What's new

Two umpiring decisions might cost Bangladesh the quarter-final vs India

I think it is a Rawami conspiracy. I saw Hasina passing a briefcase to Aleem Dar at the stadium.
 
ICC Cricket World Cup 2015: Two umpiring decisions might cost Bangladesh the quarter-final vs India - Latest Cricket News, Articles & Videos at CricketCountry.com


HomeNews
ICC Cricket World Cup 2015: Two umpiring decisions might cost Bangladesh the quarter-final vs India
Nishad Pai Vaidya
March 19, 2015, 1:58 pm


Rohit-Sharma-of-India-bats35.jpg

Rohit Sharma scored 137 against Bangladesh © Getty Images

Melbourne: There are always ifs and buts, but Bangladesh may consider themselves unlucky after the Indian innings in the ICC Cricket World Cup 2015 quarter-final. There were two decisions, which could have gone in their favour, and possibly turned the tide in their direction. Instead, India breathed a sigh of relief and the two batsmen went on to make a big impact on the game. If India go on to win this game, the debate about those two calls may rage on with the umpires and the Decision Review System (DRS) in focus. READ: Rohit Sharma scores 100, only behind Ricky Ponting as he sets Indian record during ICC World Cup 2015 quarter-final 2

When Suresh Raina was on 10, Mashrafe hit him in front of the stumps. The umpire did not give it out. As a result, Bangladesh went upstairs. On the first look, it seemed out as it hit him in front and the ball would have gone on to hit the stumps. They then checked with the ball trackers, which showed that the ball had marginally pitched outside the leg-stump. There was some part inside the line, but a part of it was outside. As a result, the third umpire had to back the on-field call and not overturn it. Had Raina been given out and then referred it, he would have had to head to the pavilion. READ: IND vs BAN, quarter-final 2: Rohit Sharma scores 7th ODI century

The second contentious call came in the 40th over, when Rubel Hossain bowled a high full toss to Rohit Sharma. Rohit pulled it to square-leg, where he was caught quite easily. The umpire signalled it a no-ball for height. Replays showed that it was just on the waist at the point of contact with the bat and Bangladesh could have had their man. Rohit was on 90 then and he went on to make 137. Raina survived the call on 10 and went on to get 65. Those two batsmen changed the course of the game at a time when Bangladesh were looking to restrict India. READ: CONTROVERSY! Rohit Sharma saved as Bangladesh robbed in World Cup quarter-final

Bangladesh would say that had they dismissed those batsmen, they may have had India for much lesser than 302. They now face a tall task to win the quarterfinal.

What about Umesh Yadav wicket on its first spell?
 
brother we are 2 different countries but our mentality is same har jao tuh match fix hai :-):-) lolz but BD bowlers has ball very well thumbs up to them.
Well, India has always being enjoying such decisions in the World Cup, also the BCCI is very strong, they themselves alone were the one's to stop the review system being enforced into International cricket, while all other major teams wanted it.
 
Well, India has always being enjoying such decisions in the World Cup, also the BCCI is very strong, they themselves alone were the one's to stop the review system being enforced into International cricket, while all other major teams wanted it.
You came into quter final due to wrong decision that way, JORDAN RUN OUT :cheesy::cheers:
 
Considering the fact that 1 East Bengali = 10 Indians, India was playing against 110 East Bengali's.

14 Indian (as you say) v/s 110 East Bengali's.

Yet 14 Indians won.


You still around??/
 
You came into quter final due to wrong decision that way, JORDAN RUN OUT :cheesy::cheers:
He was run-out, his bat was in the air. Also, it took ages for the 3rd Umpire to decide his fate but only a few seconds for Mahmudullah's and the no-ball decision was given without consulting the square-leg (I don't know if I am using the correct term) Umpire.
 
Well, India has always being enjoying such decisions in the World Cup, also the BCCI is very strong, they themselves alone were the one's to stop the review system being enforced into International cricket, while all other major teams wanted it.
east Pakistan har gaya tuh kya west Pakistan ki bari abhi baki hai :D today all pakistanis prayed for BD but hard luck to you guys. your team is improving day by day
 
He was run-out, his bat was in the air. Also, it took ages for the 3rd Umpire to decide his fate but only a few seconds for Mahmudullah's and the no-ball decision was given without consulting the square-leg (I don't know if I am using the correct term) Umpire.
Your Logic :

Bangladesh wins, ITS FAIR, India Wins, Its fixed F**K IT

10422381_860515813997594_6694999460462124187_n.jpg
 
Can take one review only. Took the LBW review. No chance umpires will change their decisions in BD favor.
Rewind and see it again....
1. even if the ball was not out of leg side...batsman was clearly way out of crease so no way you give him out.

2. even if ball was below belt...it was given out by Pakistani Umpire

So chill and accept your condition....stop flying
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom