What's new

Turkey's support for the Kashmiris emphasized in Ankara

No, He is a Ahmedi Muslim, I have read it somewhere

So an Ahmadi cant be Kashmiri? What kind of messed up logic is that.

Do you know how many Kashmiri Ahmadis migrated from Kashmir during partition alone? Don't bring religion in to this, Kashmir is for all Kashmiris, regardless of religion.
 
. .
Whatever the case maybe, after the Simla Agreement; the Kashmir Issue is only between Pakistan and India. No Third Party involved.. which includes the UN.

Then both Pakistan and India are on the wrong. They have ignored the most important third party. Kashmiri themselves.
 
. . .
So an Ahmadi cant be Kashmiri? What kind of messed up logic is that.

Do you know how many Kashmiri Ahmadis migrated from Kashmir during partition alone? Don't bring religion in to this, Kashmir is for all Kashmiris, regardless of religion.

By suggesting 'Kashmir is for Kashimiris', I am going to assume you support the creation of countries all over the world based on ethnicity. By that logic, we'd be seeing KPK uniting with Afghanistan, Balochistan and Sindh becoming independant.

However, if you simply have this belief for Kashmir alone; then you're a hypocrite.
 
.
My claim is based on my heritage. What is the Indian claim based? A piece of paper signed by an usurper?



I am not even talking about the Kashmiris who fled during partition. It is obvious you are totally ignorant of the history of Kashmir. I am referring to incidents way before that.

How can I rationally discuss something with someone if they don't even have basic knowledge of what I am talking about.

At least bother to read what you have written and the part i have quoted.

Regarding some who fled before partition, Well how is India responsible for that? Kashmir was princely state.
 
.
At least bother to read what you have written and the part i have quoted.

Regarding some who fled before partition, Well how is India responsible for that? Kashmir was princely state.

They fled because of another occupation. The Indian is en extension of the old occupation. India is responsible for much more.
 
.
So an Ahmadi cant be Kashmiri? What kind of messed up logic is that.

Do you know how many Kashmiri Ahmadis migrated from Kashmir during partition alone? Don't bring religion in to this, Kashmir is for all Kashmiris, regardless of religion.

So what is your suggestion, that Kashmir be independent ?
 
.
By suggesting 'Kashmir is for Kashimiris', I am going to assume you support the creation of countries all over the world based on ethnicity. By that logic, we'd be seeing KPK uniting with Afghanistan, Balochistan and Sindh becoming independant.

However, if you simply have this belief for Kashmir alone; then you're a hypocrite.

I support the right of every people to self determination. So my logic accepts that if the people want it, they should get it.

Btw majority of Balouchis or Sindhis do not want independence from Pakistan. What else do you think the question of self determination is based on under the UN charter?
 
. . . . . .
Back
Top Bottom