Yes and no...likewise, common men in West is also not bothered by the common Muslim (in todays world) just a handful which - in terms of Mujahidin were funded by America for cold war agendas...other shit grew themselves thanks to 2 MUSLIM (or calling themselves so) states hating and propagating against each other...THAT much I do agree...
No, my point was that sure the British committed acts of genocide, which im not disputing, but they did give something back to those whom they conquered:
A example of this would be Pakistan's Armed Forces, particularly the Army, which has its roots within the British Army and is modeled after the latter.
So killing those busy killing themselves can be justified then we need to wipe out large chunks of Middle East, Russia, Africa and also some parts of Europe where mafia are ruling while other parts of the world where their own shoot children at school?
No, i'm not justifying killing anyone, the past can't be altered, so what's done is done. I'm drawing a comparison here between Europeans and Muslims. What will Muslims give to Europe if they become the dominant group of people??
To answer my own question one has to only look at the Middle east and other Muslim countries.
So is it justified to kill them and then take care of their descendants? No...a wrong done triggers a chain reaction is all I am saying....wrong done to Africans came back as the woolwich killing and many other forms....
Nowhere did i say or imply that killing someone was justified. My point was that Europeans own up to their wrongs, but people for some reason still like to whine and cry about European colonization, but yet don't ask Muslims to own up to their crimes.
Is your question towards Arabs or towards Muslims? Coz not ALL MUSLIMS are Arabs and not ALL ARABS are Muslims....
I'll reiterate:
It is not only Arab mentality but a mentality which is prevalent throughout the entire Muslim world including within our very own
Pakistan. In Pakistan I have witnessed myself child labor and feudalism in which peasants are chained to the land of their masters, treated exactly like slaves. I have seen how Christian servants within wealthy Muslim homes are mistreated and not properly looked after.
And why no Muslims come out against Arabs??
Why the hypocrisy??
Why everyone wants to whine and complain about European slavery of Africans when Europeans themselves abolished slavery in 1865 after a bitter civil war against their own White/European brethren meanwhile in Arab countries slavery only recently ended (
on paper and only due to Western pressure) in 1970's??
Perhaps no other people are more racist and intolerant than Muslims. Is it any wonder why Pakistanis and other Muslims form massive lines outside of Western Embassies to acquire visas to live in the West and flee their own Islamic countries?? If White people are so "racist" and "intolerant" then why do Muslims try to get into their countries??
I know you are not ...and I am saying take the politics (Sultans) and normal people as 2 separate entities...
Since you brought up European colonization i only compared the state of the common man of the indian subcontinent under Mughal rule (pre-European colonization) with that under the British rule (also post-European colonization).
I'm not trying to combine politics and the average person, im just comparing their living standards under to separate eras.
Well...When an open letter sent by Scholars (who took the matter and did a thorough job at answering) was not bothered about what other voices are going to matter?
The average working class European who has to bear the brunt of immigrant crimes will not have exposure to any letter by some Imams or religious scholars. Things like this letter never reach the mainstream public because they don't have a strong projection, its just a piece of paper that millions of people will never see.
A better way to show the Europeans/Whites that majority of Muslims disown criminal elements within their communities would be through mass public demonstrations to which millions of people will be exposed to, similar to the one held for Gaza. Who can miss out seeing 15,000 people demonstrating against rapists and extremists??
I am not sure about this.....They should and no one is stopping them....However, it was unfortunate that the law already knew of these rapes and did nothing coz of the fear of being labelled as racist...I already posted 2 articles on this forum:
Why Did British Police Ignore Pakistani Gangs Abusing 1,400 Rotherham Children? Political Correctness - Forbes
I am saying this stupid fear of being label is what caused this shit and should be abolished...Its like treating one with an "extra" or as a "special" citizens...shouldnt all citizens be equal?
In this case it was the faulty judicial system and the politically correct nature of British Society which has resulted after decades of Marxist/Leftist influence within British institutions and media, and this is the state of affairs within every Western country.
Only with the establishment of a Nationalist and Fascist states can such state of affairs be reversed and currently it looks like that is exactly where things are headed with the rise of Nationalist sentiments all throughout the Western world.
It is only a natural response of the people.
As for the idiots who have uttered nothing about it are shameless....this was disgrace to everything but the poor girls....And I would suggest just hanging the bastards who are found guilty...they dont need jail time to correct themselves..they just need death to reduce the burden on this planet!
If those creatures could rape White girls then im certain they could have done the same to Muslims girls as well. To such scum nothing is sacred and its truly despicable that the Muslim community of Britain has remained silent on this.
Benefited not because of British benevolence, but because the British intended to keep India in their clutches. I understand the point you're making, though.
I'm not judging the intentions of the British, because im sure the Mughals and the Afghans under Ghori, Ghaznavi, etc, did not set off to conquer india with the intention of making the lives of the common inhabitant of the indian subcontinent better, but rather they come to india to loot and plunder its wealth.
I'm sure the British had similar intentions, no doubt.
I understand you're trying to point out the "double-standards" of Muslims, but the people who condemn the European past are mostly white liberals. I'm not going to apologize for some crimes which took place a few hundred years ago, and neither hsould Arab. It's funny seeing someone who hates liberals for the way they condemn pride in European heritage and instill "White Guilt" in a nation telling Arabs to apologize for crimes centuries ago. The way Arabs treat expats though, is a different story, and that should definitely be condemned.
How Arabs enslaved Black Africans is now history. There is nothing i or anyone could do to change the past however, my point for bringing that up was in response to those who use European colonization as an excuse for rapes, robberies, and terrorism against Whites. Of course i know Arabs won't apologize, they never do when they mistreat Pakistani workers after confiscating their passports on arrival.
Where'd you get that? Dailymail?
I'm not sure what you're asking. Make your question clear.
What gives you the impression Muslims of other ethnicities aren't critical of Arabs?
Because they're not.
Can you disprove what i said??
If all of these men were to be offered a American visa im sure they'd take it without even blinking:
