jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
I saw that you had strong military background. But I do not directly see how that is correlated to your understanding of physics in many of your postings. Actually, what you had posted is that strong knowledge in military intelligence does not correlate to strength in knowledge of science.
How about I minored applied physics? And I have offered a PhD Studies with computer science? I don't want to say that because it feel like I have been using my academic background to outrank you.
You have to come from Physics and Mathematics background to get in the Military Intelligence field, because a lot of their work are either EM related (Such as EMCON or ISSM/SIGNIT) or encryption/decryption related. You cannot be consider to be in the Military Intelligence branch if you are not good in Physics or Mathematics or both.
So, to answer your question, you have to be good in science otherwise you will have a hard time graduating from AIC, that is if you get in AIC in the first place at all.
I do see lots of mudslings between you and the other members who pointed out your misstatements of facts. Such as general relatively cover the science of quantum mechanics. I know that this is patently false. Please at least read up on Wikipedia on what are going to post next time because it shows your lack of basic understanding of physics.
I don't see how the other person have a high level of education to begin with, let alone in the field of physics. And you know what? So do you.
I did not see him explain why a missile can travel in High G turn when the graph he supplied did not even have enough variable to calculate the actual value. On the other hand, my brother is a Mechanical Engineer and work with Boeing, even he said Missile cannot proceed with a High G turn without because the structural strength of a missile cannot endure it. Yet, he claim it can do it without provide facts or how.
I am not interested in yours, his, or anyone background, you can be a Wikipedia nerd and with no educational background, as long as you try to argue with me in detail with creditable evidence. But he is not actually doing that.
If you can provide creditable reference and said I am wrong, I am more than happy to look at it and if I was indeed wrong, I will admit I am wrong.
Also, a lot of his comment is unattainable militarily. Such as he claim China can use Merchant Navy and supplies the whole fleet all the way to France without any port call along the way, which is not doable because normal commercial shipping does not design with underway replenishment at sea. Nor was he even understand the meaning of replenishment. He also did not understand missile limitation and the warfighting technique, nor how ISTAR delay can affect DF-series missile accuracy.
Yet, he still think all his point in the aforementioned military related topic is correct and I am wrong, even tho if you have any remote military experience in any given branch on any military service, you would probably laugh out loud on his answer right the way.
He also failed at general aviation knowledge, as @gambit pointed out.
LOL. Doesnt require guts to bust you anywhere
As I told you: go ahead, you can repost your funy physics, and your nonsense opinion regarding missiles etc that we are debating here, then invite me to join; we'll see the outcome.
LOL. Dream on... as the matter of fact I F you up here till your credibility and dignity stripped away, and you've become laughing stock.
I hope you still can focus on your work, as I know feeling of defeat is uneasy while the shame is unbearable.
Thank you for entertaining us ... and let me sleep a log ..
LOL. I did, you can search it on PDF and reply to me, I have written 27 articles that feature in this forum, it should not be hard to find, if you really have the guts to go against me, you would have done so already.
And again, you should really get your head check because if you think my creditability and dignity is stripped away, you are quite seriously mistaken. First of all, I did not see you as my peer, I see you as a kid, and you probably are. Secondly, I don't really care about what you think or you said to begin with.
And finally, the very fact that you cop the negative rating and I didn't, didn't that already suggesting I am more creditable than you? As I said, I have people all over these forum, most of them I don't even know, quote me and ask me for advice and my input, how many had asked you lately? I had one just 5 days ago.
Se Bastante Bien?
I am not going to reply to you on this thread anymore, as I said, you are my entertainment, I come F you upif and when I have time, if not, you are not that important to me to make fun of. And unlike you, I have a job so, adios.
Last edited: