What's new

UAE criticises Ahmadinejad visit to Iran's own Persian Gulf island!!

You think the above will wash away the fact that Bandar went to the states and said that they wil go to any extreme ie have no principles when it comes to one family's survival???

These Islands are no issue. they can be resolved. what needs to be resolved is corrupt leaders whether in Pakistan or Saudi who side with Americans. Those Americans who make Pakistani children orphans

If you know the fact that Americans are behind the Pakistani children made orphans by the drones, repeated intrusions of the airspace and repeated killing of our soldiers and civilians, why doesn't pakistan shut the bl00dy embassy and consulates of US and the public lynch it's ambasador? what stops Pakistani government and people from doing it?
 
^^ bla bla bla. You are a stooge of Israelis and Americans and nothing else or more. When they sucked your oil dry then they will leave you all alone, but remember, Iran will still be there,cracking its knuckles and ready to deal with you. So be a good boy and be proud of your 50 year old country

He is just a Pakistani worker of UAE look at his flags. They do not give citizenship like they do in UK. Because they treat Muslims brothers in a special way in UAE

If you know the fact that Americans are behind the Pakistani children made orphans by the drones, repeated intrusions of the airspace and repeated killing of our soldiers and civilians, why doesn't pakistan shut the bl00dy embassy and consulates of US and the public lynch it's ambasador? what stops Pakistani government and people from doing it?

traitor like Zardari Like Sauds :rofl:
 
And look at state of Libya today Muslim Arabs being killed everyday without the world caring about them cos oil is being stolen. Why do not Arabs now send delegations to Libya to make peace between the Libyans tribes etc. They don't care that's why. To them a few Arabs being killed is no issue

The holocaust and destruction of Arabs, as prophecised by our Prop;het Mohammed (pbuh), is fast approaching. Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine yemen.. one by one they are falling like dominoes and Arabs are getting slaughtered like goats. While they think we are ill-advising them when we say KSA and other stooges are next-on-line, they will only wake up when the physical assault takes place upon them.:coffee:

Till then, no amount of reasoning or advice can wake them up from their egotistic nature.
 
April 13, 2012

Historical quest for dominance in Gulf

Territorial and political ambitions, combined with economic interests in the government, led Iran to claim islands

The Arabian Gulf, all its waters, islands and coasts, became a purely Arab “lake” with the Islamic conquests in the 7th century AD, Dr Abdullah Al Taboor, Emirati writer and researcher of UAE’s modern and contemporary history, said.

“On the fall of the Ya’aruba state in Oman (1624–1741), a new Arab maritime power rose to fill the vacuum. The new power was the Qawasim state based in Ras Al Khaimah. By the middle of the 18th century, the Qawasim fleet was the principal naval power in the Gulf.”

The Qawasim eventually extended their influence to several regions in the Indian subcontinent and the East African coast. However, their power was concentrated on the southern coast of the Gulf, Ras Al Khaimah and Sharjah being their major cities.

In 1750 a faction of the Qawasim moved north, where they settled down in the area of Lingeh. The settlers eventually established an independent state in that region and sought to extend their influence to the islands and coastal areas of the Gulf.

Historical references point to a sharing of the Gulf islands by the two Qawasim factions: The islands of Sirri and Hengam became the property of the Lingeh Qawasim, while Abu Mousa, Greater and Lesser Tunbs, and Sir Abu Nu’air came under the Qawasim of the southern coast (Ras Al Khaimah and Sharjah).

Such arrangements were already in being by 1835.

Thus, the Qawasim of the coastal areas established and maintained unopposed legal and actual sovereignty over the islands.

In 1864, their ruler sent an official message to the British Resident informing him that the islands of Abu Mousa, Greater and Lesser Tunbs, and Sir Abu Nu’air had been ruled by his ancestors, and would, therefore, remain under his rule.

Territorial and political ambitions, combined with the economic interests of influential elements within the government, helped strengthen the first Iranian claim to the island of Abu Mousa in 1904. Iran began to challenge Sharjah’s sovereignty over the island, with its eyes on the island’s resources, particularly the red oxide. It thus dispatched a mission, headed by a Belgian officer, to hoist the Iranian flag on the island. The ruler of Sharjah protested against this action, and his reaction was supported by the British Resident.

The latter called upon Iran to submit evidence supporting its title to the island. Three months later, Iran quietly withdrew from the conflict, having failed to produce any evidence supporting its claim.

Throughout the period of the British presence in the Gulf, the British Resident kept sending messages to the rulers of Sharjah and Ras Al Khaimah stressing his country’s recognition of their title to the three islands.

In 1912, Britain and the ruler of Sharjah agreed to establish a lighthouse on Greater Tunb, with the assurance that this would not entail any encroachment on the ruler’s sovereignty over the island.

In 1923, the ruler of Sharjah granted a five-year red oxide exploration concession to a British national named Strick. Iran protested against the granting by the ruler of Sharjah of prospecting concessions in Abu Musa. This was followed by a lull in the dispute.

On August 24, 1928 the British administration issued a memorandum on the status of the three islands. In that memorandum it was stated that the islands of Greater and Lesser Tunbs had belonged to Ras Al Khaimah since its emergence as an entity independent of Sharjah, while Abu Musa belonged to Sharjah, whose ruler was entitled to the proceeds of exploiting the red oxide and had been for a long period of time.

The period 1929–1930 witnessed negotiations between Britain and Iran aimed at reaching an Anglo-Iranian treaty. During these negotiations, evidence emerged supporting the Qawasim’s title to the three islands, and hence highlighting the weakness of the Iranian claims. In the draft of the treaty it was decided to recognize Iran’s title to the island of Sirri, while the three other islands (the Tunbs and Abu Mousa) would remain Arab.

The negotiations were almost a tug-of-war exercise between the two parties.

The British held intensive talks with Iran and the emirates of Sharjah and Ras Al Khaimah in 1970–71, through its representative, Sir William Luce, seeking to secure a toning down of Iran’s threats to occupy the three islands by force, Sir William Luce set forth several compromise proposals aimed at finding acceptable negotiation terms. The negotiations were overshadowed by aggressive statements by the Shah of Iran, whose prestige had been harshly bruised by failure to obtain Bahrain.

British Foreign Office documents for 1969 (released early in 2000) indicated that the rulers of Sharjah and Ras Al Khaimah continued to refuse to hand over the three islands, in spite of repeated British and Iranian pressures on them to accept an amicable settlement of the issue; one that would prevent direct military occupation by Iran depriving the two rulers of their sovereignty over the islands. Iran went as far as to send an envoy to the ruler of Ra s al Khaimah urging him to sign a letter declaring Iran’s sovereignty over the two Tunbs. The ruler, however, refused to do so in spite of all Iranian threats and deadlines. Britain had also repeatedly attempted to convince the two rulers to settle the dispute with Iran before its scheduled withdrawal from the region by the end of 1971. Such attempts clearly show that Britain wanted the two rulers to make significant concessions and to depart from the very position it had itself been supporting until 1969, namely the rejection of any bid to give up or to share sovereignty over the three islands. As the released documents indicate, Britain’s aim was to prevent the Shah of Iran from seizing the three islands by force before its departure from the region, as such an occupation would involve it (Britain) in an Arab-Iranian confrontation, and thus hamper its plans for an orderly and safe withdrawal.26 In the meantime, such arrangements would strengthen Britain’s ties with Iran at the expense of the Arabs’rights to the islands.

British endeavours ultimately resulted in a Memorandum of Understanding which was signed by Iran and Sharjah on November 30, 1971. Under this agreement, Iranian troops could land on the northern part of Abu Mousa. Ras Al Khaimah, however, maintained its position of rejecting any concessions with regard to its title to the Tunbs. Iran responded to this outright rejection and refutation of its claims by forcibly occupying the two islands in an offensive that claimed the lives of two servicemen and five other citizens from Greater Tunb. The offensive also resulted in the demolition of a police station and a primary school on that island, and the eviction of its citizens, who sought refuge in Ras Al Khaimah.

Ever since, the UAE has been working to settle the dispute either through negotiations or international arbitration, but Iran keeps rejecting these efforts.

http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/uae/government/historical-quest-for-dominance-in-gulf-1.1007901

He is just a Pakistani worker of UAE look at his flags. They do not give citizenship like they do in UK. Because they treat Muslims brothers in a special way in UAE



traitor like Zardari Like Sauds :rofl:

He is jsut a portion of the big bowl of urine, then what about traitors who vote for him?
 
The holocaust and destruction of Arabs, as prophecised by our Prop;het Mohammed (pbuh), is fast approaching. Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine yemen.. one by one they are falling like dominoes and Arabs are getting slaughtered like goats. While they think we are ill-advising them when we say KSA and other stooges are next-on-line, they will only wake up when the physical assault takes place upon them.:coffee:

Till then, no amount of reasoning or advice can wake them up from their egotistic nature.

And he wants to make it about a few pieces of rock lol
 
And what do the scriptures say about the Muslims side with Muslim killers?? And following instructions from non Muslims to insult a leader and President of Muslim people??
Are you trying to define yourself sir?


Because it is no historical secret that some elements in the disguise of Islam collaborated with Halaku in Iraq in the massacre of Muslim and then the same elements would be imported by safavid shah ismael to give him legitimacy for his rule and unleash the worst ever massacres recorded in the history of Islam. Im both cases, the demographics of Iraq and Iran per changed permanently due to mass extermination of Muslims.

The holocaust and destruction of Arabs, as prophecised by our Prop;het Mohammed (pbuh), is fast approaching. Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine yemen.. one by one they are falling like dominoes and Arabs are getting slaughtered like goats. While they think we are ill-advising them when we say KSA and other stooges are next-on-line, they will only wake up when the physical assault takes place upon them.:coffee:

Till then, no amount of reasoning or advice can wake them up from their egotistic nature.

If you think Arab holocaust is happening then Iranian holocaust is next. Don't worry.

Islam has suffered few major setbacks due to these same "muslim" elements conspiring from behind.

Below we will have a breif look of some "glorious" Muslim whose hands are tainted with the bloods of hundred thousand innocents.

Ismail I

It was, however, nothing less than a reign of terror that inaugurated the new dispensation. On capturing Tabriz in 907/1501, a city two-thirds Sunnite in population, Shah Esmāʿil threatened with death all who might resist the adoption of Shiʿite prayer ritual in the main congregational mosque, and he had Qezelbāš soldiers patrol the congregation to ensure that none raise his voice against the cursing of the first three caliphs, viewed as enemies of the Prophet’s family. In Tabriz and elsewhere, gangs of professional execrators known as the tabarrāʾiān would accost the townsfolk at random, forcing them to curse the objectionable personages on pain of death. Selective killings of prominent Sunnites occurred in a large number of places, notably Qazvin and Isfahan, and in Shiraz and Yazd, outright massacres took place. Sunnite mosques were desecrated, and the tombs of eminent Sunnite scholars destroyed (Aubin, 1970, pp. 237-38; idem, 1988, pp. 94-101).

Abbas I of Persia
Shiism did not become fully established until the reign of Abbas I of Persia (1587–1629).[56] Abbas hated the Sunnis, and forced the population to accept Twelver Shiism. Thus by 1602 most of the formerly Sunnis of Iran had accepted Shiism. A significant number, however, did not accept Safavid rule, prompting Abbas to institute a number of administrative changes in order to further transform Iran into a Twelver Shia state.[57][58]

Muhammad Baqir Majlisi
Under the guidance of Muhammad Baqir Majlisi (1616–98, one of the most important Shiite clerics of all time), who devoted himself to (among other things) the eradication of Sunnism in Iran,[59] the Safavid state made major efforts, in the 17th century to Persianize Shiite practice and culture in order to facilitate its spread in Iran among its Sunni populace.[60] It was only under Majlisi that Shi'a Islam truly took hold among the masses.[61]


Methods of converting Iran

Ismail consolidated his rule over the country and launched a thorough and at times brutal campaign to convert the majority Sunni population to Twelver Shiism and thus transform the religious landscape of Iran.[14] His methods of converting Iran included:
 Imposing Shiism as the state and mandatory religion for the whole nation and much forcible conversions of Iranian Sufi Sunnis to Shiism.[15][16][17]

 He reintroduced the Sadr (Arabic, leader) – an office that was responsible for supervising religious institutions and endowments. With a view to transforming Iran into a Shiite state, the Sadr was also assigned the task of disseminating Twelver doctrine.[18]


 He destroyed Sunni mosques. This was even noted by Tomé Pires, the Portuguese ambassador to China who visited Iran in 1511–12, who when referring to Ismail noted: "He (i.e. Ismail) reforms our churches, destroys the houses of all Moors who follow (the Sunnah of) Muhammad…"[19]

 He enforced the ritual and compulsory cursing of the first three Sunni Caliphs (Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman) as usurpers, from all mosques, disbanded Sunni Tariqahs and seized their assets, used state patronage to develop Shia shrines, institutions and religious art and imported Shia scholars to replace Sunni scholars.[20][21][22]


 He shed Sunni blood and destroyed and desecrated the graves and mosques of Sunnis. This caused the Ottoman Sultan Bayezid II (who initially congratulated Ismail on his victories) to advise and ask the young monarch (in a “fatherly” manner) to stop the anti-Sunni actions. However, Ismail was strongly anti-Sunni, ignored the Sultan's warning, and continued to spread the Shia faith by the sword.[23][24]

 He persecuted, imprisoned and executed stubbornly resistant Sunnis.[25][26]


