What's new

The fate of the PNS Ghazi

seriously if you cant accept the fact the 1971 was an outright defeat for Pakistan from all sides then your living in a dream world. In regards to Ghazi, the incident will forever be a mystery as no one can confirm what really happened.


One needs to learn from History.

Biggest lesson of History is that no one learns from History.

Pakistan though defeat but still not only flourishing but is a formidable nuclear power.

Our defeat came from within at that time as Bengalis were rightly demanding independence and corrupt politicians helped India to defeat Pakistan.

All 3 characters, Mujeeb, Bhutto and Indra had been eliminated by their own people - this is revenge of nature.
 
. . .
Thats the most funniest thing i have ever heard for a while on PDF. Used as a decoy for the Pakistani submarine. :lol: :rofl:

Webmaster, Its not funny. Reports indicate that INS Rajput was indeed used as a decoy to cover up INS vikrant.

Krishnan did everything to let the enemy believe that the Vikrant was still in Vizag. He summoned Lt-Commander Inder Singh, the captain of INS Rajput, an ageing destroyer which was being sent to Vizag to be decommissioned. The wily Krishnan gave it and Inder Singh one last mission-the Rajput was to pretend to be the Vikrant, sail 160 miles out of Vizag harbour and generate heavy wireless traffic-which would lead the enemy to believe there was a large ship in the vicinity. He then falsely informed naval authorities in Madras that the carrier would be arriving there shortly. In Vizag, he began ordering huge quantities of rations-meat and vegetables-which indicated that the fleet was in harbour. He hoped that spies in the city would pick up and transmit this intelligence.

The bait was snapped up. On November 26, 1971, the Ghazi's wireless room crackled with a terse message from the commodore, submarines: "Occupy Zone Victor with all despatch. Intelligence indicates carrier in port." Khan altered course and sped his submarine north. Zone Victor was Vizag. Reaching Vizag on November 27, the mechanical predator prowled perilously close to the Indian coast, looking for its quarry.
 
. .
kfzsSbaejag.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
The truth behind the Navy's 'sinking' of Ghazi

2010-05-25 19:09:29
Last Updated: 2010-05-26 10:24:29

kfzsSbaejag.jpg

Lt General JFR Jacob, (retd), hero of the 1971 India Pakistan war, explains why the Indian Navy destroyed documents related to the sinking of the Pakistani submarine, PNS Ghazi.

Earlier this month, there were reports that all documents connected with the sinking of the Pakistani submarine PNS Ghazi during the 1971 war had been destroyed by the Indian Navy.

It is not difficult to conjecture the reasons why.

Back in November 1971, our signal intercept units had been monitoring the movements of the Ghazi on her entering the Bay of Bengal. The last intercept we got from the Ghazi was on 27 November. We had been passing on all intercepts to the Navy.

PNS Ghazi blew up due to an internal explosion while laying mines off the port of Vishakapatnam, probably at the end of November or the beginning of December 1971.On December 3, I received a call from Vice Admiral Krishnan, Commander of the Eastern Naval Command, who said that fishermen had found some floating wreckage, and that he had gone to the site where the wreckage was found.

Among the debris was a lifebelt with 'Diablo' printed on it. Diablo was the name of the United States Navy submarine that was transferred to the Pakistan Navy and renamed Ghazi.

Krishnan said he had no doubt that the wreckage was that of the Ghazi and that the sinking of the Ghazi was an act of God. He stated that the Navy was unaware that the Ghazi had sunk. He had rewarded the fishermen who had found the wreckage. I told him that there was no threat now to the aircraft carrier INS Vikrant, which had been the prime target of the Ghazi.

On the morning of December 4, Krishnan again called me, asking if I had sent a report on the Ghazi. I replied in the negative, saying that as it was a naval matter, I had presumed that he had done so. He seemed relieved and told me that I should forget our conversation of the previous day and that he was in discussions with the Navy chief, Admiral SM Nanda, in Delhi.

On December 9, the Navy announced that they had sunk the Ghazi on December 4, after the start of the war. Later, officers were decorated for their role and the offensive action of their ships in the sinking of the Ghazi.

After the war, however, teams of divers confirmed that it was an internal explosion that sank the Ghazi. The log of the Ghazi was recovered and the last entry as far as I can recall was on November 29, 1971. Sadly, that too has been destroyed.

The Navy had earlier decided to change the date of Navy Day to December 4, the day they had proclaimed that they had sunk the Ghazi.

But I had spoken to the press regarding the sinking of the Ghazi and later published my conversations with Vice Admiral Krishnan in my book 'Surrender at Dacca' in 1997. The Navy then realised that they could no longer maintain their claims to have sunk the Ghazi on December 4.

The Navy then went on to state that December 4, the new date for Navy Day, marked the start of the war. For the record, the war started on December 3 at 1800 hours, when Pakistan bombed our airfields.

As the old saying goes, truth is the first casualty in war.
 
.
Ussdiablo.jpg


Could it be possible that Russian's had anything to do with the sinking of the Ghazi? I found this clip below from Youtube and thought... could this be possible?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
New Bollywood movie aims to unravel the truth about the submarine


Whatever be the truth - Indian version or Pakistani a salute goes out to the souls of 93 brave men who laid down their lives fighting for their country. Even if they are the enemy we have to respect them
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom