What's new

The Indian MIRV Technology : An Overview

WE have AESA radar on our warship,cool! please elaborate.

perhaps he is talking about 3-D medium power radar (300 Km) which is being designed and developed by drdo for air force :tup:
drdo may also develop it for navy destroyers as it did with 3-d CAR (revathi radar)

source is drdo jan10 newsletter

Dudes, Medium Power Radar (MPR) is in prototype/trial stage and the range should be more than 300 km depending on target RCS. Its not MPR, its our first AESA on ship.

Also DRDO developing AESA weapons locating radar to replace existing PESA WLRs.
 
.
24xlutz.jpg


India & MIRV Technology

What is a credible nuclear deterrence? This question is being debated in India for last couple of years without much of agreement amongst security experts. The debate normally focuses around issues such as what number of nuclear weapons should India possess? What should be the yield and type? Should the nature of nuclear threat envisaged from adversaries determine the number of weapons? Or should the type and number of targets which India proposes to engage to prove its second strike capability, decide the numbers we should possess?

3e296ffe-64fd-493f-9c2b-b5bdeb6599c9-733272.jpg

All these discussions have one basic premise and that is: one missile would deliver one nuclear warhead. India’s nuclear triad: a delivery system for nuclear missile from an aerial platform, ship/land based platform or a submarine also essentially caters for one nuclear warhead per one missile launch. However, all this could change and the debate on ‘quantifying’ nuclear deterrence would have to take an additional parameter into consideration in near future and that is India’s MIRV (multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicles) capabilities. India’s Defence Research Development Organisation (DRDO) is proposing to develop a new strategic weapon technology called MIRV.


8d25c20e-15b1-4112-9048-e7f16b4fa233-736315.jpg

MIRV technology is not a new technology. Rather it is a technology of the 1960s and was first developed by the US, followed by USSR. MIRV is a set of nuclear weapons carried on a single missile (intercontinental or submarine launched ballistic missile). This technology allows striking several targets in a single launch. During the launch the main rocket of this system pushes the set of warheads up in the atmosphere. Each warhead strikes a target separately. The launch of such missile constitutes firing a missile having multiple stages. During its ballistic path every stage gets separated at a predetermined time after the launch. Along with every stage one or more warheads get fired. A four stage missile could fire eight to ten warheads on the targets. For a standard launch normally 60 seconds after the launch the first stage separates and other two or three stages separate roughly with an interval of 60 seconds each.

The post boost vehicle which separates from the missile prepares for re-entry into the earth’s atmosphere. During all these maneuvers, warheads get fired after a gap of few seconds at pre-identified targets. The exact technology of firing sequence and how it actually happens has, for obvious reasons, always been kept a secret by states possessing this technology.


083fc2ec-59b6-4087-b8cd-e7f77997dac3-735650.jpg

For better understanding, parallels could be drawn from the multiple satellite launches undertaken by few states with a single launch vehicle. There have been cases where around eight to ten satellites have been launched in one go. The major difference is that these satellites are positioned in different orbits in space while in case of MIRV the warheads re-enter the earth’s atmosphere and fire on the target. The system is designed in such a fashion that the damage caused by several small warheads could be much more than that caused by a single warhead.

726a5eff-ce29-4ffd-8e27-18d4965f9871-734791.jpg

There are reports that now India’s premier defence research organization DRDO is validating technologies towards testing MIRV. According to DRDO officials, the platform for re-entry vehicles would be dissimilar from their earlier successful designs used in Agni series of missiles. It appears that they are testing a more modern technology.

Another challenge for the Indian scientists would be to design and develop a guiding system with a high degree of accuracy. Some are of the opinion that MIRV technology need not be viewed only with a nuclear backdrop and even conventional warheads could be placed onboard of such missile. It also needs to be noted that India is yet to prove its ICBM capabilities and is expected to test 5,000-km-range Agni-V missile shortly.


MIRV testing has received a significant amount of criticism too. This technology is known for reducing the impact of Strategic Arms Limitation Talks agreement (SALT). SALT talks about limiting the number of missiles but with MIRV the issue of number of missiles becomes irrelevant since a single missile can carry many warheads and cause significant destruction. Also, this technology reduces the importance of a missile defence shield. This is because such systems are capable of addressing only one missile threat at a time.


agni3sl%20mirv.jpg230999f9-5cac-48ff-9263-105ffea9261dLarger.jpg

Possession of MIRV technology is expected to boost India’s defence preparedness. DRDO’s willingness to invest in this technology clearly indicates that India’s missile programme has matured considerably. Coming years would see greater Indian investment in micro-electro mechanical systems (MEMS), nano-sensors, nano-materials and advanced information technology tools.

Such investments would be essential for creating reliable and robust but highly accurate systems like MIRV. This technology would certainly boost India’s nuclear deterrence capabilities. It also needs to be appreciated that the technologies developed for MIRV would find direct or indirect applicability in various other fields of defence too.



THE PROOF of INDIAN CAPABILITY​





080620-F-1234P-006.jpg
So after 6 years let's see how many of these Indian dreams actually came to reality?
 
. . . .
Because we can launch multiple satellites since years which is one of first steps towards MIRV capabilities.
Pakistan cannot launch even two 5 kg sats.
USA Put man on the moon in 1968 but had MIRV in 1972 . Same with Russia
These are two separate technologies.
India doesn't have warheads of appropriate size and weight to MIRV them.
 
.
USA Put man on the moon in 1968 but had MIRV in 1972 . Same with Russia
These are two separate technologies.
India doesn't have warheads of appropriate size and weight to MIRV them.

Beat India easily beat Pakistan when it comes to bragging about MIRV.
 
.
USA Put man on the moon in 1968 but had MIRV in 1972 . Same with Russia
These are two separate technologies.
India doesn't have warheads of appropriate size and weight to MIRV them.
Moon mission was priority for US and got far more investment than MIRV programs as moon landings would signal final victory in Space Race.

As for warheads we have 200 kt warheads which us much more powerful than anything Pakistan has.

Pakistani Shaheen and Ababeel are not even canisterized, so obsolete.
 
.
We accept we are Behind Pakistan in Projectile Technology.

GSLV, PSLV, SLBMs, PAD are examples to Fluke(s) where projectile some how reaches Exosphere..

At end of a Day --- What is a Missile -- Just a Tube !!!!
 
.
We accept we are Behind Pakistan in Projectile Technology.

GSLV, PSLV, SLBMs, PAD are examples to Fluke(s) where projectile some how reaches Exosphere..

At end of a Day --- What is a Missile -- Just a Tube !!!!
Same as most Indians you mix Satellite launching capability with Missiles. Both are different
 
.
Same as most Indians you mix Satellite launching capability with Missiles. Both are different
Same concept.Rather satellites are launched at higher altitude..
Real MIRV capable missiles are basically ICBM.It needs the speed & altitude of ICBM,not MRBM..
You people have only tested the launcher & I am sure it can't carry more than two warheads which is very low..Russians or US can place around 10 warheads in a single missile..
 
.
Same concept.Rather satellites are launched at higher altitude..
Real MIRV capable missiles are basically ICBM.It needs the speed & altitude of ICBM,not MRBM..
You people have only tested the launcher & I am sure it can't carry more than two warheads which is very low..Russians or US can place around 10 warheads in a single missile..
Size and time are keywords here.
You can have as big a rocket you want for satellite launch but cannot have this luxury for missile which has to be compact.
Also you can have whole week or months to prepare for one rocket launch. But missile has to be able to launch on minutes notice.
Hence very different technologies.
Ababeel carries 3 Shaheen-III size warheads.
 
.
Size and time are keywords here.
You can have as big a rocket you want for satellite launch but cannot have this luxury for missile which has to be compact.
Also you can have whole week or months to prepare for one rocket launch. But missile has to be able to launch on minutes notice.
Hence very different technologies.
Ababeel carries 3 Shaheen-III size warheads.
Ababeel has not carried any sort of MIRVs in its test.
 
.
Same concept.Rather satellites are launched at higher altitude..
Real MIRV capable missiles are basically ICBM.It needs the speed & altitude of ICBM,not MRBM..
You people have only tested the launcher & I am sure it can't carry more than two warheads which is very low..Russians or US can place around 10 warheads in a single missile..
And India is not at war with either of two.. USA or Russia... Why u ppl brag about others achievement well than yours.. I think India is also the other country than yours... So apply the same formula just batch about yours n not others. As u dont know the "nukra" about others. By just dreaming
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom