What's new

Two Indian soldiers killed in LoC skirmish: Indian army

2008 Mumbai attack was used to the fulles. Now this will be used. Psy-ops. :D

Dozens of IA and BSF soldiers killed in skirmishes Mumbai attacks. Nothing happened. Nobody cares.
 
. .
Lol. Like anyone would give a damn care in 2014 that what happened in 2013 at LOC. :lol:
You guys are delusional. One is hoping for Pakistan to end on itself because of some stupid violence in Karachi, other is planning to impose sanctions with the help of uncle sam after a period of one year.
I have raised a valid point. How come they left the two soldiers alive. And if we believe in your assumption. Why the other 4 oldiers didn't reacted to beheading of their fellow soldiers by the enemy.

Yaar story to achi bana lo. Itni filmain bantai ho. Kuck to faida uthao experience ka.
Are yaar. If you have two dead bodies and two critically injured soldiers, its the priority to take them back to safe place for medical attention. Meanwhile they were gone, the enemy beheaded the dead body.

Thoda deemag laga.
 
. .
the only criminals are the indian occupation troops in kashmir---and the paksitanis giving RIP are traitors ---these beasts should be ripped appart for their beastly crimes in kashmir--have you forgotten the unmarked graves all over kashmir ----- the sooner they are all killed off the better -----
 
. .
Then how did the alleged manage to get close enough to the bodies to actually sever the heads? The remaining four could not have let that happen. Patrol parties work in close formations.

In case there weren't an extra 4 then wouldn't you ask that if they had enough rage and time to behead two (or one) why not at least make sure that the other two were dead as well?

It is all BS. Two soldiers might have died. Beheading is added to make it more brutal and inhumane on part of Pakistan.
 
.
Sir forget bombing by US and India not gonna happen, but its a way better reason for Economic sanctions.

Just like US and Europe did with Iran. That will break Pakistan's economy's back.

Do tell us a time you managed to achieve this. You can go back in history if you want.
 
. .
If you have ensured an escape or survival route for yourself, you may not be averse to considering that option anymore.
Moreover, it is very likely as has been demonstrated through disasters like Kargil that our higher ups generally do not have a clue..
at all.. and there seems to be a period attached to that as well.

That's the kind of nightmarish scenario that can make nuclear war possible - if the people who have the authority to order a nuclear strike know for sure that they and their family members will be safe in underground bunkers, and are not answerable to the people at large. Out of curiosity, who in pak has the final authority to authorize a nuclear attack? The president? PM? Service chiefs? Corps commander? (I'm guessing it's at least above the last one.)

In India, although I'm not sure of the chain of command, and only know that it has to be approved by the civilian authorities (through the NSA), the circumstances under which it will be authorized are very clear - as retaliation for a nuke attack on India.

By the way, many Pakistani posters here would disagree with your categorization of the Kargil war as a disaster. According to them, it was a blazing success for Pakistan.
 
.
Are yaar. If you have two dead bodies and two critically injured soldiers, its the priority to take them back to safe place for medical attention. Meanwhile they were gone, the enemy beheaded the dead body.

Thoda deemag laga.

That is not how it happens. The patrols are there for a reason. They don't run back to base on the first hint of an attack, they stand guard and stand fast waiting for backup. 4 still alive and able to fight would not have ran back.

@Pfpilot: Although this discussion is for another place and another time, the tac nukes might offer a different angle to our situation. In short an example: CSD was devised to fly below the nuke threshold while attaining max damage and goals. We cannot match them conventionally. So enter the tactical nukes and the threshold has massively been lowered. Less room to maneuver, more thought behind an Indian attack and CSD goes out of the window, not by direct action but by prevention. In a way letting the IA know that any poke here or there would still insure MAD contrary to your plans of avoiding it i.e. Tac nukes used to the same effect as strat nukes. However, this obviously does make everything a whole lot more jittery in the region. Its a gamble and a big one at that but we aren't exactly flush with options. That is my take on one of the possible reasons behind the introduction of these weapons.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
Are yaar. If you have two dead bodies and two critically injured soldiers, its the priority to take them back to safe place for medical attention. Meanwhile they were gone, the enemy beheaded the dead body.

Thoda deemag laga.

So they knew the enemy was still in the area and still they were busy shifting injured soldiers instead of fighting the enemy in front.

Cool story buddy. :D
 
. .
It is all BS. Two soldiers might have died. Beheading is added to make it more brutal and inhumane on part of Pakistan.

It was part of indian script to create propaganda and use this as shield for their intrusion and killing.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom