What's new

Two umpiring decisions might cost Bangladesh the quarter-final vs India

Homo Sapiens

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,641
Reaction score
-1
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
ICC Cricket World Cup 2015: Two umpiring decisions might cost Bangladesh the quarter-final vs India - Latest Cricket News, Articles & Videos at CricketCountry.com


HomeNews
ICC Cricket World Cup 2015: Two umpiring decisions might cost Bangladesh the quarter-final vs India
Nishad Pai Vaidya
March 19, 2015, 1:58 pm


Rohit-Sharma-of-India-bats35.jpg

Rohit Sharma scored 137 against Bangladesh © Getty Images

Melbourne: There are always ifs and buts, but Bangladesh may consider themselves unlucky after the Indian innings in the ICC Cricket World Cup 2015 quarter-final. There were two decisions, which could have gone in their favour, and possibly turned the tide in their direction. Instead, India breathed a sigh of relief and the two batsmen went on to make a big impact on the game. If India go on to win this game, the debate about those two calls may rage on with the umpires and the Decision Review System (DRS) in focus. READ: Rohit Sharma scores 100, only behind Ricky Ponting as he sets Indian record during ICC World Cup 2015 quarter-final 2

When Suresh Raina was on 10, Mashrafe hit him in front of the stumps. The umpire did not give it out. As a result, Bangladesh went upstairs. On the first look, it seemed out as it hit him in front and the ball would have gone on to hit the stumps. They then checked with the ball trackers, which showed that the ball had marginally pitched outside the leg-stump. There was some part inside the line, but a part of it was outside. As a result, the third umpire had to back the on-field call and not overturn it. Had Raina been given out and then referred it, he would have had to head to the pavilion. READ: IND vs BAN, quarter-final 2: Rohit Sharma scores 7th ODI century

The second contentious call came in the 40th over, when Rubel Hossain bowled a high full toss to Rohit Sharma. Rohit pulled it to square-leg, where he was caught quite easily. The umpire signalled it a no-ball for height. Replays showed that it was just on the waist at the point of contact with the bat and Bangladesh could have had their man. Rohit was on 90 then and he went on to make 137. Raina survived the call on 10 and went on to get 65. Those two batsmen changed the course of the game at a time when Bangladesh were looking to restrict India. READ: CONTROVERSY! Rohit Sharma saved as Bangladesh robbed in World Cup quarter-final

Bangladesh would say that had they dismissed those batsmen, they may have had India for much lesser than 302. They now face a tall task to win the quarterfinal.
 
. .
The first one : LBW clearly shows that the ball was pitched out side the leg stump.

Regarding Rohit sharma catch , BD should have gone for review.

Any way the match has been a one sided one except between 15th to 32nd over of Indian batting. It is not like those decisions have impacted the match result greatly.
 
.
The first one : LBW clearly shows that the ball was pitched out side the leg stump.

Regarding Rohit sharma catch , BD should have gone for review.

Can take one review only. Took the LBW review. No chance umpires will change their decisions in BD favor.
 
. . . . .
Cry babys start crying before the match been ended...
 
.
The LBW appeal was rightly denied(it was denied by the third umpire after all), the no-ball decision may be contentious but even if you deduct 47 runs which Rohit Sharma made after the no-ball incident India's score would be 256, while Bangladesh couldn't even score 200 runs............you would have lost anyway, by 63 runs instead of 109 runs if that decisions went to Bangladesh's favour......
Those two decisions would have mattered if you could put up a good fight.......
 
Last edited:
.
LBW review was an out, so was Sharma and Mahmudullah hit a six but was given an out.
 
. . . . .
Back
Top Bottom