What's new

The last time China got into a fight with Vietnam,it was a Disaster

do your govt at that time mean southeast asia is your territory?

Nah, but Vietnam did get into the idea that since USSR was their ally, they can start raiding Chinese borders, something that even the Americans didn't dare to do during the Vietnam war. China, of course, demanded a fair price for that, Vietnam's future as a region power will suffice.
 
Nah, but Vietnam did get into the idea that since USSR was their ally, they can start raiding Chinese borders, something that even the Americans didn't dare to do during the Vietnam war.

China itself did what you call raiding borders of Vietnam from China and Cambodia.
Vietnam response is after provocative acts from China and China backed forces.
You have any record about that idea?
An Russian, Indian also laugh at your argument, because they know well about your lie after conflict in 1969, 1962
No one attacking you. but that you who invaded others
 
Last edited:
Gosh! So the whole drama in the Chinese waters was a masterful long-term strategy of the Vietnamese to give an end to the illegal workers in Vietnam?
.
That drama to prove that we r NOT China friend, US-EU can trust VN in containing China, and EU-US will support VN more, transfer more high-tech to VN and help VN to get Rich :pop:
Your government is incapable of containing mobs. Otherwise, we know, your government would be the last to see such self-looting and murder happening. Because, pragmatically:

1. It weakens your own economic basis

2. Takes away some of the aurora of a victim played by the Vietnamese. One cannot be at once a murderer and a victim.
The mob only kill illegal Chinese workers. Our Police did stop them maybe the police dont like Chinese too

So from now, we dont have to see illegal Chinese workers any more coz our people still so angry with those Chinese.
 
I think this conflict is being controlled by a third party
Yeah, rumor in VN said that, too. Its so easy for our police with full of weapon and tear gas to took down the mob...but they just stand and watch until some Chinese got killed
 
Yeah, rumor in VN said that, too. Its so easy for our police with full of weapon and tear gas to took down the mob...but they just stand and watch until some Chinese got killed
Ur local police S@CK ! VCP even lost controlls to police.
 
There is no love lost between China and Vietnam, Vietnam will destroy China if they have a chance. Currently Vietnam in no serious threat to China survival, why China not start a short but maximum destruction war with Vietnam? Serve 2 purpose, destroy Vietnam economy and let the world know China won't hesitate to fight a war and protect your interest?
Provocation US wants! :D but i personally agree with you 8-)
 
I think this conflict is being controlled by a third party

No, this conflict caused by China, not to confront on Vietnam only but throw a stone of path finding ...
in my opinion, this is a bad move on strategy, ... until now, no country officially on China side.

Yeah, rumor in VN said that, too. Its so easy for our police with full of weapon and tear gas to took down the mob...but they just stand and watch until some Chinese got killed

You lied for fun, huh ? NiceGuy ( Bad Guy indeed ).
 
Nah, but Vietnam did get into the idea that since USSR was their ally, they can start raiding Chinese borders, something that even the Americans didn't dare to do during the Vietnam war. China, of course, demanded a fair price for that, Vietnam's future as a region power will suffice.

You sure that you are not brainwashed ?

Vietnam never plan to invade China land.
How you explain, before the attacks of Vietnam troops to Khmer Rouge., how you explain for :
1. Military airbases in Cambodia built by Chinese for giant bombers, while Cambodia not has that type ? they nearly finished at the end of 1978 ...
2. The road to the border Vietnam-Cambodia in Cambodia land, built by Chinese fund,
3. China plan of mobilization to China Vietnam borders in 4th quarter of 1978 .. ?
4. Several raids of Khmer Rouge to Vietnam civilization, see Ba Chuc massacre by Khmer Rouge to Vietnamese in Vietnam land
----------
Answer those question first then knowing that Vietnam actually attack Khmer Rouge after all.
What Khmer Rouge and Chinese military advisors did to Cambodia - massacre only ?
What Vietnam did to Cambodia, .. building and saving the government which nowaday controlling Cambodia
 
May 15,2014
The Last Time China Got Into a Fight With Vietnam,it was a Disaster

ap643612572919.jpg

Vietnamese protest against China’s deployment of an oil rig in the disputed South China Sea in front of the Chinese Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam on Saturday, 10 May 2014.Associated Press

Current Sino-Vietnamese tensions are merely the latest in a series of bitter conflicts between the two countries. The last time Hanoi and Beijing pushed each other to the brink, tens of thousands perished

Smoldering nationalist anger in Vietnam exploded into frenzied violence in the suburbs of Ho Chi Minh City this week as thousands of rioters swept through industrial parks north of the city’s commercial hub, razing any factory believed to be Chinese owned. After more than two decades of peace, Beijing and Hanoi are at odds again.

China’s decision earlier this month to deploy a colossal, state-owned oil rig in fiercely contested waters off the Vietnamese coast appears to have succeeded in derailing the delicate relations between the countries.

The Chinese state press lashed out publicly at its southern neighbor on the heels of several maritime skirmishes last week, with one hawkish editorial calling on Beijing to teach Vietnam the “lesson it deserves.” The language closely resembled Chinese Premier Deng Xiaoping’s 1978 vow to teach Hanoi a “lesson” — and the echo is most unfortunate, because on that occasion the result was tens of thousands of deaths.

Like many Vietnamese of her generation, 75-year-old Dim remembers the conflict well. During the early hours of February 17, 1979, she was asleep with her husband and children in their stone cottage in farmlands outside the northern city of Cao Bang, when the sky opened up with artillery shells.

“We didn’t have time to grab anything,” says Dim. “I just ran.”

It was the beginning of two years of homelessness and hunger as the starving family wandered through the mountains, begging and looking for refuge. Although decades have passed since the war’s end, she still shudders with loathing of the Chinese.

“Oh! I still hate them,” says Dim. “I’m still scared of the Chinese people, even now. I don’t know when I’ll next have to run.”

Official memories in Vietnam, however, are far more selective. While the country proudly celebrates its victorious wars against French and American forces, Hanoi remains largely quiet about the about the Sino-Vietnamese War. (China’s official stance is even more muted.) But that hasn’t kept the Vietnamese people from simmering with animosity toward their historic foe.

In the years following the U.S. withdrawal from Indochina, relations among the socialist nations of Southeast Asia violently deteriorated. Pogroms conducted against Vietnam’s ethnic Chinese community, and the overthrow by Vietnamese forces of Pol Pot — Beijing’s ally — set the stage for a showdown, as did Vietnam’s alliance with China’s great rival, the Soviet Union.

In the winter of 1978, when Deng Xiaoping made his threat of a “lesson,” more than 80,000 Chinese troops were sent across the border into Vietnam. Chinese Deputy Defense Minister Su Yu boasted of being able to take Hanoi in a week, but the untested and under-equipped People’s Liberation Army (PLA) met fierce resistance from battle hardened Vietnamese forces deployed across the frontier’s limestone karsts. The Chinese were slaughtered by local militia from positions that had been utilized for centuries against invaders from the north.

“More Chinese soldiers were getting killed because they were fighting like it was the old times,” says Vietnamese veteran Nguyen Huu Hung, who witnessed the PLA’s human waves being mown down near the city of Lang Son. “They were in lines and just keep moving ahead … they didn’t run away.”

It would take just six weeks for Beijing to call off its “self-defensive counteroffensive.” Teaching the Vietnamese a lesson turned out to be a costly affair. Official casualty statistics have never been released by either Beijing or Hanoi; however, analysts have estimate that as many as 50,000 soldiers died during the confrontation.

“I heard that [China] said they wanted to teach Vietnam a lesson, but I can’t see what the lesson was,” says Hung. “Our job was to fight against them. But the losses, to be honest, were huge.”

When the Chinese began their pullout in early March, the retreating troops implemented a barbaric scorched-earth policy. Every standing structure in their path was destroyed. Any livestock they encountered were killed. Bitterness was sown.

Much like Dim, 59-year-old Nhung fears that someday the Chinese may return. Illiterate and impoverished, the ethnic Tay native remembers how Chinese troops gathered all the food stocks from surrounding villages and set their provisions ablaze. “It didn’t stop burning for ten days,” she says.

After the invasion commenced, Nhung took shelter in musty limestone caverns that housed the surviving members of 14 local villages just a few miles south of the Chinese border. From time to time they would sneak out to forage for food.

“If they saw someone on the road, [the Chinese] would fire at them,” says Nhung, who now sells roasted sweet potatoes and bottles of tea to the occasional tourists who visit the caves she once cowered in.

By 1991, Vietnam was five years into its nascent economic reforms and in desperate need of friends. The Soviet Union was falling apart and the Americans were still holding firm to their embargo against the country, but China was rising. Hanoi repaired ties with Beijing, and for the past two decades the country’s ruling Communist Parties have largely remained as “close as lips as teeth,” as the old socialist slogan goes.

“They face similar challenges,” Tim Huxley, executive director of the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ Asia office, tells TIME. “I think there’s quite considerable empathy between them in that they’re both trying to manage a transition to economic and social modernity.”

However, one irritant in the relationship continues to fester — Beijing’s ambitious claim over a lion’s share of the South China Sea. With an estimated 24.7 trillion cubic feet of proven natural gas and 4.4 billion barrels of oil waiting to be tapped, Vietnam’s economic future is dependent on having access to its share of those waters.

“What’s the party got? It’s not popular vote. It’s not the charismatic leadership of Ho Chi Minh,” says Carlyle A. Thayer, Emeritus Professor at The University of New South Wales and Vietnam specialist. “It has the vestiges of nationalism and standing up to foreign aggressors and it has economic growth.”

Sporadic protests against China have been increasingly common in the country in recent years, and when the government’s response to Chinese aggrandisement is viewed as weak, a new crop of rebel netizens harasses the party online for kowtowing to Beijing.

“If [the leadership is] shown to actually be compromising on national sovereignty for the sake of ideological solidarity with China that is a very, very grave criticism of the party,” says Nayan Chanda, editor-in-chief of YaleGlobal online magazine.

In 2013, the Vietnamese government arrested more than 40 bloggers and activists for making such criticisms, among other things. Over 30 are still behind bars, according to Reporters Without Borders.

But following last week’s clashes over the oil rig, the Vietnamese government has taken a decidedly harder line with Beijing. During the ASEAN Summit in Burma, Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung blasted the Chinese for “slandering” Vietnam and escalating tensions in the region.

“National territory is sacred,” the prime minister told fellow heads of state. “Vietnam vehemently denounces acts of infringement and will resolutely protect our national sovereignty and legitimate interests in conformity with the international law.”

Large officially sanctioned demonstrations have also been allowed across the country and the state press has, for the first time in recent memory, followed the unrest closely. On social media, users are decrying Chinese arrogance and some are calling for Chinese blood.

Veterans like Hung, however, show a little bit more caution. He knows only too well what happens when both sides push each other to the brink.

“I don’t think the rest of the society, especially young people, know enough about [that war],” says Hung.

But even Hung, who now has business in southern China, and who admits that that politics hardly interests him, says he would pick up arms without hesitation if the Chinese ever came knocking again.

“Of course,” he says with a steady voice. “Because I’m Vietnamese.”

South China Sea: The Last Time China and Vietnam Fought, It Was Hell - TIME

Selective posting... Last time China and Vietnam fought is 1988 Johnson south reef skirmish.

With video as proof. It was hell of a loss for vietnam. :lol:


Johnson South Reef Skirmish - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
You sure that you are not brainwashed ?

Vietnam never plan to invade China land.
How you explain, before the attacks of Vietnam troops to Khmer Rouge., how you explain for :
1. Military airbases in Cambodia built by Chinese for giant bombers, while Cambodia not has that type ? they nearly finished at the end of 1978 ...
2. The road to the border Vietnam-Cambodia in Cambodia land, built by Chinese fund,
3. China plan of mobilization to China Vietnam borders in 4th quarter of 1978 .. ?
4. Several raids of Khmer Rouge to Vietnam civilization, see Ba Chuc massacre by Khmer Rouge to Vietnamese in Vietnam land
----------
Answer those question first then knowing that Vietnam actually attack Khmer Rouge after all.
What Khmer Rouge and Chinese military advisors did to Cambodia - massacre only ?
What Vietnam did to Cambodia, .. building and saving the government which nowaday controlling Cambodia

1. Well, incursion into Chinese border such as Malipo (老山) in Yunnan province as well as Chinese held island counts definitely counts incursions. Your troop is on our land, what you planned is irrelevant.
2. China builds roads and airports in a lot of places. Lots of them are used to support YOU in your war with US.
3. Of course we mobilized, Vietnam incursions started way before 78, 79 is just the time that we gathered enough force to begin the actual retaliation.
4. Whatever Khmer Rouge do is completely irrelevant to us, we don't control that country and we certainly don't influence their decision making.

China itself did what you call raiding borders of Vietnam from China and Cambodia.
Vietnam response is after provocative acts from China and China backed forces.
You have any record about that idea?
An Russian, Indian also laugh at your argument, because they know well about your lie after conflict in 1969, 1962
No one attacking you. but that you who invaded others

Right...because whatever Cambodia did, it justified Vietnam on incurring into Chinese lands. This is equivalent of saying Iraq going to attack and occupy US lands because something Iranians did. (Iran was an US ally back then). Not only is this illogical, it is also plain stupid as history showed China's response to that.
 
Since 1979, Chinese military has revolutionized itself through modernization and downsizing. I do think that Vietnam is a good testing ground to try new strategies and tactics, while minimizing casualties. They have no way of matching China's air and naval power, thus we can bombard them from the sky and sea with impunity. Once their major command and communication structures are taken out, ground forces can mop up any disorganized resistance. I predict no more than 2000 casualties in total, compared to nearly 30,000 in 1979.

Also, a short war will put a dent into their economic growth, while driving up their inflation. They will have no choice but to further depend on China in the future to stay afloat. A military loss would lead to massive unrest against the Vietnamese government, draining their resources away from South China Sea. It also serves as a warning to Philippines of the potential consequences. For these reasons, I think a short campaign lasting no more than a month would be acceptable to China.
 
1. Well, incursion into Chinese border such as Malipo (老山) in Yunnan province as well as Chinese held island counts definitely counts incursions. Your troop is on our land, what you planned is irrelevant.
2. China builds roads and airports in a lot of places. Lots of them are used to support YOU in your war with US.
3. Of course we mobilized, Vietnam incursions started way before 78, 79 is just the time that we gathered enough force to begin the actual retaliation.
4. Whatever Khmer Rouge do is completely irrelevant to us, we don't control that country and we certainly don't influence their decision making.



Right...because whatever Cambodia did, it justified Vietnam on incurring into Chinese lands. This is equivalent of saying Iraq going to attack and occupy US lands because something Iranians did. (Iran was an US ally back then). Not only is this illogical, it is also plain stupid as history showed China's response to that.

1, any record time?
2, all start after Vietnam war end. while China did not do such a thing in Cambodia before that.
You double check pls
3, any record?
4, if china think as you say, means China is not responsible for what Khmer Rouge? agree. so China support to keep Khmer Rouge in place is war criminal or not? No?
so why China think that they have right to invade Vietnam ?
because stopping Khmer Rouge, because Vietnam process the counter strike to Khmer Rouge after their massacre to Vietnamese since 1977 , 1978 in Vietnam land?
 
Since 1979, Chinese military has revolutionized itself through modernization and downsizing. I do think that Vietnam is a good testing ground to try new strategies and tactics, while minimizing casualties. They have no way of matching China's air and naval power, thus we can bombard them from the sky and sea with impunity. Once their major command and communication structures are taken out, ground forces can mop up any disorganized resistance. I predict no more than 2000 casualties in total, compared to nearly 30,000 in 1979.

Also, a short war will put a dent into their economic growth, while driving up their inflation. They will have no choice but to further depend on China in the future to stay afloat. A military loss would lead to massive unrest against the Vietnamese government, draining their resources away from South China Sea. It also serves as a warning to Philippines of the potential consequences. For these reasons, I think a short campaign lasting no more than a month would be acceptable to China.
You are even no one. An average Chinese dislike your aggression.
 
1, any record time?
2, all start after Vietnam war end. while China did not do such a thing in Cambodia before that.
You double check pls
3, any record?
4, if china think as you say, means China is not responsible for what Khmer Rouge? agree. so China support to keep Khmer Rouge in place is war criminal or not? No?
so why China think that they have right to invade Vietnam ?
because stopping Khmer Rouge, because Vietnam process the counter strike to Khmer Rouge after their massacre to Vietnamese since 1977 , 1978 in Vietnam land?

The Chinese wikipedia include a decent read on the issue, including Vietnam persecution of ethic Chinese as well as incursion into Chinese lands.
1979年中越战争 - 维基百科,自由的百科全书
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom