1. Raids are conducted on the mission requirements. If need be the US can launch 100 Tomahawks at Tehran, what can Iran do? It will just rant and cry how great a satan the American country is. Iran is not hiding any high value target, if they did then America would act. You seriously need to read about CIA role in Iranian revolution and their acts of sabotage. It is no longer classified and in public domain.
Perhaps you still did not understand my post. Yes the US can conduct an aerial war on almost every country barring a couple and get away with it but it cannot wage a ground war on many of the same countries. And acts of sabotage, infiltration, spying etc., through ground assets based in that country are very different from sending in armed & active military personnel in uniform into that country.
2. What did you expect? That the US will openly admit he is a spy working for them. Or are you trying to tell me that Pakistan is so incompetent that they arrested and tried to prosecute a man with diplomatic immunity. In either case it is Pakistan who ends up looking like a fool.
Pakistan ends up being a fool because you lack the IQ to understand simple things, that's a new one for me.
Immunity was claimed by the US Government which was not accepted by GoP as apparently RD was neither travelling on diplomatic documents nor was his name shared with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of any diplomatic mission. And in any case, it had to be determined by the competent authority whether RD enjoyed diplomatic immunity or not, despite murdering 2 unarmed Pakistanis on the street of a Pakistani city in front of hundreds of Pakistanis. I believe the consensus on this side was the RD did not enjoy diplomatic immunity.
3. There is something called reality outside the world of conspiracy theories, try to explore it someday. If the OBL raid was a hoax then why did Pakistan arrest and prosecute a Pakistani doctor on charges of spying? Pakistan too loves Obama?
Actually, there is something outside the obsession with Pakistan, perhaps you should give it a try and in the process understand what reality really is.
And I had already posted a response to this question.
- You are tight for a change. US can do anything it wants with Pakistan.
Perhaps you meant to say 'right'? If that is indeed what you meant then you will gradually learn that I am usually 'right' when I say something. And the US can do anything it wants to do with Pakistan as long as it is willing to pay the 'right' price.
- If no raid took place and the whole thing is just a media hoax then why arrest an innocent Pakistani? According to you the whole raid is just a big fat media lie. And then again in the same sentence you claim ISI shared intel with CIA. So ISI is also playing a game of lies to help elect a US president?
Simple, as I had answered before, the man was working independently for the interests of the US Government in sharp disregard to the interests of Pakistan. When PakMil or ISI support CIA/USA then they probably have good reasons but when individuals do it, they are doing it for personal gains and fall under the purview of treason.
- Yes. America pays Pakistan in dollars for every citizen killed. It's a very brutal and tragic trade fair going on in Pakistan.
No it does not, it is a sort of a packaged deal
Answers for you.
- Why shouldn't the US kill him? They are not India to feed him biryani everyday like India did to kasab. Moreover there would have been a hostage crisis to free the messiah of millions of followers.
In the next line you post about inhuman terrorists, but is it fair killing a man without trial? And please do not tell me the NAVY seals were ill equipped or ill trained and could not take down an armed old man if they wanted to. And wouldn't the US have caught him alive to punish him themselves, like they did with Saddam Hussain, if he was actually still alive? Do you see a single benefit in killing him over trying and punishing him???
- Only inhuman terrorists parade the body of dead men as a war trophy, not civilised human beings. India did not parade the dead bodies of Pakistani soldiers killed in Kargil, they were given a proper burial. This is the difference between terrorists and us, we do not become terrorists when fighting them. We have the moral superiority.
So where did you so foolishly miss the line when speaking of the US by bringing in India?
There is a MASSIVE difference in parading a dead body and 'producing' a dead body to the cameras as proof. Today we are supposed to take the US on their word despite them having the so called chance to prove that they actually took out OBL in that raid.
4. You only said that drone strikes are necessary and those dying in collateral damage are no longer your people. You change your opinion pretty fast.
The least we can do is 'NOT' lie. If that is hard for you then there is no further point of this argument.
5. US has an economy of 14 Trillion dollars. They won't even feel the pinch if they go to war with Pakistan. On the other hand if aid money is stopped then Pakistan will cease to exist.
That is your opinion and it is just as factual and important as the opinion of any other Indian. Also, how much aid do you think Pakistan get from the US mate? I mean are you this retarded to believe that the US aid to Pakistan plays any major role in the actual budget of Pakistani people???
6. The US can dismantle Pakistan military within hours. Your navy is little better than a fishing company and your air force flies American aircraft. Saddam had 1 million men, 10,000 tanks and several thousand artillery guns during gulf war 1. It did not make any difference to USA.
Let us not waste our time on how the US can or cannot dismantle the Pakistan military within hours or minutes or days or weeks because, to begin with, it is all hypothetical and extremely biased and blinded opinion of an Indian. Also, I cannot be bothered explaining to you how the US was being supported by the whole world against an extremely poorly trained and ill equipped Iraqi military which had no will, reason or interest in fighting. Just as an example, the US could not even engage most of the scuds that Saddam launched......I mean scuds that could not cause 0.01% of a difference despite most of them hitting ground and exploding!! Saddam never had anything to confront the US Armoured divisions with, neither had he the firepower to be able to take out bases from where the air attacks occurred.
7. With what is Pakistan going to stop a US invasion? You cannot fight a poorly armed afghan unit of TTP who has invaded your country and you dream of defeating USA.
TTP recruits locals and going to war against locals, with bonds and tribal affinities that are held dear in expectancy of being able to bring the individual back to senses prevailing over other sentiments, is not easy. But uniting the country under 1 flag against invading forces, from any country, would have a devastating effect on the soldiers of that country especially if they do not have adjoining land where they could retreat to. Incidentally, the US has never won a single ground war outside of the US.
8. I admire your patriotism. But you are very cut off from reality. Your ground forces don't stand a chance against India. What will they fight against USA?
Honestly, I will ask you a simple question. Actually, do not even consider it a question, consider it food for your thought, something to ponder upon. If the Indian military is that mighty that they can run over Pakistani forces, what kept them at bay in 2001/02 when India had amassed 700,000-800,000 soldiers at our border, 60% of the IAF at forward bases and 80% of the artillery and armoured divisions at the front? Just think about it.
9. Your dismal record against TTP is for everyone to see. Even your own army has to seek prior permission from tribal sardars of pashtun lands before entering their territory.
Ignorance yet again. FATA does not fall under the constitution of Pakistan, it is federally administered by will of the local tribes as per their wishes. PakMil respects that and takes them on board before entering in for an operation. Besides, urban military campaigns cause considerable damage and the tribals need to be taken on board before that.
10. The "only Mujahideen" facade did not work in the diplomatic community who isolated Pakistan. You expected support from your allies on Kashmir but to your horror nobody not even China and Arab countries bothered to hear you. Why do you think Nawaz Sharif had to run to Washington?
NS was SUMMONED because India had raised the Nuclear rhetoric and was playing all its diplomatic card extremely efficiently. India did all that because it was unable to dislodge a mere 4k-5k fighters despite engagement with 35k Indian Army and 10+ squadrons of IAF!
Wars are fought for political gains. Only small countries with self-esteem issues decide to let their egos come in between and declare war. Why on earth would China sacrifice its economic growth to fight against USA, of all countries, for the sake of Pakistan? Use some common sense for God's sake. And even USA had urged India to show restraint during Kargil war and asked India to negotiate peace like many NATO countries did. China did not utter a SINGLE word. The day you stop being useful to them is the day they dump you in the cold.
First of all, let me be blunt, we do not depend on China for our security. For that we have enough resources at our disposal to ensure that if we go down, we take our enemy down with us. My post was in concern to China, would China accept the US waging a war on Pakistan, its only ally in Asia? I mean the US could not wage a war on ASSAD despite the world backing it and despite the fact that Syria is so far away from Russia. Did the US defend Ukraine militarily despite all its assurances? Did the Soviets stand their ground in Cuba? All these major powers have red zones that must not be crossed by any other power for balance. If I was thinking for China, I wouldn't want US bases in Afghanistan as well as Pakistan!
11. This has to be the heights of optimism. What makes you think China is willing to risk a nuclear war with US for Pakistan? China did not fire a single shot during Kargil war nor did they make any diplomatic noise. How much arms and ammo or diplomatic support is China giving you in your war against TTP? Is China even bothered about your zarb-e-azb?
I had to repeat a word many times, for you, in my mind but cannot write them here. How many times I have explained it previously but there you go again. What semblance of a threat did India pose to Pakistan during Kargil conflict that Pakistan would have had to look anywhere in the world????? Your military is impotent when Pakistan part 1 is not at war with Pakistan part 2 and that too divided by thousands of km's of Indian territory. You can only dream of defeating Pakistan ever since Bengalis took away their share.
You seem to have very grand delusions about international politics and "political friendship". There are no friends and enemies in politics. Ten years from now India and China could be staunch allies united against USA or India and USA can become official allies against China. It all depends on the situation and the benefits a country can derive. By using Pakistan the Chinese are able to fight a proxy war against India without risking Chinese lives. Your worth is only that much, you don't matter anything more to them.
There are many uncertainties in the world. The certain thing is that Pakistan will still be here despite all conspiracies and attempts. And that India will still never be able to attack Pakistan, that is outside of your dreams.
. F-35/Eurofighter etc, neither stands a chance against the Mig-21 Bison, right? I hope I am already making amends.
