Halaku Khan
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2008
- Messages
- 699
- Reaction score
- 0
At least you now acknowledge that the UN resolutions take presidence over the Simla agreement, and nothing in Simla can legally override those resolutions. Good. That is the first part to you understanding the Kashmir issue better.
Actually, the UN resolutions being dead, the question of their precedence over anything does not arise.
Now, for the second part. It does not matter if the "situation" has changed. It is whether the applicability of the resolutions still exist. And yes, they do exist, because the sole purpose of the UN resolutions was to give the vote to the Kashmiri people. This applies now as it did when the resolution was past.
The Buddhist/Hindu/Muslim areas are irrelevently grouped anyhow. They are all Kashmiris, that is the important thing. It is up to them to decide their fate through the vote, as the UN resolutions call for.
No, it would completely outrageous, horrifying and contrary to all civilized laws to even consider handing over Buddhists and Hindus to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, in which they would have to live as second class citizens, if at all they are allowed to live. That is a major reason why the UN resolutions are dead, although there are other reasons too.
Last edited: