TaiShang
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2014
- Messages
- 27,848
- Reaction score
- 70
- Country
- Location
Tianjin: How did this happen?
By Zhong Nan
At least 123 people were killed after a massive explosion ripped through a chemical storage facility in Tianjin port earlier this month. Now residents want to know went wrong.
Mystery still surrounds the massive chemical explosion at Tianjin port, which killed at least 123 people earlier this month.
At the center of the storm is Tianjin Dongjiang Port Rui Hai International Logistics Co, which stored toxic chemicals at the blast site.
Residents living close to the storage facility have described it as an "arsenal".
So, what actually happened? Below, are the key questions being asked about the deadly disaster:
How did Rui Hai International obtain a permit to store toxic chemicals?
For many residents, that is the key issue.
The company at the heart of the police investigation is Rui Hai International, which stored chemicals at the site without, it is claimed, the knowledge of local authorities.
With registered capital of 100 million yuan (US$15.7 million), Rui Hai International was set up in Dongjiang Free Trade Port Zone in 2012. The company's business facilities are made up of warehouses, storage terminals, storage yards, wastewater sumps and office buildings.
The company's website showed that it received a permit by Tianjin Maritime Safety Administration to operate storage and distribution works for toxic chemicals. These included calcium carbide, sodium nitrate and potassium nitrate.
Tianjin police has struggled to clearly identify the substances being stored at the blast site because the company's offices were destroyed. Confused documentation has also been a problem.
In another twist, Xinhua News Agency reported that Rui Hai International had only been granted a license to handle toxic chemicals less than two months ago.
This poses the question: Had the company been operating illegally since October 2014 after its temporary license had expired.
Did the company flout government regulations?
That is impossible to say at this stage as the investigation continues although there have been accusations.
Dong Shexuan, the deputy head of Rui Hai International, who holds 45 percent of the company's shares, is reported to be well connected with officers inside the Tianjin police force and fire service. Although details are sketchy, it has been alleged in The Beijing News that he met with officials of the Tianjin port fire brigade during a safety inspection.
According to claims from a senior official, who declined to be named, from the Industrial and Commercial Bureau of the Tianjin Binhai New Area, Dong gave fire service officers safety appraisal files, but an independent assessment of the site was not carried out. Dong, who is now in police custody, was unavailable to comment about these allegations.
What does appear clear is that Dong was given the green light for operating a storage facility close to a residential area. To many local residents, this appeared unusual as similar companies operating in the chemicals sector had been closed down by authorities.
So far, the police has detained senior managers of Rui Hai International, including Dong, as well as the son of a former police officer in Tianjin, and Yu Xuewei, a former State-owned company executive. Both are shareholders in Rui Hai International.
"Obtaining a safety risk assessment license should not be that easy," said Zhu Liming, deputy head of the planning and land management bureau at Binhai New Area.
"It should involve not only the local fire brigade but also safety experts who have the experience and expertise in this area. They are needed to identify all the potential safety risks and should be part of the evaluation team," Zhu added.
To illustrate the depth of the disaster, the municipal environmental authority reported that high levels of toxic fumes, including carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, were detected in the air up to 500 meters from the blast.
Why were the warehouses located so close to residential areas?
Again, this is a difficult question to answer. Yang Baojun, vice-president of the China Academy of Urban Planning and Design in Beijing, has called for the planning process to be overhauled.
"Because of economic development, the fast pace of urbanization and rising land prices in higher-tier cities, local governments need to pay greater attention to the distance separating residential areas from dangerous manufacturing and energy facilities," Yang said. "These should include chemical plants, power stations and paper mills."
Existing laws in China state that warehouses containing toxic materials must be at least 1,000 meters from major transport hubs and public buildings. But the Rui Hai International complex was only 560 meters away from a residential area and 630 meters from the railway station.
"It is impossible to improve production technology and storehouse methods over a night," Yang said. "But governments at different levels should be able to produce an urban plan that safeguards people's homes from potential harmful plants."
In Germany, industrial facilities, or warehouses, that use toxic or store chemicals, are built in isolated areas to protect the general public. The Berlin government also stipulates that these facilities have detailed safety and rescue plans in place. Plants are constantly monitored and regular safety checks are carried out.
How can disasters such as the Tianjin port explosion be averted in the future
Views on this subject are mixed. He Liming, chairman of the China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing, an industry body in Beijing, has pointed to the financial costs involved.
Moving chemical plants and warehouses outside of cities could prove difficult unless companies are heavily compensated
"As many chemical plants are located in the cities where land prices in China's urban areas have surged, they will not easily relocate unless they are paid the full value for the land they occupy," He said.
In addition, local governments rely on these companies to generate jobs, growth and taxes. In fact, they have become vital to domestic economies across the country.
Still, the Tianjin port explosion has to be a wake-up call for the entire nation, according to Zhang Boju, director of Friends of Nature in Beijing, a leading nonprofit organization involved in conservation protection.
Zhang would like to see all chemical-related industries reviewed and supervised by government and public watchdogs after calling for more transparency in the sector.
He pointed to public opposition surrounding the expansion of China National Petroleum Corp's refinery in Anning city, Southwest China's Yunnan province, in March.
Public concerns have been voiced regarding safety and environmental issues.
The plant refines 10 million metric tons of oil a year. It also produces paraxylene, which is used to purified terephthalic acid, a key component in the production of plastic bottles.
"As chemical plants are likely to raise fears among residents living in close proximity, the government must adopt a more active role in releasing well-timed information," Zhang said.
"The plants' owner should share information about development plans and issue environmental reports."
"To further prevent risks, the public should be allowed to take an active and constructive role in safety and environmental issues," he added.
After the Tianjin blast, the State Council issued an emergency notice in which it asked governments at all levels to reinforce the safety management on dangerous chemicals and explosives.
It called for strict controls and the implementation of special regulatory measures on highly toxic chemicals such as cyanide, as well as inflammable and explosive materials. The State Council urged governments at all levels to learn the bitter lessons from the massive blast and to crack down on illegal activities to ensure the safety of the general public.
By Zhong Nan
At least 123 people were killed after a massive explosion ripped through a chemical storage facility in Tianjin port earlier this month. Now residents want to know went wrong.
Mystery still surrounds the massive chemical explosion at Tianjin port, which killed at least 123 people earlier this month.
At the center of the storm is Tianjin Dongjiang Port Rui Hai International Logistics Co, which stored toxic chemicals at the blast site.
Residents living close to the storage facility have described it as an "arsenal".
So, what actually happened? Below, are the key questions being asked about the deadly disaster:
How did Rui Hai International obtain a permit to store toxic chemicals?
For many residents, that is the key issue.
The company at the heart of the police investigation is Rui Hai International, which stored chemicals at the site without, it is claimed, the knowledge of local authorities.
With registered capital of 100 million yuan (US$15.7 million), Rui Hai International was set up in Dongjiang Free Trade Port Zone in 2012. The company's business facilities are made up of warehouses, storage terminals, storage yards, wastewater sumps and office buildings.
The company's website showed that it received a permit by Tianjin Maritime Safety Administration to operate storage and distribution works for toxic chemicals. These included calcium carbide, sodium nitrate and potassium nitrate.
Tianjin police has struggled to clearly identify the substances being stored at the blast site because the company's offices were destroyed. Confused documentation has also been a problem.
In another twist, Xinhua News Agency reported that Rui Hai International had only been granted a license to handle toxic chemicals less than two months ago.
This poses the question: Had the company been operating illegally since October 2014 after its temporary license had expired.
Did the company flout government regulations?
That is impossible to say at this stage as the investigation continues although there have been accusations.
Dong Shexuan, the deputy head of Rui Hai International, who holds 45 percent of the company's shares, is reported to be well connected with officers inside the Tianjin police force and fire service. Although details are sketchy, it has been alleged in The Beijing News that he met with officials of the Tianjin port fire brigade during a safety inspection.
According to claims from a senior official, who declined to be named, from the Industrial and Commercial Bureau of the Tianjin Binhai New Area, Dong gave fire service officers safety appraisal files, but an independent assessment of the site was not carried out. Dong, who is now in police custody, was unavailable to comment about these allegations.
What does appear clear is that Dong was given the green light for operating a storage facility close to a residential area. To many local residents, this appeared unusual as similar companies operating in the chemicals sector had been closed down by authorities.
So far, the police has detained senior managers of Rui Hai International, including Dong, as well as the son of a former police officer in Tianjin, and Yu Xuewei, a former State-owned company executive. Both are shareholders in Rui Hai International.
"Obtaining a safety risk assessment license should not be that easy," said Zhu Liming, deputy head of the planning and land management bureau at Binhai New Area.
"It should involve not only the local fire brigade but also safety experts who have the experience and expertise in this area. They are needed to identify all the potential safety risks and should be part of the evaluation team," Zhu added.
To illustrate the depth of the disaster, the municipal environmental authority reported that high levels of toxic fumes, including carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, were detected in the air up to 500 meters from the blast.
Why were the warehouses located so close to residential areas?
Again, this is a difficult question to answer. Yang Baojun, vice-president of the China Academy of Urban Planning and Design in Beijing, has called for the planning process to be overhauled.
"Because of economic development, the fast pace of urbanization and rising land prices in higher-tier cities, local governments need to pay greater attention to the distance separating residential areas from dangerous manufacturing and energy facilities," Yang said. "These should include chemical plants, power stations and paper mills."
Existing laws in China state that warehouses containing toxic materials must be at least 1,000 meters from major transport hubs and public buildings. But the Rui Hai International complex was only 560 meters away from a residential area and 630 meters from the railway station.
"It is impossible to improve production technology and storehouse methods over a night," Yang said. "But governments at different levels should be able to produce an urban plan that safeguards people's homes from potential harmful plants."
In Germany, industrial facilities, or warehouses, that use toxic or store chemicals, are built in isolated areas to protect the general public. The Berlin government also stipulates that these facilities have detailed safety and rescue plans in place. Plants are constantly monitored and regular safety checks are carried out.
How can disasters such as the Tianjin port explosion be averted in the future
Views on this subject are mixed. He Liming, chairman of the China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing, an industry body in Beijing, has pointed to the financial costs involved.
Moving chemical plants and warehouses outside of cities could prove difficult unless companies are heavily compensated
"As many chemical plants are located in the cities where land prices in China's urban areas have surged, they will not easily relocate unless they are paid the full value for the land they occupy," He said.
In addition, local governments rely on these companies to generate jobs, growth and taxes. In fact, they have become vital to domestic economies across the country.
Still, the Tianjin port explosion has to be a wake-up call for the entire nation, according to Zhang Boju, director of Friends of Nature in Beijing, a leading nonprofit organization involved in conservation protection.
Zhang would like to see all chemical-related industries reviewed and supervised by government and public watchdogs after calling for more transparency in the sector.
He pointed to public opposition surrounding the expansion of China National Petroleum Corp's refinery in Anning city, Southwest China's Yunnan province, in March.
Public concerns have been voiced regarding safety and environmental issues.
The plant refines 10 million metric tons of oil a year. It also produces paraxylene, which is used to purified terephthalic acid, a key component in the production of plastic bottles.
"As chemical plants are likely to raise fears among residents living in close proximity, the government must adopt a more active role in releasing well-timed information," Zhang said.
"The plants' owner should share information about development plans and issue environmental reports."
"To further prevent risks, the public should be allowed to take an active and constructive role in safety and environmental issues," he added.
After the Tianjin blast, the State Council issued an emergency notice in which it asked governments at all levels to reinforce the safety management on dangerous chemicals and explosives.
It called for strict controls and the implementation of special regulatory measures on highly toxic chemicals such as cyanide, as well as inflammable and explosive materials. The State Council urged governments at all levels to learn the bitter lessons from the massive blast and to crack down on illegal activities to ensure the safety of the general public.
