What's new

The myth of ‘Hindutva terror’

Hindu terror is not a myth its as real as the universal truth of sun rises in the east.
 
Tshering, you can agree to disagree.

I probably know more Muslims than you do, having grown up amongst them in Bihar.

My posts represent my views.

What is "holistic"?

Are we supposed to be random sample snap polls to be taken seriously?
 
Hindu terror is not a myth its as real as the universal truth of sun rises in the east.


Huh? Who said it did? Any proof? Citations, references, that kind of thing? Or are we supposed to swallow what is probably an ISPR propaganda story hook, line and sinker?
 
Huh? Who said it did? Any proof? Citations, references, that kind of thing? Or are we supposed to swallow what is probably an ISPR propaganda story hook, line and sinker?

dada u ll find terrorists in every religion. fundamentalists r always dangerous
 
it is just that ! my simple question is "when i am with my christian or sikh or hindu friend, i don't care what i say ! but why when i talk to a good muslim friend of mine , i have to contemplate everything i say (just feels like i am walking on slippery surface) . and always afraid that i might hurt him if i say something wrong ! why i can't be normally free with him ?"

may be because you dont wanna end up hurting his religious sentiment as you know they are very sensitive with their religion. and secondly since you are a hindu (majority) you dont wanna say something that hurts him.
 
may be because you dont wanna end up hurting his religious sentiment as you know they are very sensitive with their religion. and secondly since you are a hindu (majority) you dont wanna say something that hurts him.

As a people we are politically correct in matters of faith.

Some days ago Asim was talking about how Pakistanis talk in their personal circles about Hindu rituals, etc.

We just simply do not go there.

Because we live together.

That said, I have never had a problem discussing social or communal issues bordering or derived from religion with any of my friends.

Be it Muslim and Ayodhya/Mumbai or Godhra.

Or Sikh and Golden Temple and Delhi.

Or Christian and their need to proselytize always.

Or Hindu (Marathi mainly) and their regionalism.

Or Parsi and our narrow mindedness when it comes to inter-marrying and racial purity (though I am staunchly racialist myself).
 
Huh? Who said it did? Any proof? Citations, references, that kind of thing? Or are we supposed to swallow what is probably an ISPR propaganda story hook, line and sinker?
Nah you dont need ISPR propaganda story for that,Sire.GOI and indian MSM did better job on popularizing the term saffron terror.Now either GOI+MSM is lying through their teeth or saffron terror does exists. Keeping in mind GoI and MSM are representative of Indian society that means either you are blaming Indians of lying about the existence of saffron terror or trying to shift blame on ISPR propaganda machinery.
 
Nah you dont need ISPR propaganda story for that,Sire.GOI and indian MSM did better job on popularizing the term saffron terror.Now either GOI+MSM is lying through their teeth or saffron terror does exists. Keeping in mind GoI and MSM are representative of Indian society that means either you are blaming Indians of lying about the existence of saffron terror or trying to shift blame on ISPR propaganda machinery just by being clever by half,Sire.

<sigh>

Oh well, now that I'm caught at it. No wonder I can't get anything done, being clever by half. If only I was like all those people who keep popping up, too clever by half.
 
1.At Partition it was generally believed that the Muslim part would be Pakistan, and the Hindu part Hindustan. However, Machiavellian Indian politicians usurped the British colonial name and the geographical identity of SA. India then moved on a seemingly secular path of politics although secularism was incorporated as a state principle only in 1976. This concept of secularism is championed by politicians for vote purpose and the bulk of western educated urban elite. The bulk of the rural Indians do not understand or want to accept this. In short secularism in India is a farce / hypocrisy.

2. Much of India's and SA's tension and suspicion would end if India officially names herself Hindustan, a land of Hindus. And adopted Hinduism as the state religion allowing full religious freedom to all others.
 
1.At Partition it was generally believed that the Muslim part would be Pakistan, and the Hindu part Hindustan. However, Machiavellian Indian politicians usurped the British colonial name and the geographical identity of SA. India then moved on a seemingly secular path of politics although secularism was incorporated as a state principle only in 1976. This concept of secularism is championed by politicians for vote purpose and the bulk of western educated urban elite. The bulk of the rural Indians do not understand or want to accept this. In short secularism in India is a farce / hypocrisy.

2. Much of India's and SA's tension and suspicion would end if India officially names herself Hindustan, a land of Hindus. And adopted Hinduism as the state religion allowing full religious freedom to all others.

What a chaman man.
 
For other uses, see Sire (disambiguation).
Sire is a form of address for reigning kings in the United Kingdom and in Belgium. It was formerly also used in France, Italy, Germany, Sweden and Spain. Historically Sire had a wider usage. During the middle ages Sire was generally used to address a superior, a person of importance or in a position of authority or the nobility in general. The word "sire" and the French "(mon)sieur" share a common etymologic origin, both ultimately being related to the Latin senior.

However, to be quite fair

sire *(sr)
n.
1. A father.
2. The male parent of an animal, especially a domesticated mammal such as a horse.
3. Archaic A male ancestor; a forefather.
4. Archaic A gentleman of rank.
5. Archaic Used as a form of address for a superior, especially a king.
tr.v. sired, sir·ing, sires
To father; beget.
[Middle English, from Old French, from Vulgar Latin *seior, from Latin senior, older, comparative of senex, old; see sen- in Indo-European roots.]
 
Joe are you done trolling?

What about responding to my well thought out reply to your request?

i.e. way forward for the Parivar.
 
Back
Top Bottom