If I could decipher the coherence in the response, I would respond aptly, so gather your thoughts and respond when you have something concrete.
As a matter of fact, I am quite calibrated at responding to garbage posts, but when coming from a moderator, I thought it was necessary. Pandering to straw incidences of trump worshippers is equivalent to me painting your majority as OBL cheerleader, such inferences from trolls on the forum is understandable, but when it comes to a moderator you dont think it should be pointed out?
As far as India and "do more", is concerned you might think that is cleverly veiled jab, I think it is in the poor transference of your own insecurities in dealing with US. We stood up to the same US when the 7th fleet was dispatched to obliterate us, we remain the same people today. Back then and today, our policy remains India first.
I do apologize if you think my response was in bad taste, but maybe next time you guys pick moderators, at least instruct them to post their messages with a semblance of grammar and devoid of the itch of religious baiting. how about that?
And that is fine, but if a moderator is baiting straw incidence to generalize a nationality, I am going to point it out. As far as foreign policy, Pakistan threw its a door open to US to it's own detriment across the cold war + 15 years, now it's doing the same vis-a-vis china.
When a moderator on this forum thinks, outright lying (common trump trait) = signal for India to "do more", how do you gauge that.
@Arsalan Now conduct and language like this is expected from trolls like these, I don't mind this at all, But when the moderators are baiting, thats when it becomes an issue.
@VCheng