Top leaders of five countries to join Bangladesh’s 50 years celebrations

[magra]

that indian @magra is a bullshit merchant. if anything, Pakistan gained some territory from China. even wikipedia agrees.

Sino-Pakistan Agreement - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Wikipedia can never be used as an official credible source as anyone can modify it.
Even if I trust your wikipedia link, it clearly warns that the neutrality of the claim of territory gain is disputed.

I'm always astonished by how much Indians do randi rona about land we exchanged with China 50 years ago. We barely heard a peep when they lost land in Ladakh. It's like the lives of those brave virat Jawans who gave their lives getting beaten up like ragdolls by Chinese soldiers didn't matter...

We fought a war in 1962 and could not recover Aksai Chin. We never wilfully surrendered land like you. So much boast of a warrior race but meekly surrendered to Chinese.

 

[khansaheeb]

They are all your neighbours..Probably the best shot for making a long lasting economic union and free market zone

Tea boy economic corridor?

whole of indian sub continent except indus valley is going to join .

I wonder if they will get together and get pi$$ed afterwards?

 

[PakistaniAtBahrain]

Wikipedia can never be used as an official credible source as anyone can modify it.
Even if I trust your wikipedia link, it clearly warns that the neutrality of the claim of territory gain is disputed.

there are neutral sources that support Pakistan's position. so much so that even wikipedia says so even though there are an army of indians that can edit it to make up any lie.

the only ones that dispute the territory gain are indians and we couldnt a fu*k what they think.

 

[F-6 enthusiast]

there are neutral sources that support Pakistan's position. so much so that even wikipedia says so even though there are an army of indians that can edit it to make up any lie.

the only ones that dispute the territory gain are indians and we couldnt a fu*k what they think.

You gave them a glacier and they gave you a valley that has arable land and fit for habitation. This diffused tensions and more importantly provided you with a trump card against India. They know , they don't have any friends in their neighbourhood.

 

[HttpError]

Wikipedia can never be used as an official credible source as anyone can modify it.
Even if I trust your wikipedia link, it clearly warns that the neutrality of the claim of territory gain is disputed.

We fought a war in 1962 and could not recover Aksai Chin. We never wilfully surrendered land like you. So much boast of a warrior race but meekly surrendered to Chinese.

I mean, someone who lost 1,000 Sqm of their land to the Chinese just recently shouldn't be bragging about valor and courage.

China controls 1,000 sq. km of area in Ladakh

The official revealed that in Depsang Plains, from patrolling point 10-13, the scale of Chinese control of India’s perception of the LAC stood at about 900 sq.km.

www.thehindu.com

 

[magra]

there are neutral sources that support Pakistan's position. so much so that even wikipedia says so even though there are an army of indians that can edit it to make up any lie.

the only ones that dispute the territory gain are indians and we couldnt a fu*k what they think.

 

[Hiptullha]

We never wilfully surrendered land like you.

Land exchange = Land surrender now lol

So much boast of a warrior race but meekly surrendered to Chinese.

Very tough words from a pajeet whose country got invaded last year, had his brave young Jawans beaten up to death, a colonel thrown into a lake, hundreds of square kilometres of land taken, and his 56 inch Guru Yogi Swami Modi-Ji's only response was a TikTok ban. You're right though. Pajeets are definitely the true martial race here.

 

[magra]

I mean, someone who lost 1,000 Sqm of their land to the Chinese just recently shouldn't be bragging about valor and courage.

China controls 1,000 sq. km of area in Ladakh

The official revealed that in Depsang Plains, from patrolling point 10-13, the scale of Chinese control of India’s perception of the LAC stood at about 900 sq.km.

www.thehindu.com

1. This is a very dated article. After this, there has been disengagement where China has pulled back as well.
2. This talks about Chinese control on Indian perception of LAC. There is an Indian perception and a Chinese perception. In some areas, India controls lands on Chinese perception and vice versa.

Land exchange = Land surrender now lol

We all know you surrendered and submitted meekly to Chinese. No point sugar coating it as exchange to us.

Very tough words from a pajeet whose country got invaded last year, had his brave young Jawans beaten up to death, a colonel thrown into a lake

We beat them too. A number of their soldiers died. Ofcourse being a communication controlled regime, true figures will never come out from their side. And your country is not at liberty to take any narrative against Chinese version.

 

[PakistaniAtBahrain]

We all know you surrendered and submitted meekly to Chinese. No point sugar coating it as exchange to us.

ignore all the references that say it was an exchange. just keep sniffing that cow shit, stay high on that, and make up whatever crap you want.

 

[magra]

ignore all the references that say it was an exchange. just keep sniffing that cow shit, stay high on that, and make up whatever crap you want.

First give a credible neutral reference to make sense. Wikipedia is not one credible source.

 

[PakistaniAtBahrain]

First give a credible neutral reference to make sense.

will you believe it if i did?

 

[magra]

will you believe it if i did?

if you showed me a neutral and credible source (non-Pakistani non-Chinese), then I will comment based on that.

 

[PakistaniAtBahrain]

if you showed me a neutral and credible source (non-Pakistani non-Chinese), then I will comment based on that.

oh. so neutral source favouring Pakistan's assertions wont be enough for you to believe it?

 

[magra]

oh. so neutral source favouring Pakistan's assertions wont be enough for you to believe it?

first provide a neutral source if you have before blabbering needlessly.

 

[PakistaniAtBahrain]

first provide a neutral source if you have before blabbering needlessly.

first tell me if you will believe in it. i know you well. if the neutral source supports Pakistan view, then you will dismiss the sources.