What's new

US: Africa can buy Russian grain but could face consequences if they trade in U.S.-sanctioned commodities such as Russian oil

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China

US: Africa can buy Russian grain but could face consequences if they trade in U.S.-sanctioned commodities such as Russian oil​

The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations says African nations are free to buy grain from Russia but could face consequences if they trade in U.S.-sanctioned commodities such as Russian oil.

By Associated Press
Aug. 4, 2022, at 4:13 p.m.

90

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield speaks to the media at the residence of the U.S. Ambassador to Uganda, in the capital Kampala, Uganda Thursday, Aug. 4, 2022. . (AP Photo/Hajarah Nalwadda) THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

By RODNEY MUHUMUZA, Associated Press

KAMPALA, Uganda (AP) — African nations are free to buy grain from Russia but could face consequences if they trade in U.S.-sanctioned commodities such as Russian oil, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations said Thursday.

“Countries can buy Russian agricultural products, including fertilizer and wheat,” Linda Thomas-Greenfield said. But she added that “if a country decides to engage with Russia, where there are sanctions, then they are breaking those sanctions.”

“We caution countries not to break those sanctions because then ... they stand the chance of having actions taken against them,” she said.

Thomas-Greenfield spoke in the Ugandan capital, Kampala, after a meeting with President Yoweri Museveni, a U.S. ally who has not criticized Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and has expressed sympathy with Moscow.

Uganda is the U.S. official's first stop on an African tour that will include visits to Ghana and Cape Verde. Her trip comes a week after the Africa visit of Sergey Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, who dismissed charges that his country's invasion of Ukraine is solely responsible for a dangerous food crisis in countries ranging from Somalia to South Sudan.

Lavrov blamed food shortages in the market on “the absolutely inadequate reaction of the West, which announced sanctions” following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Ukraine and Russia are key global suppliers of wheat, barley, corn and sunflower oil, with fighting in the Black Sea region, known as t he “breadbasket of the world,” pushing up food prices,
threatening political stability in developing nations and leading countries to ban some food exports.

Many African countries — including some with areas that are on the threshold of famine — depend heavily on grain imports from Russia and Ukraine.

Thomas-Greenfield insisted that sanctions imposed by Washington are not to blame for rising food prices in Africa and elsewhere.

She said the U.S. seeks to strengthen existing partnerships in African countries such as Uganda and spoke of Museveni, an authoritarian who has held power for 36 years, as a regional leader with whom the U.S. has “mutual interests.”

Uganda is one of 25 African nations that abstained or didn’t vote in the U.N. General Assembly resolution condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine earlier this year. Many countries on the continent of 1.3 billion people have long-standing ties with Moscow, dating back to the Cold War when the Soviet Union supported their anti-colonial struggles.

Museveni said during Lavrov's visit that Russia has been a friend to the East African country for more than 100 years, suggesting he felt under pressure to support the U.S. position on the war in Ukraine.

 
Today Ukraine grain goes to Ireland and UK.

Will it end in Africa? Why those useless intermediaries?
 
The fact that Africa is still relying on Russian/Ukranian grain despite the Nile and Niger deltas (one of the most fertile, naturally irrigated lands on the planet) being located in Africa, is a scathing indictment on their failure to invest in food security. I'm sick of hearing people bitch about problems that would have been solved decades ago with proper leadership and investment.
 
The fact that Africa is still relying on Russian/Ukranian grain despite the Nile and Niger deltas (one of the most fertile, naturally irrigated lands on the planet) being located in Africa, is a scathing indictment on their failure to invest in food security. I'm sick of hearing people bitch about problems that would have been solved decades ago with proper leadership and investment.

A lot of those countries have their infrastructure set up only to export cash crops/minerals away from the country because of colonialism, so they have big issues with self suffiency as their economies prior to independence were based on importing necesseties and exporting value goods.

Then theres the fact that after independence European nations continued to interfere in domestic policies for their own favour, so anybody remotely competent looking to move away from the import model was forcibly removed and replaced by someone far less capable and more manipulated. These same European countries also made debt and colonial taxes a condition of independence so for most of their post-colonial history they were paying back Europe for "infrastructure projects" and other things despite having virtually no budget.

Then theres places like DR Congo which allegedly has a trillion dollars worth of natural resources but was run as the personal property of King Leopold of Belgium and who killed up to 10 million people.

Its easy to say they should have solved these issues decades ago, but it would be like saying a homeless man with no legs and suffering from gangrene should have worked hard to buy a house.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom