Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
11 turkish UCAVS lost so far
11 turkish UCAVS lost so far
2 more turkish killed, 6 injured
can you please prove it?
11 Turkish UCAVs ? maybe in your dreams
after the Assad Regime attack on Turkish Forces in Idlib 27.02.2020
Turkish Armed Forces killed 3.322 Assad Regime militia and Iran backed terrorists
also Turkish Armed Forces destroyed
3 UAVs
2 SU-24 Fighter Jets
1 L-39 Aircraft
8 Helicopters
8 Air Defense Systems
155 Tanks
51 Howitzers
52 MLRS
29 AFVs
68 Military Vehicles
15 Anti Tank Weapons
36 Pick-up mounted anti aircraft guns
49 Ammunition Trucks
10 Ammunition Storage
2 Missile Systems
can you please prove it?
keep lying
Erdogan can claim 50000 but reality would not change.
SOHR which is an anti assad and overall anti Syrian agency is saying 1300 Syrian soldiers while 1400-1500 Turkish+SNA soldiers in total.
Can you prove 3000 Syrian soldiers ?
Can you prove 3000 Syrian soldiers ?
In addition Turkey lost;11 turkish UCAVS lost so far
2 more turkish killed, 6 injured
Well by what I see Russian AESA radars at least the export version have some short coming that their PESA radars seems not to have there was a report that Syrian tor were able to destroy its target in more than 80% of the time while pantsir were successful a lot less , something in line of 10% or around that .In system configuration, AESA structure is proven to be more resistant to electronic attacks because their module/phase shifter connection make them switch on their emitting frequencies much more frequently than a PESA can do so Not all jammer sensors with low output can blind an AESA easily so It is needed to apply different sector blinding technics for AESA. On the other hand, Quality of an AESA is not only about its structure but also its electronics, semi-conductors...etc
And You were one of the guys who called me sectarian for stating the truth.1400-1500 Turkish+SNA soldiers in total ? stupid loser shia terrorists keep dreaming
watch but dont cry , loser shia terrorists
I was under the impression that the current syrian army is mostly made of conscripts, and foreign mercs, all of whom wouldn't know how to use advanced weapons systems.
Feel free to correct me. I have no fight in this, I'm only here for the knowledge.
And You were one of the guys who called me sectarian for stating the truth.
Well by what I see Russian AESA radars at least the export version have some short coming that their PESA radars seems not to have there was a report that Syrian tor were able to destroy its target in more than 80% of the time while pantsir were successful a lot less , something in line of 10% or around that .
After all as you said we have AESA and AESA and it's seems those export version AESA radars are not something you can brag about.
they can always use different T/R modulesSome highlights for Idlib conflicts;
- Russia totally jammed GPS during operations but this couldn’t stop Turkey bombing Syrian assets
- Russian Krasukha land based electronic attack system couldn’t perform any serious effect on Turkish platforms. At least, we didn’t see any serious impact in operations such as cutting the connection of drones with ground bases or made Turkish Aircrafts blind while locking on Su-24 so Russia needed to transfer Tu-124R (correct me If The name of aircraft is not true) electronic attack aircraft to Syria.
- Turkish land based Koral electronic attack vehicle proved itself with powerful interference technics on Syria skies. This system blinded not only radars of Russian made Pantsir S-1 and Buk M2 systems but also challenged against Russian electronic counter-attack signals.
- Turkish drones proved themselves with mass coordinated network centric heavy strikes against an Army operating tanks, artillery, SAM’s and rockets. Within 7-8 days, Turkish drones destroyed %~15 of whole Syrian Army equipments. Russia is busy to transfer their reserve equipments to load on ships at present because Turkey broke the backbone of Asad army in North. We lost 3-4 drones in whole operations (visually proved)
Some tittles from famous news pages.
Erdogan-Armee zerstört Putins High-Tech-Waffen
https://www.bild.de/politik/ausland...rt-putins-high-tech-waffen-69192068.bild.html
Turkish Drones and Artillery Are Devastating Assad’s Forces In Idlib Province
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sebast...es-in-syria-and-downed-two-jets/#576e6f8e6cd3
En Syrie, la Turquie mène une guerre de drones
https://www.lopinion.fr/edition/international/en-syrie-turquie-mene-guerre-drones-213491
Turkish drones revolutionize Idlib conflict – analysis
https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Turkish-drones-revolutionize-Idlib-conflict-analysis-619510
I don't suppose Export versions have some kind of defficiency in terms of operational performance of radars. Export variants of such radars mostly come with software limitations. Software don't allow foreign operators to switch on longer range than original variant. I mean Manufacturer can not change the number of T/R modules, output powers, working angels, AESA structure cause of being export variant so It is just the softwares that won't allow foreigners to carry out duties on longer ranges. In this situation, Vulnerability of a costumer radar to electronic interference will be on same scale with originals.
the single F-16 crash happened due to pilot error, not due to skilled operators.Yes, SAA army is different from 2011.
But, other AA syst in Syria are operated by a dedicated team, since their delivery, I should also assume those pantsir to follow the same pattern.
Other AA syst in Syria, do work correctly, like what we seeing in the South of Syria. Where we can take the example of that Israeli F-16 crash after hit from Syria.
But S1 seems to be the "easy" target in Syria. Be it the ISraeli or Turks, the S1 seems to be "easy" to destroy even if it's ON.