 With the establishment of Safavid rule, there was a very raucous and colourful, almost carnival-like holiday on 26 Dhu al-Hijjah (or alternatively, 9 Rabi' al-awwal) celebrating the murder of Caliph Umar. The highlight of the day was making an effigy of Umar to be cursed, insulted, and finally burned. However, as relations between Iran and Sunni countries improved, the holiday was no longer observed (at least officially).[27]

 In 1501 Ismail invited all the Shia living outside Iran to come to Iran and be assured of protection from the Sunni majority.[28]

The Fall of Baghdad

Ian Frazier said:
The caliph’s vizier, or chief minister, was himself a Shiite of uncertain loyalty. Islamic opinion afterward held that the vizier, al-Alkamzi, vilely betrayed the caliph and conspired with the Mongols; an exhortation in Muslim school books used to say, “Let him be cursed of God who curses not al-Alkamzi.” As fighting began, Hulagu, acknowledging the importance of Shiite support, prudently posted guard detachments of a hundred Mongol horsemen at the most sacred Shiite shrines in Najef and Karbala.

Many sources agree that there was fear of an earthquake or other shock to nature occurring if the caliph’s sacred blood was spilled. Learned Shiites advised Hulagu that no catastrophes had followed the bloody deaths of John the Baptist, Jesus Christ, or the Shiite saint Hosein, so he should go ahead. To be safe, Hulagu had the caliph wrapped in a carpet and then trodden to death by horses. He also killed all the caliph’s family, except for his youngest son and a daughter. The daughter was shipped off to Mongolia to be a slave in the harem of Mongke Khan.

In the cities he had won along the Tigris and Euphrates, he put his viceroys in power, and rewarded some of the helpful Shiites. For the Persian Shiite astronomer Nasir-al-Din Tusi, who had abetted the Mongols ever since they freed him from the Assassins, Hulagu built a costly observatory, which later produced the first scientifically accurate explanation of the rainbow.[


Michael Doran said:
A Shiite minister to the last Abbasid caliph, Alqami betrayed his ruler by conspiring with Hulagu, the Mongol leader who in 1258 sacked Baghdad and destroyed the Abbasid Empire, the flower of Islamic civilization.

I purposely quoted western sources because they are ought to be based on objective research than sectarian influences.
 
You mate are the height of stupidity. I don't give a frack for Iran or Arabs I am Pakistani first. However an enemy of my enemy is my friend and a friend of my enemy is my enemy. Is that too complicated for you? look after Pakistan first the rest will take care of itself

Then why don't Pakistanis look after Pakistan in the first place before talking about other countries?
 
Do you guys not understand whether you look at it from the left or right there is a non Muslim stirring and encouraging divison with us. And you want those that are their allies to speak for Muslims lol
 
I understand Al Bhatti,

After USA pulls its forces out of "the Gulf ",

Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar and Bahrain will Face Iran's fury. SA may respond to Iran threat, but others are too weak.

Also, Bahrain is on the Edge of revolution. Up north Israel, Syria and Shia Iraq blocks their path( Jordan, Kuwait and SA)

They need Turkey to fight on the north. But I am not in mood for such fight. :)
 
Then why don't pakistanis look after pakistan in the first place?

Many are trying and it is a fact that majority in Pakistan hate Americans. Just remember Shah in Iran was in power for a long time and people didn't like American interference. but in due course they kicked out the traitor ally of the Americans Inshaallah we will do same
 
If you think Arab holocaust is happening then Iranian holocaust is next. Don't worry.

Islam has suffered few major setbacks due to these same "muslim" elements conspiring from behind.

Below we will have a breif look of some "glorious" Muslim whose hands are tainted with the bloods of hundred thousand innocents.

What we look is the present situation, not the past. At present, it is vividly evident that Arab monarchies are in bed with Zionists and Iran is the only one who is resisting them.

And no, our Prophet Mohammed did not predict any Iranian or Persian holocaust, but he did predict the holocaust of Arabs after which "very few" Arabs will be left. This should be a warning for those who support Al-Saud, which is allied with Zionists.

The holocaust and destruction of Arabs is underway. Yet they are sleeping. They will continue to sleep until the physical assault starts upon KSA and Gulf Arabs. This is what our Prophet saw 1400 years ago.
 
I cannot believe anybody still supports Abdullah after knowing that he urged US to attack and destroy Iran. "cut off the head of the snake" as he called it.

It just doesn't get in my head how can someone support Abdullah and his monarchy after learning this vile truth.
 
I cannot believe anybody still supports Abdullah after knowing that he urged US to attack and destroy Iran. "cut off the head of the snake" as he called it.

It just doesn't get in my head how can someone support Abdullah and his monarchy after learning this vile truth.

I agree how could a Muslim leader wish a Nuke on Tehran and kill Muslims
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom