What's new

The Kashmir Resolutions - Explanations

Salim your arguments are baseless. Kashmiris are being treated like Prisoners, for one they have half the Indian army at their doors, raping, killing and taking away there freedom. You are basically accepting that they shouldnt have any rights as long as they dont want to be a part of India. What a choice.

They have all the rights until they take up arms against the state or spread
separatist propaganda.
When they do, they are arrested for anti-national activities.


Tell me one place in Pakistan where the same laws are not applied.


Ok, that would mean there is no democracy for the vast majority of Kashmiris, so they are prisoners. So much for the integral part.

The vast majority of Kashmiris are peaceful. They successfully held fair elections last year, as the whole world acknowledges.

The people who resort to violent means are treated as criminals, and that is anything but unfair.

I know a lot of Kashmiris and I can tell you right now that 99% of Muslim Kashmiris will either vote for complete Independence or join Pakistan. I have never come across a single Muslim Kashmiri in person who wanted to be a part of India. Indian claims that Kashmiris will change their minds when they see the economic gains are ridiculous and laughable. Is it meant to be a bribe or you getting desperate for reasons to give them?

Don't be stupid and call the chance to lead a comfortable life a bribe. Live doesn't revolve around religion. People need to feed their families as well.

I really don't understand the hypocritical mindset of people like you.

Its called being practical and thinking with your brain and not your backside.

Separatist movements arise mainly due to unemployment and poverty, and if taken care of, people can lead decent lives and become a part of mainstream society.
The times of imperialism are over. In modern times, everyone is free to choose their vocation and their way of life, including Kashmiris.

Isn't that why the Gwadar port is being built in Balochistan? To integrate the tribals with mainstream?

Also, I wonder how many thousand kashmiris you have met in your life.


Dont insult real democracies, India is nothing but a Brahmin dictatorship. If anything opposes the Hindu majority, you get the Sikh massacres of 1984 and the Muslim massacres of 2001. Not to mention the other massacres in Assam, Manipur and Mao.
India holding on to Kashmir just shows that Indians dont consider Kashmiris as human beings. What kind of selfishness does it take to allow such suffering just for self satisfaction?

Right, I am ignoring the ranting against India here also, kindly desist from hate speech and such irresponsible comments. Also kindly look at what Pakistan is doing before calling India an evil hindu country.
 
Are you denying that a massacre took place, or just labelling it "a rant" because you have no argument.
And from what I just read, you have no understanding of Kashmir or Islam if you think the violent uprising in Kashmir was caused by poverty. Jesus...
 
Well, what I don't understand is, if Musharraf is sincere in his demand for a free kashmir, why isn't he unilaterally giving "Azad" kashmir its azadi.

India, as you say, is quite clear on the issue. No plebiscite and no separation for Kashmr. India is evil and oppressive. Fine. I'll let that pass just to narrow down the argument.

Oh of course, and let India pull another Siachen. India's official position still is "Integral part of India", what does that imply to you, with respect to India's actions, were Pakistan to pull out? But does this point really need elaborating?


I"m sure seeing the situation in Pakistan right now, no sane group of people will want to become a part of it, unless they have been brainwashed.

All the less reason for India to have any qualms about allowing a plebiscite.

Reports coming out of the valley indicate that pro-Pakistanis are realizing the folly of fighting to join Pakistan, seeing the current situation there. They are thinking practically and looking to better their lives.

Ah yes.. the reports based on "Indian Intel".
 
Not really - the arguments RR laid out in the first few posts, with references and highlights and the correspondence from UN officials was quite clear as to where blame was being assigned, and how the demilitarization was to take place, which is not how Indians paint it.

If you have rebuttals to the points raised in those firs posts, please do so in that thread, rather than just grandstanding that 'the thread was inconclusive'.

No its not. I disagree; the forces were never removed. Only after the forces from your side were to be removed, were we to go back.

These resolutions also had demographic constraints (which have been violated by the GoP and the separatists) and were binding for the entire state (and not just the Valley).

Plus, why does everyone ignore that Pakistan has separated Gilgit and Baltistan from the erstwhile state and these are now forever in Pakistan? Why overlook the territory China has occupied? What about the region "transferred" to the PRC?

And as far as my conclusion goes... I'll stand by it.

These resolutions are now outdated and no longer hold any ground.
 
No its not. I disagree; the forces were never removed. Only after the forces from your side were to be removed, were we to go back.
Then you haven't read the posts properly.

The resolutions specifically says "while being withdrawn", and the next post clearly points out where India was considered guilty. Please specifically point out where RR's argument is wrong, referencing his posts, instead of just typing an opinion saying that he is wrong.

These resolutions also had demographic constraints (which have been violated by the GoP and the separatists) and were binding for the entire state (and not just the Valley).

Plus, why does everyone ignore that Pakistan has separated Gilgit and Baltistan from the erstwhile state and these are now forever in Pakistan? Why overlook the territory China has occupied? What about the region "transferred" to the PRC?
But India never even brought that up with Pakistan, that she woudl only implement the resolutions if NA's and AC were included into the mix, instead she just refused, and she refused before any demographic changes were large enough to have any impact - so that argument does not fly.
These resolutions are now outdated and no longer hold any ground.
Unless you can show that the resolutions had a time limit they are not outdated - that India considers them so because it does not want the people of the region to decide their fate is obvious, but it does not reduce their legitimacy, nor that of the condition of a plebiscite built into the Instrument of Accession.
 
No its not. I disagree; the forces were never removed. Only after the forces from your side were to be removed, were we to go back.

AM is right. You're trolling. This has been made so clear in many many posts in this thread. Pakistani forces did not have to be completely removed. They only had to start withdrawing. Then UNCIP would ask India to agree to reducing its troop numbers. That was the sequence of events that was supposed to occur. The break in the chain occurred when India did not agree to reduce its troop number down to 18,000, instead insisting on 24,000 at least (Pakistan had agreed to reducing down to 6,000) 24,000 : 6,000 is a 4:1 ratio..

Here is the resolution in question that says Pakistani troops did not have to withdraw completely before India had agreed to reduce its troop numbers. The phrase "are being" means the Pakistani troops did not have to evacuate the region, they just needed to start the withdrawal.

Resolution adopted by the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan on 13 August 1948.
(Document No.1100, Para. 75, dated the 9th November, 1948).

(1) As the presence of troops of Pakistan in the territory of the State of Jammu and Kashmir constitutes a material change in the situation since it was represented by the Government of Pakistan before the Security Council, the Government of Pakistan agrees to withdraw itstroops from that State. CHECK - Pakistan agreed

(2) The Government of Pakistan will use its best endeavour to secure the withdrawal from theState of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistan nationals not normally resident thereinwho have entered the State for the purpose of fighting. CHECK - Pakistan tried

(3) Pending a final solution the territory evacuated by the Pakistan troops will be administered by the local authorities under the surveillance of the commission. - CHECK - Pakistan awaited the following

When the Commission shall have notified the Government of India that the tribesmen and Pakistani nationals referred to in Part II, A, 2 hereof have withdrawn, thereby terminating the situation which was represented by the Government of India to the Security Council as having occasioned the presence of Indian forces in the State of Jammu and Kashmir, and further, that the Pakistani forces are being withdrawn from the State of Jammu and Kashmir, the Government of India agrees to begin to withdraw the bulk of its forces from that State in stages to be agreed upon with the Commission.- CHECK - "are being withdrawn", when Pakistani troops ARE BEING withdrawn, then India must agree to reduce its troops.


These resolutions also had demographic constraints (which have been violated by the GoP and the separatists) and were binding for the entire state (and not just the Valley).

What demographic constraints? If you mean that the number of Hindus has decreased since 1947, then you're wrong. The number of Hindus have increased in Kashmir since 1947, and the number of Muslims has decreased.

Plus, why does everyone ignore that Pakistan has separated Gilgit and Baltistan from the erstwhile state and these are now forever in Pakistan? Why overlook the territory China has occupied? What about the region "transferred" to the PRC?

And as far as my conclusion goes... I'll stand by it.

These resolutions are now outdated and no longer hold any ground.

The UN resolutions do not have an expiry date. They remain until a conflict is resolved.
 
Excerpts from an article detailing some of Nehru's positions on Kashmir, and how he had unilaterally determined that no referendum woudl be held in Kashmir. This in my opinion validates the assertions made at the beginning of the thread that India was to blame for the lack of implementation of the UNSC resolutions, since Nehru quite clearly did not want to do so:

--------------------------
Against this background, Nehru's letter to Bakshi on the 1957 Assembly elections tells us a lot. He condoned a wrong and licensed it for the future. Polling was held on March 25 in Jammu and on March 30 in the Valley. Bakshi invited him to visit Jammu for electioneering and mentioned, tongue in cheek, there would be only eight contests in the Valley because many of the candidates opposing the N.C. were eliminated owing to omissions in the nomination papers. Nehru sent a very Nehruvian reply on March 10: "I agree with you that it was very unfortunate that nearly all the opposition candidates in Kashmir proper had been practically eliminated even before polling," adding revealingly: "This has had a bad effect in other countries." How very "unfortunate", indeed. On March 17, he issued an appeal to the electorate to vote for the N.C.'s candidates.

The same style was in play on adherence to the pledge to hold a plebiscite. Nehru wrote to Bakshi on March 13, 1957: "Perhaps, you have noticed that at no time have I said that under no circumstances will there be a plebiscite. What I have said is that a plebiscite is not a feasible proposition after all that has happened, and that Pakistan has not fulfilled the conditions necessary for it. When I have been asked if we will be agreeable to a plebiscite if every condition was fulfilled, my answer has been that this is a hypothetical question which can only be considered when such a situation arises.

"I know that you and Pantji and some others have often said that there can never be a plebiscite in Jammu & Kashmir State. I think that that kind of a statement is not helpful at present, certainly from the point of view of people in the outside world, though it may be helpful in Kashmir." Do what you will inside Kashmir but be smart enough to cover up for "the outside world"
. Union Home Minister G.B. Pant could not have ruled out plebiscite in Srinagar on July 7, 1955 without Nehru's prior approval.

On April 2, 1956, he himself had made statements at a press conference, which suggested that he had, indeed, ruled out a plebiscite. A question was put to him: "An inference has been drawn that you do not want now any plebiscite to be held in Kashmir. Is it correct?" Nehru replied: "Largely so; I shall explain myself. What I have said was that we have tried and discussed the question of plebiscite for six or seven years, but the preconditions have not been fulfilled. Meanwhile, other things have taken place, like the military aid etc., which have increased tremendously the difficulties of this problem. It is not that I am not willing to discuss this problem still further. But as a practical person I say this leads to a blind alley. We have, therefore, to discuss it from another point of view in regard to conditions that have arisen now and try to come to an agreement."

Offer of a settlement on the basis of the ceasefire line was the logical corollary. Nehru made this offer while addressing a public meeting in New Delhi on April 18, 1956. "I am willing to accept that the question of the part of Kashmir which is under you should be settled by demarcating the border on the basis of the present ceasefire line. We have no desire to take it by fighting."

The volume contains Nehru's notes on his talks with the last U.N. mediator on Kashmir, Gunnar Jarring, on March 26, April 6 and 8, 1957. Ahead of that, a note to the Commonwealth Secretary on March 19, 1957 summed up his policy. The Prime Minister of Pakistan Feroz Khan Noor "is a bumptuous bounder". This was very true. Not so the claim that "we have carried out every commitment that we have made". The policy he had adopted was set out in explicit terms: "We do not propose to make any proposals or suggestions except on the basis of Pakistan vacating the aggression." Talks with Jarring were doomed to failure.
---------------------------------
http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2315/stories/20060811000507900.htm
 
When the Commission shall have notified the Government of India that the tribesmen and Pakistani nationals referred to in Part II, A, 2 hereof have withdrawn, thereby terminating the situation which was represented by the Government of India to the Security Council as having occasioned the presence of Indian forces in the State of Jammu and Kashmir, and further, that the Pakistani forces are being withdrawn from the State of Jammu and Kashmir, the Government of India agrees to begin to withdraw the bulk of its forces from that State in stages to be agreed upon with the Commission.-

This is interesting. So the UN Commission has to notify India of two things:

(1) That the "tribesmen and Pakistani nationals" have withdrawn
(2) That the Pakistani forces are being withdrawn.

Once this is done, then the Government of India agrees to begin withdrawal of most (but not all) of its troops, in stages, as agreed between India and the UN Commission.

Since the UN Commission never gave this notification to the Government of India, India cannot be held responsible for blocking the implementation.
 
Last edited:
This is interesting. So the UN Commission has to notify India of two things:

(1) That the "tribesmen and Pakistani nationals" have withdrawn
(2) That the Pakistani forces are being withdrawn.

Once this is done, then the Government of India agrees to begin withdrawal of most (but not all) of its troops, in stages, as agreed between India and the UN Commission.

Since the UN Commission never gave this notification to the Government of India, India cannot be held responsible for blocking the implementation.

Not true, at least per the words of the UNCIP official quoted here:

Sir Owen Dixon, Head of the UN Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP), in his report to the Security Council on 15 September 1950. He stated that, “in the end I became convinced that India’s agreement would never be obtained to demilitarization in any form or to provisions governing the period of plebiscite of such character, as would in my opinion, permit the plebiscite being conducted in conditions sufficiently guarding against intimidation and other forms of influence and abuse by which freedom and fairness of the plebiscite might be imperiled."

The official would have had to have entered into negotiations and contact with Indian authorities before he could come to a conclusion that Indian agreement would not be obtained.
 
Not true, at least per the words of the UNCIP official quoted here:

The official would have had to have entered into negotiations and contact with Indian authorities before he could come to a conclusion that Indian agreement would not be obtained.


One would have to read the full report of the said UN official to see what he has to say about Pakistan. One would also have to look into the said official's neutrality.

In any case the official is giving his opinion about a hypothetical scenario about what might happen after Pakistan withdrew its tribesmen and nationals, and began withdrawing its forces - which are conditions that Pakistan never complied with in the first place.

Anyway, the UN resolutions are quite impractical today for various reasons - demographic tampering in the Northern areas, impossibility of handing over Hindu and Buddhist areas to an Islamic nation, and so on.

So this discussion is basically academic.
 
One would have to read the full report of the said UN official to see what he has to say about Pakistan. One would also have to look into the said official's neutrality.

In any case the official is giving his opinion about a hypothetical scenario about what might happen after Pakistan withdrew its tribesmen and nationals, and began withdrawing its forces - which are conditions that Pakistan never complied with in the first place.

Anyway, the UN resolutions are quite impractical today for various reasons - demographic tampering in the Northern areas, impossibility of handing over Hindu and Buddhist areas to an Islamic nation, and so on.

So this discussion is basically academic.
Not at all - if any of the reasosn you have articulated are valid, then the way to render the resolutions obsolete is to go back to the UNSC and make that case and ask for fresh resolutions. Until then these resolutions stand.

On the issues of 'neutrality and complete report' feel free to find what you can and post it. We have made the case from the Pakistani side, if you wish to counter it you need to provide sources to back up what you said. Otherwise I see no reason to suspect the officials neutrality. His comments on suspecting Indian intentions are backed up by Nehru's own comments on not holding a referendum.

As I said in the other thread, what is important is the principle of self-determination. This could be implemented in K Valley and AK alone, among various other possibilities, with J&L and NA's retaining the status quo.
 
On one hand we have the indisputable failure of the Pakistani side to honour its commitments. On the other side all we have is speculation as to what India would have done had Pakistan actually honoured its commitments.

In any case the UN resolutions are dead. If blame is to be assigned, then the blame goes to Pakistan.


Not at all - if any of the reasosn you have articulated are valid, then the way to render the resolutions obsolete is to go back to the UNSC and make that case and ask for fresh resolutions. Until then these resolutions stand.

No - Pakistan and India have specifically agreed in the Simla agreement to solve the Kashmir problem (and in fact all problems) bilaterally. So there is no question of involving any other party, including the UN.

As you have mentioned in this post, the Simla agreement states that the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations shall govern the relations between the two countries.

The mutual agreement by Pakistan and India that the Kashmir dispute be resolved bilaterally does not in any way contradict the UN Charter.

As I said in the other thread, what is important is the principle of self-determination. This could be implemented in K Valley and AK alone, among various other possibilities, with J&L and NA's retaining the status quo.

In any final settlement, Pakistan will have to give the same treatment to the Northern areas as India gives to the valley.
 
Last edited:
Indian attrocities in Kashmir:

Presently, the situation in Kashmir, according to international organiasations & global media has not changed yet very much. It is still alarming and sparking flames in South Asia, that more then seven hundred thousand Indian army deployed in a small 40 -80 square miles area is the heaviest concentration in human history, and its all without any moral, political and legal code. 92 thousand Kashmiris have been killed by the Indian army in 17 years.



Since January 1989 to April 30, 2007:



Total killing. 91,865


Custodial Killing 6,899


Women gang raped


& Molested 9,708


Civilian arrested 113,798


Structures arsoned /


Destroyed 105,353


Children orphaned 106,930


Women widowed 22,530



The International NGO's Amnesty International, Human rights watch, Asia watch, Red Cross, Medicine sans frontier and others are not allowed to visit Kashmir. Torture is widespread, particularly in the temporary detention centres; methods of torture include electric shock, prolonged beatings and sexual molestation of innocent women.


Kashmir is a disputed territory. Presently, the ceasefire line between the forces of India and Pakistan has divided Kashmir into two parts. One part is under Indian occupation: this comprises 63% of the whole territory and includes the Vale; it has a population 7.5 million. The other part, with approximately 3 million people, includes Azad Kashmir and the Northern region of Gilgit and Baltistan and is administered by Pakistan. About 1.5 million Kashmiris are refugees in Pakistan, some 400,000 live in Britain, and about 250,000 are scattered around the world. The present arbitrary bifurcation of Kashmir has resulted in the division of thousands of Kashmiri families.


Kashmiris living there have no life safety and human honour. Women are degraded and humiliated, almost 10 thousands women are raped; not only adult women but even eight year old girls are victimised.


Since the Indian government crackdown against Kashmiris in the disputed territory of Kashmir began in earnest in January 1990, security forces and Indian army have used rape as a weapon: to punish, intimidate, coerce, humiliate and degrade. Rape by Indian security forces most often occurs during crackdowns, cordon-and-search operations during which men are held for identification in parks or schoolyards while security forces search their homes. In these situations, the security forces frequently engage in collective punishment against the civilian population by assaulting residents and burning their homes. Rape is used as a means of targeting women to punish and humiliate the entire community. Rape has also occurred frequently during reprisal attacks on civilians. In many of these attacks, the selection of victims is seemingly arbitrary and the women, like other civilians assaulted or killed, are targeted simply because they happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Women who are the victims of rape are often stigmatised, and their testimony and integrity impugned. Social attitudes which cast the woman, and not her attacker, as the guilty party pervade the judiciary, making rape cases difficult to prosecute and leaving women unwilling to press charges.


Government authorities have failed to bring the culprits on record. The normal trend of the Government during these years is to hide the atrocities committed by the Indian armed and paramilitary forces in order to dodge the Amnesty International and the world Human Rights Organization.


Various NGOs and human rights organisations are working for feminism and other civil & social rights, but in my opinion no satisfied work regarding Kashmiri women's safety and modesty. Women and Children are the victim of the worst human rights violations in this area of armed conflicts and ethnic war. It is crystal clear that sexual violence, which was used to subjugate and destroy a people as a form of ethnic cleansing, was an abhorrent and heinous war crime. These persistent and gross abuses, flagrant denials of the human rights of women and their right to life itself, demanded an urgent response from international human rights bodies.


According to data maintained by a media portal of United Kingdom (UK) on reported cases of rape and molestation in which security forces were allegedly involved, nearly 500 women were raped in various parts of Jammu and Kashmir between1990-1994. Media portal maintains that it has compiled the reports from what was reported by state media. The portal maintains that non-governmental organisations (NGO) hardly took interest in documenting the plight of these silent sufferers of Jammu and Kashmir.


According to a 1994 United Nations publication from 1990 to 1996, 882 women were reportedly gang-raped by security forces in Jammu and Kashmir. But Social Stigma associated with word "Rape" has made work of human rights and women NGOs cumbersome. They say that women are reluctant to come forward. Extra Judicial killings, rapes, custodial killings, kidnappings, burning of houses by Indian security forces within IHK remain a common practice. The whole IHK has risen against the Indian Army and the Armed Forces Special Powers Act AFSPA and POTA that enables the Indian Army to arrest and kill anyone, anytime, anywhere, in a bid to suppress the ongoing Kashmir liberation movement, the Indian authorities have laid a network of torture cells to practice human rights violations. In these torture cells, the worst repressive means such as electric shocks, ironing of sensitive parts of body, are practised against the innocent Kashmiris without caring for the age and health conditions. Besides, the female folk are also taken to these centres where they are reportedly gang-raped for protesting against the Indian brutalities or filing complaints against terrorising of their near and dear ones.


This poverty struck women have nothing to feed their children. Their husbands went missing and they could not even wail over their missing husbands.1000 widows, whose husbands have disappeared but not been proven dead. Their children were killed in front of their eyes and yet they are doing rounds of the government offices to prove that their children were killed in cold blood. The dreaded attack by soldiers and an assault on their honour and body remains in the minds of every woman in Kashmir. The young widows and teenaged orphan girls are facing more problems due to their youth as they are always at danger of getting molested or raped. It is matter of concern that most of the married women face the problem of miscarriages, which is one of the fastest growing problem in the rural and border areas of Kashmir.


These happenings are not confined to Muslims. In the last 16 years the women of Kashmir have had to bear male vengeance in silence and they have been unable to find spare to transcend that. Estimates given by various organisations place widowS between 30 000 to 40 000 and Orphans between 50 000 to 80 000.the raped women are doubly victimised and have to live the rest of their carrying to stamp of stigma in silence."


The peace process began three years ago between India and Pakistan on Kashmir, and there has been dozens of talks for 60 years, three wars in 1947, 1965 and 1971, thousands of innocent peoples from both sides have been killed. But the end is no where in sight. The United Nations had 6 resolutions passed time to time but justice, and implementation of these resolutions have been delayed.


It is imperative that the United Nations, European Union and Organisation of Islamic Conference and other powers to start the negotiation and mediation with Kashmiri leadership and influential organisations from both sides of Kashmir. Because both countries Pakistan and India have got nuclear capacity because of Kashmir. Political pundits predict cloud of nuclear war is seeing on sky of South Asia clearly. In these difficult circumstances, this dress code edict is simply misplaced, if not a deliberately planted red herring. More pain for the Kashmiri women, thousands of whom have already lost their husbands, sons and loved ones to the bullets and atrocities of the marauding Indian soldiers and many of whom have also fallen victim to sexual defilement.


The European parliament has adopted MEP Emma Nicholson report titled "Kashmir; Present situation and future prospects" on May 25, 2007, by an overwhelming 522 votes in favour to 19 votes against. The report recognised Kashmiris right to self-determination, deploring massive human rights abuses in Jammu & Kashmir, encouraging the Peace process between India and Pakistan and emphasising inclusion of Kashmiris in the Peace process. The Amnesty International released a latest Global report 2007 said in that there is many violence, torture, custodial deaths enforced disappearances and extra-judicial executions continued in Jammu & Kashmir in the year 2006.


Rape in war is not merely a matter of chance nor is it a question of sex. It is rather a question of power and control which is `structured by male soldiers' notions of their masculine privilege. Kashmir is rising flame, which is increasing speedily. If United Nations, European Union and other world wide NGO's do not succeeded in finding an acceptable solution with the participation of kashmiris, it will cause disaster for this part of South Asia. World powers and Global Institutions need to understand this burning issue.


The people of Kashmir demand an end to the military occupation of their land. Because they demand what they have been pledged by both India and Pakistan and guaranteed by the United Nations Security Council with the unequivocal endorsement of the United States, demilitrisation of Kashmir and a free plebiscite vote organised impartially.


Every Kashmiri is waiting anxiously for somebody to help attain freedom for them. I am a women so I understand feelings and emotions, inner voice of every Kashmiri woman.



Farhat Jabeen is Student of PhD

HR Kashmir: Rape of Kashmiri women and the South Asia
 
A team of doctors who performed autopsy of Maqbool at Charari Sharif Hospital on Saturday told Greater Kashmir that “he died due to cardiac arrest caused by extensive torture and multiple burns. His private parts had been damaged.”

Quoting Ritu Dewan, a professor at Mumbai University who studied the impact of presence of troops in Kashmir pointed out, "Women face other milder forms of sexual violence like eve teasing and molestation. Next to girls schools and hostels, there are camps of troops and the result is continuous sexual harassment, passing of comments, molestation, snatching of dupattas, pulling away of burqas, singing cheap filmi songs, taunting, teasing, obscene gestures etc." Shekhawat said because of these, young women become more burdened by the pressures of patriarchal scrutiny, whereby their freedom of mobility gets largely curtailed.

“I pleaded before the troopers that I am expecting a baby and have to immediately reach the hospital. But they hit my stomach and private parts with rifle ***** and batons. I helplessly cried for mercy but they continued to thrash me. Finally I started to bleed profusely and fell unconscious,” she said and broke down.



Baby, Delivery, Freedom, Gujrat, Hospital, HR Abuses, Independence, India, Indian Army, Kashmir, Oppression, Torture
Gujrat In Kashmir
In Human Rights, Kashmir on 29 August, 2008 at 5:48 pm

“I pleaded before the troopers that I am expecting a baby and have to immediately reach the hospital. But they hit my stomach and private parts with rifle ***** and batons. I helplessly cried for mercy but they continued to thrash me. Finally I started to bleed profusely and fell unconscious,” she said and broke down.

Source Greater Kashmir

What can you say about a woman eight months pregnant who begged to be spared. Her assailants instead slit open her stomach, pulled out her fetus and slaughtered it before her eyes.

Source Boloji

But this then is the character of the Nation called India, it matters not whether the assailants are wearing government approved uniforms or not, they have the approval from the corridors of power. Be it the blue turbaned Manmohan Singh or the poet Atal Behari.
 
:. Latest study says 66% Kashmiris tortured



Srinagar, Oct 16: An international organisation research on the Kashmir conflict has reported that 85 per cent of Valley population have confrontation with the violence while 66 percent have witnessed torture.

The research was conducted in two districts across 30 villages from the last three months and those occurring since the start of the conflict by the web portal Online Portal - Covering Headlines, Business, Family, Entertainment, Webmastering and much more. - 7thSpace Interactive, to assess experiences with violence and mental health status among the conflict-affected Kashmiri population.

The survey reported that the civilian population in Kashmir is exposed to high levels of violence, as demonstrated by the high frequency of deliberate events as detention, hostage, and torture.

Respondents reported frequent direct confrontations with violence since the start of conflict, including exposure to crossfire (85.7%), round up raids (82.7%), the witnessing of torture (66.9%), rape (13.3%), and self-experience of forced labour (33.7%), arrests/kidnapping (16.9%), torture (12.9%), and sexual violence (11.6%).

The male population has reported more confrontations with violence than females, and had an increased likelihood of having directly experienced physical/mental maltreatment, violation of their modesty, and injury. Males also had high odds of self-being arrested/ kidnap. The portal’s survey found that Kashmiri male population reported significantly more confrontations with almost all violent events; this can be explained by higher participation in outdoor activities. The reported violence may result in substantial health, including mental health problems, the survey noted.

The survey found high levels of psychological distress that impacts on daily life and places a burden on the health system. Ongoing feelings of personal vulnerability (not feeling safe) were associated with high levels of psychological distress.

Over one-third of respondents were found to have symptoms of psychological distress, women scored significantly higher. A third of respondents had contemplated suicide.

Community mental health programmes should be considered as a way reduce the pressure on the health system and improve socio-economic functioning of those suffering from mental health problems.

The ongoing conflict exacts a huge toll on the communities' mental well-being, writes the portal.

The survey was done as part of routine programme evaluation to assess confrontation with violence and its consequences on mental health, health service usage, and socio-economic functioning.

[Rising Kashmir]

[KW Note: Jammu and Kashmir is the U.N. recognized disputed state under the illegal occupation of India since 1947.

Since 1988, the disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir has been hit by confrontation between Kashmiri Freedom Fighters and the Indian Military, which has resulted in more than One hundred thousand of deaths. Unofficial sources put the number of Indian troops deployed in the state to seven hundred thousand.

According to Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons (APDP) an estimated 8 to 10 thousand persons have become victims of Enforced or Involuntary Disappearance (EID).



“The Indian Kashmir has witnessed one of the biggest ever anti-India and pro-freedom marches in the recent past. According to estimates 1.8 million people participated in one of the freedom marches organized by the separatist leadership,” American Chronicle reports in a news story.]


http://www.kashmirwatch.com/showhea...chive=&start_from=&ucat=1&var0news=value0news
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom