talk about talking to them i propose this as a viable, logical strategy. I am saying this that eventually this will make things better as it did for us in Swat..."
Great. Do so on your own lands...yet again. The evidence is in on these fcuks and I'm ASTOUNDED by your contention. I'm equally ASTOUNDED by your complete lack of understanding about the taliban's view of such.
Don't you READ? Omar has made clear his complete willingness to "
talk" after ISAF has departed. Not before. Given his personal legacy and abhorrance of any democratic process, you can be assured that there'll be very little talking and one damnably large civil war...again.
Stunning what you'll foist on the afghans but not accept for your own sisters and mothers. For shame given all you've seen. Seriously.
"...i guess all are welcome to form their opinion..."
Mine is formed about the taliban, A.Q., Hekmatyar, Haqqani, Maulvi Nazir, and Hafez Gul Bahadur. You seem to need further lessons of pain administered like that young lady we all saw last spring in SWAT.
Thanks but, no thanks.
Hope you read those polls and reconsider your thoughts in light of that data. Hope you provide better if in disagreement. Other than that, I'm sorry if your feelings are hurt that Afghans aren't overwhelmed with Pakistan's role in all of this but you may require some reassessment of your role vis-a-vis your neighbors.
Thanks.
S-2,
Twice you have debunked my talks proposal as an uneducated or ignorant comment.
You need to read the entirety of this proposal and at least try to understand why i feel it is important...
There is a certain key item i actually wanted you to comment upon...
It is the fact that this is even suggested by Karzai and was one of his key agenda items as part of his presidential campaign... here is a link and it is not that old...
Hamid Karzai reaches out to 'Taliban brothers' in Afghanistan - Telegraph
Instead you are trying take me apart and implicate me as someone who is willfully neglecting the facts and deliberately accepting for Afghans a fate which i would not accept for my own people...clearly not my intention and certainly not something i would ever want...
Once again i am posting what i wrote and what needs to be read in full and not in parts...
When i talk about talking to them i propose this as a viable, logical strategy. I am saying this that eventually this will make things better as it did for us in Swat...if they are willing to listen then it is good...if not then that is even better for those who dislike them because it will take away their local support...if however the experts think that they do not have local support...then that explains why aversion to such an approach...
...
Still i fail to understand why the mention of dialogue or mention of Omar by Karzai as if inviting them to resolve a family dispute?
If they are so much loathed and hated and perceived as absolute devils...then why is this even being mentioned by those across the border...those victims who supposedly hate Pakistan for imposing Taliban on them...
My suggestion is not acceptance of Taliban rule but trying to establish what terms they are willing to offer for peace...the more unilateral their terms, the lesser support they shall be able to rally.
Moreover, if there are key people in Afghan government who feel that they need to talk to Taliban then i do not understand why this cannot be compared to Swat scenario and be explored...
Now if they accept a reasonable proposal for peace then it shall auger well for the common man to have stability.
However if on the other hand as per your perception it turns out that they 100% reject all offers of peace and talks (regardless of the terms)...then it seems that it shall only rob them further of any support that they enjoy currently, except for perhaps a very few hardcore members of Taliban...
Either way i do not see why talking to them translates to accepting their views and imposing them on the Afghans...
I knew from day one what the TTP would do in Swat, when many people were positive about the peace deal...i could gauge that TTP will never abide by it because they cannot survive the peace...however many disagreed with me and eventually whatever happened...most of us are now in the same boat because we have solid evidence that TTP could not digest peace, there is a huge change in public perception that TTP needed to be dealt with a stick and not olive branch...
Now the point about Omar not talking is something that is not holding Karzai back in calling Taliban to talk, clearly there is something to be gained by all of this otherwise why say it despite the snubs by Taliban leadership?
Explain to me why Karzai proposes talks then if you feel that i am totally and utterly devoid of logic in seeing something to be gained by constantly proposing talks.
If Taliban do not show any inclination to talk despite these offers, then eventually they shall be completely isolated...otherwise they shall be no more in the same boat as Al Qaeda...which was the primary antagonist to begin with.
I do not foist on the Afghans anything that i do not accept for my own sisters and mothers, do not draw such conclusions.
Their ignorant interpretation of Islam was perhaps the biggest thing i hated when all else about them was perceived as passable in their initial days.
Taliban are not ideologically in any way my ideals nor will they ever be.
However strategically treating them all like Al Qaeda is a big mistake since their ambitions were very different, local versus global.
The fact that before US offensive the grand jirga was able to persuade Omar to try Osama for his alleged crimes in Afghanistan proves that at least not all were blindly supportive of Osama...