US admits it has military plan to attack Iran

[Hasbara Buster]

Never in the military? Having a plan doesn't mean you want to use it. We have a plan in case we get invaded from Canada, does this mean we want to be? We have a plan in case we get nuked, does this mean we want to be? Think, man.

But Iran is no threat to the U.S. Why need a plan? I call it potential aggression, not defence. Iran, not only has never threatened the U.S. but is also not in the position to do so, or even think about it. Iran's military is entirely defensive. They have no serious offensive capabilities; Iranian military doctrine is entirely defensive.

 

[SOHEIL]

But Iran is no threat to the U.S. Why need a plan? I call it potential aggression, not defence. Iran, not only hasn't threatened the U.S. but it's not in the position to do so. You know it very well Juice, you are just trying to piss me off

ideology !

the problem is ideology

USA is FreeMason

IRAN is islamic

FreeMason =/= Islam

 

[Hasbara Buster]

Islam is anti-capitalist by nature, this is what many people don't know. Moreover, this is one of the reasons why the elite and (western) corporate world hate this religion. Islam is opposed to accumulation of wealth by an elite. Funny that all Muslim countries are hardcore capitalist including Saudi Arabia

 

[SOHEIL]

Islam is anti-capitalist by nature, this is what many people don't know. Moreover, this is one of the reasons why the elite and (western) corporate world hate this religion. Islam is opposed to accumulation of wealth by an elite. Funny that all Muslim countries are hardcore capitalist including Saudi Arabia

!!!

 

[deltacamelately]

get a life. the only country who is actively cooperating with the IAEI is Iran... and Amano signed today in Tehran additional protocols, GIVING THE IAEI MORE activity rights to act in Iran. Stupid idiots will remain stupid

Cooperating wiith the IAEI is not equivalent to abiding with the signatory obligations. Enriching Bomb grade Uranium, while still remaining part of NPT as FULL signatory nation warrants sanction and even military attack. Iran voluntarily gave up its legal right to enrich Bomb grade Uranium, the day they signed on the dotted lines. Contrast this with what Pakistan and India did. Both remained out of its ambit, calling it discriminatory and thus retaining the legal rights to go nuclear.

Your calling me stupid won't negate the fact that your regime is legally at odds to the signatory obligations, that they voluntarily associated themselves at the first place. Whether the US or Israel have the military capabilities to target you for such violations is a different debate. That your regime places itself as a legit military target is factual.

Mate what are you smoking?

Google up NPT vioalation. That would suffice.

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

^^

tell us why they violating the NPT.
do you want them to allow inspectors to inspect our scientists *** holes?
there is a line Iran will not cross.


anyway
If these talks in moscow don't have any good result for IRAN, then we should definitely leave the NPT.

 

[PapaDoc23]

Every nation has plans for war. The US has been developing plans for Iran since the Islamic Revolution in the '70s. The thing is we will only wage a aero-naval war with Iran. A ground war is out of the equation because of the Iraq debacle. We could try to invade Iran but it will be a bloody mess. The landmass is huge,mountains. Basically the Iranian army will put up a tough fight. The draft would need to brought back. Occupying Iran would be a mistake. An occupation of Iran would worse then Vietnam,Afghanistan,and Iraq put together. Iran has a paramilitary force of 11,390,000! Fighting a 11 million men and women insurgency would end in defeat. So they only war we will wage with Iran will be aero-naval operations.

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

Every nation has plans for war. The US has been developing plans for Iran since the Islamic Revolution in the '70s. The thing is we will only wage a aero-naval war with Iran. A ground war is out of the equation because of the Iraq debacle. We could try to invade Iran but it will be a bloody mess. The landmass is huge,mountains. Basically the Iranian army will put up a tough fight. The draft would need to brought back. Occupying Iran would be a mistake. An occupation of Iran would worse then Vietnam,Afghanistan,and Iraq put together. Iran has a paramilitary force of 11,390,000! Fighting a 11 million men and women insurgency would end in defeat. So they only war we will wage with Iran will be aero-naval operations.

I admire your logic, but the only problem is imagine 1000's of soldiers with manpads in mountain. that would give low flying planet nightmares.

 

[SOHEIL]

^^

idioooot USA

 

[deltacamelately]

^^

tell us why they violating the NPT.
do you want them to allow inspectors to inspect our scientists *** holes?
there is a line Iran will not cross.


anyway
If these talks in moscow don't have any good result for IRAN, then we should definitely leave the NPT.

There is enough intel and proof that the Iranian Regime bought warhead blueprint from AQ Khan.
The US has the paper trail up to and including the forged papers signed by AQ Khan himself and the signed deliveries of the cascades themselves.

A regime that kept its "peaceful" program hidden for years, admits its program only after being exposed and gains technological advances through trade with an illicit network that gave technology to other countries pursuing nuclear weapons, all the while violating what it signed up to do with the NPT, places the burden of proof on them. It is up to them to comply, and to date, they have not been fully forthcoming. So NO, its not required to inspect your sceintist's a$$holes.

Note: The overwhelming anti Iranian public opinion involves the Iranian Regime and its clerics. Your supporting the Clerics on the nuclear issue will only embolden the regime in seeking nukes which I am not sure what the common Iranian wants.