Joe Shearer
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,493
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
Kambojas were an Iranic people that settled in Arachosia, a loosely defined region that most likely extended from Arghandabad river in Afghanistan to the Indus river in Pakistan. There were many tribes of the Kambojas that were recorded and detailed by the Greeks.
They began to trickle into Punjab, but we do not know exactly when. My personal theory is that it had to do with Alexander's invasion.
The Kambojas fiercely resisted Alexander in modern-day KPK and at many times fought to the last man and woman (who fought as well). After severe losses, many Kambojas destroyed their own cities and fled (most likely into Punjab); possibly as a scorched-earth tactic.
Some clans migrated as deep into Bengal, Nepal and Tibet and because of their military prowess, dominated the locals, setting up powerful dynasties, the most famous of which is the Kamboja-Pala dynasty of Bengal.
It is recorded in Mauryan edicts that the Kambojas enjoyed autonomy and that Ashoka had sent missionaries to convert them to Buddhism, a religion that most likely became dominant among the Kambojas before the arrival of Islam.
"Indian Kambojas" mostly 'dispute' links with the ancient Kambojas and claim themselves to be Rajputs instead. This can actually have great truth to it as the Kambojas rose to great prominence under the Mughals and many Rajputs and other tribes serving under Kamboh nobles most likely began to refer to themselves as Kambojas, similar to how Rajput clans assimilated into the Gujjars.
I am familiar with some parts of your very interesting note, except that in protohistory, the Parama Kamboja were further north, probably somewhere on the other side of the Hindu Kush; given the description of their horsemanship and their proximity to the Bahlika, the people from Balkh, Bactria, and that they were Aryan-speakers who had 'fallen away' and spoke strangely (meaning from the standard of Indo-Aryan that was spoken in what the priests defined as the correct style), I should have imagined that they were closer to what is today Tajikistan.
I am inclined to think that their horsemanship, and their horses, in fact, were those that the other independent authority on Indian protohistory, the Chinese explorer, Zhang Qian, noticed and described as the 'bleeding horses' (a description often given even later to Ferghana horses). Ferghana, of course, lies within the present-day Tajikistan.
Ferghana is in the top right hand corner, across the Pamirs, while Gandhara, with which many Pakistanis feel they can identify, is in the bottom right hand corner.
However, these are my personal meanderings; what I have written relates to the Parama Kamboja, not the Kamboja proper. The Kamboja are mentioned in Asokan pillars (@Kambojaric must have come across this), and are thought to have been on the left bank of the Kabul river; quite probable, considering the position of their cousins, the Parama Kamboja, and therefore their proximity to the Gandhara, the mother's brother for the Kaurava crown prince, Duryodhana, born to Gandhari, one reason why they fought for him rather than for the Pandavas)
Just to remind ourselves, the next geographical information that we have about this part of the world is the imperial province list, the relevant ones from Khorasan and trans-Indus India being:
- Sattagydians, Gandharans, Dadicae, Aparytai;//Border marches; Sattagydia (sata godham, hundred cows, sometimes - in the sense of many - thousand cows; today, Sindh; Gandhara the Kabul region; Dadicae, the Dadi, rulers of the country that is now under the Kakars (although the Cambridge History thinks that they are the Dards; Aparytai, thought by some to refer to the Afridi. This is still pure speculation.
- Caspians, Pausicae, Pantimathi, Daricae; //Do not belong to our discussion;
- Bactrians and all neighbouring people as far as the Aegli;//Probably the common ancestors of the Tajik and of the Pushto;
- Sacae, and the Caspians;//The Scythians, mainly
- Parthians, Chorasmians, Sogdians and Arians;//The Parthians being irrelevant - too far west - and the Chorasmians (Khwarezmians) too; however, Middle Persian for Parthian was Pahlava, reminiscent of the companions of the Sakas when they swept into Arachosia and following which that province came to be known as Sakasthan - today, Seisthan;
I also read somewhere a very detailed report of how the Kambojas came into conflict with other tribes over the salt plains of Punjab and how they also colonised many areas in Sindh during the pre-Mughal era, but I cannot seem to find it anymore. Will post it once I find it.
The first is VERY PROBABLE, the next, is a possibility, but needs to be inspected with caution.
They are considered, by some sources, to have been located on the left bank of the Kabul River as it debouched into the Indus, and so in an ideal position to have been making miserable people around the Salt Range.