What's new

US-Afghanistan supply lines remain open after Pakistan funding cut, Mattis says

It's getting clear they lost it all they trying to hold the ground. Loosing 48% ur Territory is big question on over all US capabilities and will to fight.
Afghan wars are.not 2 weeks wars like iraq , u capture baghdad , mosal
Then peoples start accepting thier fate slowly , I can bet still there are parts of afghanistan where peoples still think that mullha omar is still alive & rocking ?lol
Which means , they will take any intruders to.hill tops where there will be no gps signals , then they will hunt them ,.one by one !
That kind of war , is so self defeating for any just arrived soilder in.afghanistan !
 
.
Mattis said he had “no indication” from the Pakistani government that the U.S. decision would impact the ground lines of communication, or GLOCs, that supply convoys use to deliver food and equipment to U.S. bases in Afghanistan. The U.S. has alternative routes to supply its forces, including flying supplies in, but that is much more expensive.
https://www.defensenews.com/flashpo...-decision-will-impact-afghanistan-operations/

Looks like Mattis the mad dog trying to relate supply route cut to so called "aid" cut because that would look like Pakistan wanting US "aid". Despite US spin, fact of the matter is, Pakistan position and reactions are based on overall US strategy against Pakistan.

Perhaps, NOT Pakistani official BUT truck driver give US defense secretary Mattis a call that his supply can no longer pass through. Make sure Pakistani FO give truck drive the phone number of Mattis.
 
Last edited:
.
If they have an alternative route then let them use that! That is what mattis says in the article. Musharraf needs to be shot for allowing this supply free of cost and the successors.


Musharraf has to be given a gold medal !
to bring USA to its own bear trap !
He brought them here , fooled them , & put them in afghanistans never ending war , which brought us a leverege against them , its up to our traitor govts how to use them or not ,infact he put most of the money which he got fooling americans , into our banks ,wht these traitors done , selling OBL & putting money into there own banks ?
 
.
Musharraf has to be given to bring USA to its own bear trap !
He brought them here , fooled them , & put them in afghanistans never ending war , which brought us a leverege against them , its up to our traitor govts how to use them or not ,infact he put most of the money which he got fooling americans , into our banks ,wht these traitors done , selling OBL & putting money into there own banks ?
there is NO proof OBL was in there! it was OBL who apparently wanted them to be in afghanistan like the soviets. apparently.
 
.
The U.S. decision to cut up to $2 billion in military assistance to Pakistan is not expected to affect the supply lines the U.S. relies upon for its Afghanistan operations, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said Friday.

The State Department announced the cuts Thursday in order to pressure the Pakistani government to “take decisive action” against extremist groups that operate from Pakistan, including the Haqqani Network and the Taliban.

The announcement followed President Donald Trump accusing Pakistan of “lies and deceit” in his first Tweet of the new year. “They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan, with little help. No more!” Trump tweeted Jan. 1.

On Friday, Pakistan defended its record against fighting extremism and left open the possibility that the U.S. decision to cut aid could indeed impact U.S. operations there.

“We are engaged with the U.S. administration on the issue of security cooperation and await further details,” Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Impact of [the] U.S. decision on pursuit of common objectives is also likely to emerge more clearly in due course of time.”

On Friday, a Trump administration official outlined the total cuts. The $2 billion includes about $1 billion in planned military assistance, including the $255 million in foreign military financing that was already on hold, and $900 million in Coalition Support Funds that would reimburse Pakistan for counterterrorism operations.

In an off-camera briefing with reporters on Friday, Mattis took a more conciliatory approach. He acknowledged Pakistan’s anti-terrorism efforts and emphasized that aid would be restored if the U.S. sees evidence of renewed effort by Pakistan.

“I think many of you are aware that Pakistan has lost more troops, total, than all the NATO coalition combined,” in the counterterrorism fight inside Pakistan, Mattis said.

“As you saw in the statement, there were very specific words that said we’re still working with Pakistan, and we would restore the aid if we see decisive movements against the terrorists who are as much of a threat against Pakistan as they are against us,” Mattis said, referring to the State Departments official announcement on the aid cuts Thursday.

Mattis said he had “no indication” from the Pakistani government that the U.S. decision would impact the ground lines of communication, or GLOCs, that supply convoys use to deliver food and equipment to U.S. bases in Afghanistan. The U.S. has alternative routes to supply its forces, including flying supplies in, but that is much more expensive.

Trump had been hinting at cutting off additional aid to Pakistan since he announced his South Asia Strategy last year. The South Asia strategy took a regional approach, including engagement with India and Pakistan, to trying to end the now 17-year war in Afghanistan.

“We have been paying Pakistan billions and billions of dollars at the same time they are housing the very terrorists that we are fighting. But that will have to change, and that will change immediately,” Trump said in a speech in Virginia in August, when he outlined the new strategy.

Mattis said that Thursday’s announcement was in line with the strategy, and would be accompanied by continued engagement with Pakistan.

“Everything we are doing is integrated into the strategy,” Mattis said. “Obviously we’ll continue talking with one another.”

https://www.defensenews.com/flashpo...-decision-will-impact-afghanistan-operations/
Who says we always keep our promises especially when allies act like enemies.

Keep your supplies in Afghanistan at least for months....harsh winter is coming....
 
Last edited:
.
there is NO proof OBL was in there! it was OBL who apparently wanted them to be in afghanistan like the soviets. apparently.
Wow so , that means , its OBL who gave pakistani support to bring heavy weapons to afghanistan ?
Its a complex game , frist time when pakistan was called by BUSH , are you with us or against us , that time yes we didnt had any clue , but then we took OUT , old plans of late ISI genral abdur rehmans desks ,
which brought us the knowledge that OBL was & still is a CIA stooge ?
Then that was the time , we planned this war of terror on the master of terror?
Why OBL been spotted in abotabad?
How he came there ?
Musharaf aressted him , on.his return from afghanistsn but never met him directly , he was kept under unseen barriers, & then all of his debriefings showen to BUSH & then CIA chiefs , which resulted in huge favours for pakistan cause then , it was in.musharafs hand to bring OBL live to the world & let it known , how this whole game was been played , but then what will have happened ?
CIA would have denied, it facing humiliation , but what we would have gotten ?
Just public good will gestures ?
Or they would have brought plan B , ISIS?
We chose right , path we got many of the techs , from usa ,which we wouldnt be expecting , which made us finish our higher end projects like JFthunder and others & cleaned our debts , brought money into our banks , making investments im.telecommunications , banking sectors , bringing enormous jobs ?
That what was inportant to us at that time , musharaf left pakistan , with our state bank having tons of reserves , where it went , oh in.dubai real states frist zardari then noora league taking all ????
 
. .
Who says we always keep our promises especially when allies act like enemies.

Keep your supplies in Afghanistan at least for months....harsh winter in coming....
They are creating preasure on themselves bringing the lever , to pakistan , whenever it wants it will cut them the supplies , all is left on.americans gussing when , it a dam preasure ! Lol
 
. .
This route should be closed immediately.
Need to wait untill they really needed it , let freedom fighters in.afghanistan plan a good cordinated final run , then cut them out ?lolzz
Bringing CNN live , captured american rambos dancing in.womens cloths in.afghanistan , imagine what impact that will create on tax payers ????lolzx
 
.
.
It is an epic tragedy. We are our own worst enemy.
If you listen there failed prapoganda then , you will think anti pakistan against our estsblishment ?
Thats all they want , if musharaf was so bowed down to them , then why they got rid of him ?
Oh cause he made bush & his CIA chief acting like bunnys ?
Then they came after getting rid of him ,
Accusing him of double games ?????lolzz
While installing croupt traitors as our democratic leaders ?..
Look what they have done ????from panama to dubai real states ?
Why mushrafs name never came in those crouption scandles ?????
 
.
If you listen there failed prapoganda then , you will think anti pakistan against our estsblishment ?
Thats all they want , if musharaf was so bowed down to them , then why they got rid of him ?
Oh cause he made bush & his CIA chief acting like bunnys ?
Then they came after getting rid of him ,
Accusing him of double games ?????lolzz
While installing croupt traitors as our democratic leaders ?..
Look what they have done ????from panama to dubai real states ?
Why mushrafs name never came in those crouption scandles ?????

Pakistan should tax every container destined for Afghanistan. It is a tragedy this doesn't happen.

We don't want the US to cut aid, but cannot even demand reimbursement for using our roads and infrastructure? That is insane and something is seriously wrong here.
 
.
Pakistan should tax every container destined for Afghanistan. It is a tragedy this doesn't happen.

We don't want the US to cut aid, but cannot even demand reimbursement for using roads and infrastructure? That is insane.
Bro be , a bit humble let us play innocent part frist , let them go down , then bring super india to afghanistan to rescure dancing ramboss , then we will make tht a reason.
We will.play by the book because that will.bring us more then that little shyt ?lolzz
 
.
Bro be , a bit humble let us play innocent part frist , let them go down , then bring super india to afghanistan to rescure dancing ramboss , then we will make tht a reason.
We will.play by the book because that will.bring us more then that little shyt ?lolzz

That is all good, but it doesn't answer my question. The US should pay for using our roads and infrastructure. If we don't collect any fee this is squarely on us.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom