What's new

Transit: The lose-lose game

first of all BD GDP is not 550 dollar, even if it were the size of the economy is 4 times bigger than the all of NE together. Maldives GDP/Capita is 3 times more than India's, keep that in mind.

BTW, regarding the link. I uderstand the knowledgebase for the list of GDPs of indian state but what is the purpose of it comparing that with some countries. What is that to prove. pathetic.
 
.
first of all BD GDP is not 550 dollar, even if it were the size of the economy is 4 times bigger than the all of NE together. Maldives GDP/Capita is 3 times more than India's, keep that in mind.

BTW, regarding the link. I uderstand the knowledgebase for the list of GDPs of indian state but what is the purpose of it comparing that with some countries. What is that to prove. pathetic.

Simple, the Article was claiming that BD would be doing a big favour on the North East. This is simply not the case
 
.
And I'm correct

List of Indian states by GDP - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Per capita incomes of 5 of the 7 sisters (in $)

Arunachal Pradesh :1,090

Sikkim : 1,033

Mizoram: 971

Meghalaya: 899

Tripura: 756


Per Capita income of Bangladesh: 550

Source: World Bank

BD 2010 GDP/capita is around 650 US dollars and not 550 dollars as mentioned.

BD's 100 billion dollar plus 2010 economy completely dwarfs the tiny economies of the NE Indian states anyway. The wealth of India is concentrated in states like Maharastra, Gujarat, and the southern states like Kerala and Tamil Nadu.
 
. .
BD 2010 GDP/capita is around 650 US dollars and not 550 dollars as mentioned.

BD's 100 billion dollar plus 2010 economy completely dwarfs the tiny economies of the NE Indian states anyway. The wealth of India is concentrated in states like Maharastra, Gujarat, and the southern states like Kerala and Tamil Nadu.

Its 811 dollar with 1995 base year. It will be more than 1200 dollar after the new base year takes effect.
 
.
Simple, the Article was claiming that BD would be doing a big favour on the North East. This is simply not the case

Dont you think a transit to outsideworld is a big favor, when you are vitually land locked? This will let NE to export their vast natural resources as well as bring huge investment to that region.
 
.
Its 811 dollar with 1995 base year. It will be more than 1200 dollar after the new base year takes effect.

BD close to graduating status from LDC to developing one

With its annual per capita income having reached $818, Bangladesh is now close to improving its standing from that of a least developed country to a developing one, officials and experts said Tuesday in Dhaka.

Under the criteria set by the UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development), the per capita income of a least developed country has to exceed $900 for inclusion as an economy on the road to graduation into a developing country, having a per capita income of over $1035.

Besides this, the criteria also include the status of human assets in terms of indicators relating to nutrition, health, education and adult literacy, extent of economic vulnerability, the degree of instability in relation to agricultural production and export earnings, relative importance of non-traditional economic activities, nature of export concentration and size of the economy.

Recently, the UNCTAD has also included the size of the population in the criteria for the least developed countries (LDCs), having set the limit of 75 million for the purpose.

The per capita income of Bangladesh in last fiscal 2009-10 was at $750 which, according to the latest available statistics of the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), rose to $818 in fiscal 2010-11, according to official sources.

The officials also said in recent years, Bangladesh has also scored successes in human resource development, health and education status of its population. Besides, its agricultural production has come into a stable position, and exports have recorded a marked surge though some major dependence on its narrow product base in merchandise sector still remains.

The Bangladesh economy is also growing significantly with provisional BBS figures indicating a 6.66 per cent growth of its gross domestic product (GDP) in fiscal 2010-11 against 6.07 per cent in fiscal 2009-10, the sources added.

The erstwhile least developed country, the Maldives has only recently graduated its status to that of a developing country stage, reducing the tally of the LDCs to 48.

Bangladesh is now almost at the top of the LDCs' ranking group, in terms of its relatively better performance - a reason for which its demand for better trade facilities is not equally shared by many other LDCs, the official sources noted.

They also observed that even some developing countries who are at the bottom of the related list have been opposing some of the demand of Bangladesh on the same ground.

Executive Director of Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD) -- a private sector think-tank -- Prof Mustafizur Rahman told the FE that the gross national income (GNI) of Bangladesh would indicate that the country stood among lower middle income group of countries.

"Our GNI is increasing, alongside rise in GDP. Our purchasing power is also rising. It is a good sign. But side by side, we have to concentrate on other indicators like exports, nutrition, health, education and climate change vulnerabilities," he noted.

Mr Rahman said: "Now we have to see how we can graduate ourselves to the status of a developing country."

Prof. Abu Ahmed of the University of Dhaka said Bangladesh had been doing much better than most other LDCs.

"Our average income is increasing significantly compared to the facilities that we do presently have," he said.

"Our economy could have grown at the rate of 7.5 per cent, had we no problem of gas and power supplies and other infrastructural deficit," Mr Ahmed observed.

link:

BD close to graduating status from LDC to developing one
 
.
Its 811 dollar with 1995 base year. It will be more than 1200 dollar after the new base year takes effect.

This is just one aspect... if you take in to consideration the shadow economy which is almost 45-82% of the total GDP which is 4-20% in case of majority of the developing and developed country ... per capita GDP will become way higher then the bhartis....

N the posters which are showing the per capita GDP of some states of NE india is higher then Bangladesh .... has no clue of what they are talking about... Majority of the NE indian depends of agriculture and the main source of income is exporting of natural resources which hardly benefit the ordinary NE Indians... most of them are dirt poor, unemployed and even many man and woman of NE india comes to Bangladesh searching for some livelihood. There is virtually no industry in NE India.

My room mates village is just adjacent to tripura border in comilla. He said that many girl from tripura comes to comilla to work as a maid as they even they do not have enough means to eat anything in tripura. Many others come here in dhaka to work as a cleaner to clean floor or toilet. I personally know 2 barber those who were from tripura in a nearby saloon of our apartment.

This is a recent night street view of Dhaka... let me show some heaven like places of NE India to describe their affluent and rich life:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Dont you think a transit to outsideworld is a big favor, when you are vitually land locked? This will let NE to export their vast natural resources as well as bring huge investment to that region.

NE is not landlocked as you would like to believe. By that token, Uttarakhand, Himachal and all are also landlocked. The transportation links are there and so it is not landlocked.

By transiting through Bangladesh, it will open up options.

It may so happen that at a later date, Indian goods may use Bangaldesh ports as the exit for Indian goods from the NE for foreign ports.

Therefore, Bangaldesh stand to gain in the short and the long run.

Hence, it is not a favour, big or small.

Bangaldesh will reap in the money for Transit charges.

India is linking up with Myanmar and that will boost the infrastructure of the NE as also Myanmar.

Myanmar is strategically a more important country to India than Bangladesh.
 
.
BD 2010 GDP/capita is around 650 US dollars and not 550 dollars as mentioned.

BD's 100 billion dollar plus 2010 economy completely dwarfs the tiny economies of the NE Indian states anyway. The wealth of India is concentrated in states like Maharastra, Gujarat, and the southern states like Kerala and Tamil Nadu.

Now, now, since you raised the issue of delusional, it surely takes a new meaning given your educated analysis!! :cheesy:
 
.
NE is not landlocked as you would like to believe. By that token, Uttarakhand, Himachal and all are also landlocked. The transportation links are there and so it is not landlocked.

By transiting through Bangladesh, it will open up options.

It may so happen that at a later date, Indian goods may use Bangaldesh ports as the exit for Indian goods from the NE for foreign ports.

Therefore, Bangaldesh stand to gain in the short and the long run.

Hence, it is not a favour, big or small.

Bangaldesh will reap in the money for Transit charges.

India is linking up with Myanmar and that will boost the infrastructure of the NE as also Myanmar.

Myanmar is strategically a more important country to India than Bangladesh.

Question was not whether BD gain or loose but whther NE will gain.. Why cant you ever think positively and always try to undermine every discussion.

There is a strong opposition from BD to grant India the access but talk to any NE guy whether they will oppose to avail it. The answer lies to this basic question, no need for brainstorming.

Sure Myanmar is strategically important and China will use it whatever way they want. India can only see a carrot which is just a tongue length away..
 
.
Its 811 dollar with 1995 base year. It will be more than 1200 dollar after the new base year takes effect.

Do you have a source for this?


The figure of 1200 seems impossibly large as BD has a government budget of around 22 billion dollars whereas Pakistan is at around 35 billion dollars. Either the BD economy is not that large or the government spends much less as a proportion of GDP than Pakistan.
 
.
Do you have a source for this?


The figure of 1200 seems impossibly large as BD has a government budget of around 22 billion dollars whereas Pakistan is at around 35 billion dollars. Either the BD economy is not that large or the government spends much less as a proprtion of GDP than Pakistan.

Govt spend much less here. Just look at the percentage of public spending in total investment which is only 5% out of 24% in BDs case.

For Pakistan its almost half of total spending.
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom