What's new

Turkish schools to stop teaching evolution, oficial says

Status
Not open for further replies.
According to me, if Darwin's theory is true, there should have been several other genders beside being male and female only because of the natural selection process.

But it is not!
Do Hermaphrodites count?
 
According to me, if Darwin's theory is true, there should have been several other genders beside being male and female only because of the natural selection process.

But it is not!

Explain why there should be different genders than Male and female for no obvious reasons?. The lack of unncessary genders only prove evolution. Animals like Ants and Bees have a third non-reproductive females who make up the entire labour force in the Colony but Humans have no reason to have such a gender.
 
Explain why there should be different genders than Male and female for no obvious reasons?. The lack of unncessary genders only prove evolution. Animals like Ants and Bees have a third non-reproductive females who make up the entire labour force in the Colony but Humans have no reason to have such a gender.
Actually super males (XYY) and super females (XXX) do happen among human but they are more of an abnormality. The medical community is divided wether it is a disease or malfunctioning because their bodies are more or less normal.

These folks have much higher heights in supermales (XYY). 7 feet is common.


I wonder if this will force some of those members to believe evolution. Why? I have no idea...
 
evolutionists say humans ancestors were some fish later they changed into some other living form then some ape like ancestors then from ape like ancestors apes and humans branched out. This shyt was never proven but it is shoved down our throats citing examples of microevolution (micro evo is a natural phenomenon and a reality)".
So students should be taught so that they would know what is the belief of western majority and the differences should be clarified, what is fiction and what is empirically proved.
Wat? You obviously dont know what evolution is
 
Darwin's theory of origin of species via natural selection gives an explanation of diversity of species. Why do you think it should lead to several genders?

Darwin tried to explain the variety of species with his hypothesis. There's a major difference between hypothesis and theory. A hypothesis is just like opinion without evidence. When a hypothesis is proven it becomes a theory. Darwin's idea is still a hypothesis and the science lovers on this forum are ignoring this critical fact.
 
Darwin tried to explain the variety of species with his hypothesis. There's a major difference between hypothesis and theory. A hypothesis is just like opinion without evidence. When a hypothesis is proven it becomes a theory. Darwin's idea is still a hypothesis and the science lovers on this forum are ignoring this critical fact.
Yes and evolution was proven and thus became a theory. Evolution is taught alongside the evidence for evolution from study of palaentology ,geographical distribution ,comparative anatomy ,comparative embryology ,comparative biochemistry etc. Biological classification system would be impossible without evolution and that is really strong evidence for evolution.
 
Yes and evolution was proven and thus became a theory. Evolution is taught alongside the evidence for evolution from study of palaentology ,geographical distribution ,comparative anatomy ,comparative embryology ,comparative biochemistry etc. Biological classification system would be impossible without evolution and that is really strong evidence for evolution.

Where are the fossils of the intermediary species? Why have they never been found after so many years of digging?
 
And probably the archeological institutes couldn't establish Darwins' hypothesis with those findings.
Darwin's "Hypthesis" was established long before. We never learned any "Hypothesis", it was called the "Theory of Evolution" and the knowledge of Heredity and Evolution have been vastly expanded since Evolution became a theory

Nope, there are no fossils of humans with 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1..........inch long tails. They would have found it by now if that was how monkeys had evolved into humans.
Monkeys did not evolve into Humans
 
And probably the archeological institutes couldn't establish Darwins' hypothesis with those findings.



Nope, there are no fossils of humans with 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1..........inch long tails. They would have found it by now if that was how monkeys had evolved into humans.

It's just simple. Is there many evidence to suggest that your height has grown 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 feet time to time or you have transitional evidence like photograph taken at some random times of your life.

BTW, Evolution is not a hypothesis. It has been proven for more than 150 years of scientific research. No one has yet come up to challenge the theory and the sheer number of evidence supporting it.

If you're talking evolution in the sense that man was derived from a single cell then that is wrong according to Quran. Every Muslim knows that Prophet Adam was created from Dust from every part of the earth mixed with water and Allah blew the soul into him so he could be alive.

But if you talk about human body changing over the course of time and then that is something different. Humans used to be massive compared to now. We've changed as a species but have never changed from one species to another.

Then how can you explain Neanderthals?
 
Darwin's theory of origin of species via natural selection gives an explanation of diversity of species. Why do you think it should lead to several genders?

"Because evolution can mean that the life forms we see today are different than the life forms that existed in the distant past. Darwin argued that unguided natural selection had the power to produce fundamentally new forms of life."

So if the creation of life is not by some intelligent designer, then the possibility of happening anything new is many. And then we should see more than two genders in Human race.

If unicellular bacteria can become multicellular animalia, then why not more than two genders?

upload_2017-6-24_9-31-44.png
 
Last edited:
And so? Why is this a major issue?
It's their internal problem, if Erdogan wants to make the country more islamic or not I don't see what's the issue there as far as Turks are happy with it, so what's the issue here?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom