I respect your knowledge in many defense and multicultural areas. But your disregard of facts when it comes to history of universe and cosmos is alarming. The last paragraph has many issues
“The universe itself is 13.799 ± 0.021 billion years old, and things according to the scientist have maintain the same order since the beginning of the universe. In this 13.799 ± 0.021 billion years, the earth continue to orbit the sun, and the moon continue to orbit the moon. Yes, human is just a speck of life in the universe, but 13.799 ± 0.021 billion years is also a very long time, and either we argue with CURRENT physics or we are not going to argue at all if we are talking about time in infinity.”
First of all, the law of universe immediately after the Big Bang is different from the law of universe today. This is a topic that is not well known but we know to be different from our limited knowledge. This is because we cannot use today’s general physical law to explain the Big Bang. And that as humans, we need to know what we don’t know.
Problem is, there may or may not have changes since the big bang, some scientist even think big bang does not actually happens at all, or more prevailing was there actually anything before the big bang itself. There are many unknown toward the universe, past and future, it was estimated the universe is 19 billions years old before something called "hubble law" comes in, and suddenly, it become 14 billions old (and although 5 billions is not that big of a gap in time for the universe, it is big enough to start discussion in academic level world wide.)
One thing you get it right is that we do only know very little about the universe, problem is, if we are putting this banner up every time we discuss physics and universe, we cannot get anywhere because A.) There are little we know, B.) What we did know is very, very small portion of the actual sum of knowledge. Most scientist today would do is to discuss the prospect and until a counter case is proven, we continue with the current theory.
2ndly, I’m perplex that you state that earth have been orbiting the sun since the beginning of universe. When earth itself is around 4 billion years old. And the moon was even created in a later time. So it’s not a matter of how long our life has been vs the history of the cosmos if we can’t get the facts straight.
I did not say the sun orbit around the universe at day one. This is what I said
In this 13.799 ± 0.021 billion years, the earth continue to orbit the sun, and the moon continue to orbit the moon
That mean in this period of time, earth continue to orbit the sun, moon continue to orbit the moon( sic, which should have been earth)
So if I say "in this 38 years of my life, I keep working and money keep coming" does that mean I work since day 1 after I was born?
LOL...
Everyone have Wikipedia can search how old is the sun, do you think I did not do any research before I wrote?
3rdly, on how you and the other folks want to argue with current law of physics? The problem is that today’s physical laws are not complete enough to explain all we can observe. And we are falling further and further behind everyday until we have a break through in understanding. Furthermore, you seen to arguing within the bounds of Newton’s classical physical laws, when today’s general physical theory is Einstein’s law of general relativity. Which encompasses Newton’s laws and Special relativity. However, to debate physics, you need to know what you don’t know and also what the human race do not know. Otherwise, you should sticks with your combat experiences and your rich set of multicultural knowledge.
I do know between the difference between classical physics and relativity physics, and I did cover both, by the way, relativity physics not just encompass Newton ideology and Einstein's Relativity, but also very importantly, quantum physics.
As I said before, I discuss physics in the current form, from what we (or I) know, again, if you have to play the "Our time is small" card, we may as well throw all the textbook away and forget all the principal. We shouldn't have a subject called "Physics" to discuss. It's the same when religious people discuss physics.
And I do have a very strong physics background, let me give you a hint, I was in intelligence business, and to enter that MOS, you need a strong physics and mechanical background to get into that MOS. If you still don't catch the drift, go watch the imitation game and see what kind of background those people had?