I categorically said all Indians can voice their opinions through their elected leaders. Also the court can veto any laws if they are against constitution. Also the independent media is allowed to voice its opinion and criticize govt if needed. When did I say that any community is allowed to blackmail the govt through undemocratic means?
Its UTTER RUBBISH to claim Unelected Judges of the Courts can impose their will on the Elected Representatives and the people they represent.
NOTHING is over and above the Will of the people of India as expressed by the Elected Representative.
You would start with stripping voting rights, but it would end with much more. You cant stop an avalanche after starting it. Moreover, there is no real demand from the rest of India for any NRC. Only few leaders from ruling party are making noise for electoral gains through polarization.
I would request you to keep your debate civil. There is no need to go down to name calling for proving your point.
I am not interested in your pathetic and desperate attempt at playing "Victim" when the call is for stripping Non-citizen of their ILLEGALLY obtained Voting rights.
IF THAT does not work then I would certainly advocate Stronger steps. Let there be NO DOUBT about that. Defence of rights of Indian citizens are supreme.
Since NRC is in the BJP manifesto and BJP has been voted to power TWICE with Convincing majority, the WILL of the people of India is KNOWN. You are NO ONE to claim otherwise.
We are not talking about people in non-neighboring countries. I agree that we have some moral responsibility and we can give citizenship to persecuted people on case-by-case basis. But that should be the last option as we cannot allow large number of people. We should first do all we can to work with our neighboring countries so that they are not persecuted at home. Pakistani and BD Hindus would ideally not want to leave their homes and settle in a new location.
NO. Indian responsibility extends to ALL Hindus of the Neighborhood and Yes, working with BD to safeguard their rights is the FIRST THING TO DO.
Next would be to offer citizenship to persecuted Hindus.
LAST would be to claim land from the Neighbors ifs the flood of Hindus become too large.
Finally DON'T YOU DARE speak for the Hindus of BD and paksitan. Who the Fcuk made you their spokesperson ?
You are right that secularism in our country is still imperfect. Lets make it better by implementing uniform civil code rather than reject secularism.
Our constitution has already rejected secularism. UCC is aslo a demand of the Constituion.
You made a statement so I would expect you to back up with proof.[/QUOTE]
google it first. I have provided in the past in pdf where it has been discussed umpteen times.
When did I say that Indian constitution keeps BD citizens safe? You are incorrectly attributing stuff to me.
No more than your straw-man arguments, virtue signalling and outright victim card claims.
You can't really hold a discussion with a fascist can you?
Why stop at punching a Nazi ?
How about cutting the head of a Kafir for Blasphemy ?
Last edited: