What's new

UN votes 152 to 5 telling Israel to get rid of its nuclear weapons

.
sensibly abstained from, not our circus..

yeh Palau and Micronesia kyu oppose kar rahe hai but :laugh: ?
These are nations who are happy to support for additional backdoors like minor funding and otherwise and don’t need convincing.
 
.
even if Pak and NK can develop and posses nukes why cant Israel...they are economically, technically far far superior than any country in the world of their size and living with open existential threats so they have full rights to posses nukes for self defence
 
.
even if Pak and NK can develop and posses nukes why cant Israel...they are economically, technically far far superior than any country in the world of their size and living with open existential threats so they have full rights to posses nukes for self defence
The problem is hypocrisy.
 
.
Proves about Israel nukes: Zero.

Gentiles believing another people made fantasies, nothing new.

When will they learn?

 
.
even if Pak and NK can develop and posses nukes why cant Israel...they are economically, technically far far superior than any country in the world of their size and living with open existential threats so they have full rights to posses nukes for self defence

Why is that you Indians play a double game when it comes to Israel? At the UN your country often votes against Israel and in favor of Palestine. Yet, here you are singing Israeli songs? You are a typical Hindutva worshipping the rising sun.

LOL You must be happy with the world voting against Israeli possession of nuclear weapons. That is a resounding NO.
 
.
The problem is hypocrisy.
There's no hypocrisy.

Countries that talk about the destruction of other countries must not have nukes.
North Korea is enough for the world. No need for terrorist Ayatollahs that kill 16 year old girls to have nukes
 
. .
There's no hypocrisy.

Countries that talk about the destruction of other countries must not have nukes.
North Korea is enough for the world. No need for terrorist Ayatollahs that kill 16 year old girls to have nukes

Agreed with this part.
better than some terrorist entity that fire hellfire toward little girls on tricycle at beach and evaporate them or boast about killing civilian in war

Proves about Israel nukes: Zero.

Gentiles believing another people made fantasies, nothing new.

When will they learn?

actually Olmert several years ago threatened Iran with nukes, that's enough evidence

There's no hypocrisy.

Countries that talk about the destruction of other countries must not have nukes.
North Korea is enough for the world. No need for terrorist Ayatollahs that kill 16 year old girls to have nukes
and always its stated that the destruction come from within the cancerous entity that plague middle-east since 75 years ago
 
.
:lol:

But there are no proves about Israel nukes.

How they can vote against something without proves? It's like vote against ghosts.


actually Olmert several years ago threatened Iran with nukes, that's enough evidence
So if someone threat with attack you with a alien ship, it means that alien ships exist.

Why gentiles are so easy to deceive? What doesnt work inside their minds?
 
.
:lol:

But there are no proves about Israel nukes.

How they can vote against something without proves? It's like vote against ghosts.



So if someone threat with attack you with a alien ship, it means that alien ships exist.

Why gentiles are so easy to deceive? What doesnt work inside their minds?
when the head of a state make such threat , you take it seriously .specially if the state kidnap the whistle blower from a foreign country , drug him, put him on a trial behind closed doors , that till today after around 40 years its detail is secret and put him behind thew bar for 18 years which 11 year of it he illegally held in solitary confinement , which incidentally is not a valid punishment in Israel penal code and was not mentioned in his verdict . and after release from the prison his speech and movement kept restricted and again several time arrested again illegally for havingğinterview with journalists .

is it enough or do i need to recite the history of nuke technology transfer from France to s. Africa and Israel ?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom