Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For now, yes. But we're trying to plan ahead. Turkey has no choice but to increase the size of its sphere of influence. That's the only way to safeguard the security of our heartland. So in the near future it may become necessary to operate an aircraft carrier strike group in order to defend our global economic interests.building aircraft carrier would be the worts military decision Turkey ever had
For now, yes. But we're trying to plan ahead. Turkey has no choice but to increase the size of its sphere of influence. That's the only way to safeguard the security of our heartland. So in the near future it may become necessary to operate an aircraft carrier strike group in order to defend our global economic interests.
Can you tell us the distance between the plane and the radar in the second photo? Just say this?Earth curvature?
Can you tell us the distance between the plane and the radar in the second photo? Just say this?
technical question, french Charles de Gaulle length is almost same as TCG anadolu. they both have those jump ramps. f-16 with full internal fuel tank and 6 AMRAAMs has better T/W ratio (around 1) than french rafale. so the question is why you can't fly falcons from anadolu??
Moreover any conventional air plane cant land on LHD or LPD. The real problem is landing. If TCG Anadolu had catapult and Turkish Navy had f/A18 for carriers , aircrafts couldnt land on to LPD.Because their carrier uses a catapult system - not a ski jump. TCG Anadolu will probably never be used for fighters. It'll be a helicopter carrier with the possibility of carrying drones as well.
between the plane and the radar there is radar horizon like a mountain. Radars are standing at surface not at 10.000feet altitude.Can you tell us the distance between the plane and the radar in the second photo? Just say this?
my point is military expansions does not equate to economic benefits
It is the third time i wrote : you can not cover more than 60km at 30meter altitude.My friend is around the world 40.000km. Is Google Maps too amateur to calculate the west of Greece from Izmir, considering the round shape of the world? Didn't you see that the world is round in the big photo I gave? What percentage of 65000km you give? So what is the distance between the plane and radar in that way? That's all you got tired.
That depends on the target's flight altitude. If he's flying above the curvature of the Earth and therefore radar horizon than technically detection is only limited by weather clutter and the power/resolution of the radar.It is the third time i wrote : you can not cover more than 60km at 30meter altitude.
I never read what you wrote. I read now. range increases as altitude increases. I used Google trowel. Let me tell you how many kilometers of the west of Greece are from İzmir, I am waiting.It is the third time i wrote : you can not cover more than 60km at 30meter altitude.
What if greek air force flies at very low altitude as all fighters do in combat scenarios?I never read what you wrote. I read now. range increases as altitude increases. I used Google trowel. Let me tell you how many kilometers of the west of Greece are from İzmir, I am waiting.
then they work with low altitude radars. there is no single sensor on that ship. If they fly from low altitude, they become easy prey.What if greek air force flies at very low altitude as all fighters do in combat scenarios?