What's new

UAE minister backs Emmanuel Macron’s remarks on Muslims

I just called the CII a "council of clowns" how does that mean I want them to rule Pakistan? On the contrary. It is clear CII is a rubber stamp for Deep State policy and nothing more. By approving construction of a Hindu temple with Muslim tax revenue they have negated any Islamic credentials they claim to possess.
I am not in favor of Mullas or anyone else, I am in favor of Islam. Pure, unadulterated Islam and Shari'ah.
Religion is never represented by anyone that is affiliated with the government. I have studied Religion deeply and intensely and come to the realization that true Religion is always independent and critical of the ruling establishment, not a functionary of it
No thank you.

Expats making demands for Shariah rule in Pakistan seem quite hypocritical. Keep your opinions to yourself.
 
People should have the freedom to choose their way of life.

People should also choose places that suit their own cultural habits rather than turning other cultures into their own.

These are the two principles of mutual respect.

If Muslims do not like European culture, they should not emigrate to the West.If Europe does not like Muslims it should not accept their immigrants and then try to change the way Muslims live.

The people who are really harmful are those who are hypocritical, liberals and extremists.
 
No thank you.

Expats making demands for Shariah rule in Pakistan seem quite hypocritical. Keep your opinions to yourself.

And it's not hypocritical for Pakistani Muslim to not want Shari'ah, the law of the Religion he claims to be an adherent of? Isn't that the very definition of hypocrisy?
قول و فعل میں تضاد
 
Integration is just a soft word for facism, every human being is free to live their lives according to their own beliefs in a free society. Anyone who believes other than that is a facist. France is gearing up to become the next facist state along with India.

What the Western peoples seem to have reservation about Muslims in the West is the aggression in some and then the physical appearance in some : mustacheless beard and the niqab. In India in the last 15 years this has become overwhelmingly common and I as an old-style socialist / communist Muslim find this not to my liking. In fact abhorrent.

I think the Western peoples also find communication with such Muslims to be difficult. There is an aggressive otherness to such immigrant Muslims in the West.
 
Last edited:
And it's not hypocritical for Pakistani Muslim to not want Shari'ah, the law of the Religion he claims to be an adherent of? Isn't that the very definition of hypocrisy?
قول و فعل میں تضاد
Yet he lives in a Dar ul Harb?
 
Yet he lives in a Dar ul Harb?

Canada is Darul Harb? LOL have you lost your marbles?
BTW, this division between Darul Islam and Darul Kufr is not Shari'ah, its a fiqhi construct which I tend to reject. Some early Muslim scholars even said the whole world is Darul Islam.
 
Canada is Darul Harb? LOL have you lost your marbles?
BTW, this division between Darul Islam and Darul Kufr is not Shari'ah, its a fiqhi construct which I tend to reject. Some early Muslim scholars even said the whole world is Darul Islam.
Picking and choosing now.

Hippo crate.
 
Canada is Darul Harb? LOL have you lost your marbles?
BTW, this division between Darul Islam and Darul Kufr is not Shari'ah, its a fiqhi construct which I tend to reject. Some early Muslim scholars even said the whole world is Darul Islam.

So it becomes "I" (tend to reject) & "some" (early muslim scholars) when the requirement is type#1? and "2 billion" when requirement is of type#2? is that a misinterpretation? or required to be read in proper context?
 
Last edited:
So it becomes "I" (tend to reject) & "some" (early muslim scholars) when the requirement is type#`? and "2 billion" when requirement is of type#2? is that a misinterpretation? or required to be read in proper context?

I didn't get you
 
I swear everytime I heard this swine Anwar Gargash squeal, it boils my blood.

I am 110% sure, he is the brain child of all the UAE policy towards India and Israel. Make no mistake, he should be treated as the enemy of Pakistan as well.

Anwar Gargash would actually be more correctly spelled Anwar Qarqash (أنور قرقاش), but his family has taken the option of using the English letter G for the Arabic ق. Word on the street in the UAE is that this family is not even ethnically Arab, but N'th generation Indian Muslims, who emigrated to the British-controlled Trucial States at the time of the British Raj. You still see traces of the Indian origin in the names of their family members - Anwar, or Shahab, CEO of their family conglomerate, are, after all, not common choices for Arabic boys' names. Their Indian origin could explain why Gargash reacted the way he did when Pakistan declared neutrality on the Yemen war issue.

As for UAE-Israeli "normalization", the main architects are largely the dynamic duo of Yusuf al Oteiba and MBZ himself. The Israeli shill and Palestinian traitor Mohammed Dahlan almost certainly played a supporting part as well.

However, as far as treating Emirati officials as enemies of Pakistan is concerned, that would be an own goal on our part. The Indians have worked very hard and very patiently, over decades, to cleave the UAE from Pakistan with varying degrees of success in various areas (very successful in business & finance, not so successful - yet - in military cooperation). The Israelis, likewise, ultimately want a war between Arabs and Ajamis, and will surely be looking to replace Pakistani forces in their traditional role as the ultimate security guarantors in the GCC.

We would be doing ourselves immeasurable harm if we let them succeed.
 
May these Muslim leaders remember the shared passions of their forefathers. It is not wise to just go against Turkey's policy
 
Anwar Gargash would actually be more correctly spelled Anwar Qarqash (أنور قرقاش), but his family has taken the option of using the English letter G for the Arabic ق. Word on the street in the UAE is that this family is not even ethnically Arab, but N'th generation Indian Muslims, who emigrated to the British-controlled Trucial States at the time of the British Raj. You still see traces of the Indian origin in the names of their family members - Anwar, or Shahab, CEO of their family conglomerate, are, after all, not common choices for Arabic boys' names. Their Indian origin could explain why Gargash reacted the way he did when Pakistan declared neutrality on the Yemen war issue.

As for UAE-Israeli "normalization", the main architects are largely the dynamic duo of Yusuf al Oteiba and MBZ himself. The Israeli shill and Palestinian traitor Mohammed Dahlan almost certainly played a supporting part as well.

However, as far as treating Emirati officials as enemies of Pakistan is concerned, that would be an own goal on our part. The Indians have worked very hard and very patiently, over decades, to cleave the UAE from Pakistan with varying degrees of success in various areas (very successful in business & finance, not so successful - yet - in military cooperation). The Israelis, likewise, ultimately want a war between Arabs and Ajamis, and will surely be looking to replace Pakistani forces in their traditional role as the ultimate security guarantors in the GCC.

We would be doing ourselves immeasurable harm if we let them succeed.

That explains a lot about this chap and his Indian links are certainly cause of concern.

Its not for us to be sensitive about "what if" situations. When someone is openly working against Pakistani interest and bad mouthing Pakistan, sort that person out there and then. Take no prisoners, don't waste time on them. We need to tell UAE straight on their face that look, we don't like certain individuals and get them out of your hierarchy for your own good.
 
Last edited:
I swear everytime I heard this swine Anwar Gargash squeal, it boils my blood.

Let me remind all the Pakistanis, he is the turd which threatened Pakistan when we refused to join their dirty war in Yemen.

I am 110% sure, he is the brain child of all the UAE policy towards India and Israel. Make no mistake, he should be treated as the enemy of Pakistan as well.

The majority of Arab Monarchs and their supporters are thugs and only have their appearance like Muslims, their spirit has died, they are happy in kissing feet of their Western masters. Both Gargash and Muhammad Bin Salman are true dirty faces of Arab puppet rulers. One day their own people shall kick them out.
People should have the freedom to choose their way of life.

People should also choose places that suit their own cultural habits rather than turning other cultures into their own.

These are the two principles of mutual respect.

If Muslims do not like European culture, they should not emigrate to the West.If Europe does not like Muslims it should not accept their immigrants and then try to change the way Muslims live.

The people who are really harmful are those who are hypocritical, liberals and extremists.

Rules are no rules Muslims are living in France from centuries and if you claim to be democratic and liberal state then one should provide equal opportunities and respect to all.

It is understandable if China goes for some sanctions upon few Muslim groups in China threatening the communist policies or some religions may face few restriction in Islamic state but if a state is claiming to be liberal then it should act in same way. To be honest many French are still living in the era of crusades or French kingdom. Though laws are there but by heart they have hate for Islam, Macron is the modern knight ready to cut throats of Muslims but times have changed and he shall also feel heat.
whats wrong in what he say?
How you shall feel if any one disrespects Jewish sacred personalities or religion it self.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom