The court declared legal actions taken by the FBR and all other forums related to the assets of Justice Isa's wife and children as illegal

[ghazi52]

 

[TheSnakeEatingMarkhur]

The Supreme Court on Monday accepted Justice Qazi Faez Isa's review petitions challenging the court's judgement on the presidential reference against him.

A 10-member bench, headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial, was hearing review petitions filed against the court’s June 19, 2020, judgement on the presidential reference in which the court had empowered the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to conduct an inquiry into offshore assets of his spouse.

The top court accepted the review petitions by a majority of 6-4. Justice Maqbool Baqar, Justice Manzoor Ahmad Malik, Justice Aminuddin Khan, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Mazhar Alam accepted the petitions.

Meanwhile, Justice Bandial, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin and Justice Sajjad Ali Shah dissented from the judgement.

The court declared legal actions taken by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) and all other forums related to the assets of Justice Isa's wife and children as "illegal".

The FBR's report could not be challenged in the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) or any other legal forum, the majority judgement said.

On April 13, the apex court had dismissed the judge's application seeking live telecast of the proceedings on his review petition against the verdict in presidential reference case.

The application was dismissed by a 6-4 majority of a larger bench of 10 judges headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial. Justice Maqbool Baqar, Justice Manzoor Ahmad Malik, Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel and Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah dissented from the majority judgement. They were of the opinion that the SC registrar should take measures for live streaming of the matters of public interest.

During today's hearing, Justice Isa alleged that new evidence was being made part of the proceedings.

Sarina Isa said that Justice Bandial and Justice Akhtar were making efforts for accountability which was why they should make their assets and the assets of their wives public.

Counsel for the federal government Amir Rehman said that the actions of the Supreme Judicial Council could not be challenged nor could it be stopped from scrutinising any evidence. "The Supreme Court can only interfere in the council under extraordinary conditions."

Justice Baqar questioned whether it would affect the Supreme Judicial Council if the top court's judges gave their observations on the FBR report.

Rehman replied that the Supreme Court had the right to ask questions according to rules. "The court can also ask for statements to be recorded to ascertain facts. The foundation of the case is three questions."


Presidential reference

Justice Isa was the subject of a presidential reference that alleged he had acquired three properties in London on lease in the name of his wife and children between 2011 and 2015 but did not disclose them in his wealth returns. Justice Isa contested the allegation, saying he was not a beneficial owner of the flats — either directly or indirectly.

In June 2020, the Supreme Court threw out the reference, terming it "invalid".

"[The reference] is declared to be of no legal effect whatsoever and stands quashed," read the majority (9-1) short verdict on a petition filed by Justice Isa and others seeking the reference's dismissal.

However, seven of the 10 judges on the bench hearing the case ordered the Inland Revenue Department and the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to seek explanations from the judge's wife and children on the nature and source of funding for three properties in their names in the United Kingdom and submit a report to the SC registrar.

Justice Isa then approached the apex court, seeking a review of the decision. Bar associations, including the Sindh High Court Bar Association, also filed similar petitions.

A seven-judge bench was constituted by the SC to hear the petitions but four premier bar associations of the country challenged it in a joint one-page application and requested that the matter be placed before the CJP to form a larger bench comprising all the judges who had decided the constitutional petitions against the filing of the reference.

On Feb 24, a 10-judge bench was constituted to hear the set of review petitions.

SC accepts review petitions in Justice Isa presidential reference verdict

Top court declares legal actions taken by the FBR and all other forums as "illegal".

www.dawn.com

The man everytime asked where did he get properties went on a routine trashing of Imran Khan and Generals... now he is free.. without proving how he got the properties... no money trail.. nada as far as I know.. Justice System of Pakistan is a "Londi" of the the powerful

 

[ghazi52]

بگ بریکنگ ۔ سپریم کورٹ میں بازی پلٹ گئی۔ جیت کا فیصلہ ہو گیا۔


قوم کو مبارک ہو ۔۔۔۔۔ پاکستانی انصاف ایک دفعہ پھر جیت گیا۔۔۔۔ انا للہ وانا الیہ راجعون




Ch Sohail
6 hours ago

Hor chupo
Pata nee kyon etbar tha insaf ka
Clean chit deni thi us ke liye sab drama chalta raha

 

[Sugarcane]

Do you guys really expected jokers running circus will deliver justice?

 

[ghazi52]

What to speak of our Rotten and Corrupt Judicial System...............................

 

[IceCold]

Judges are above accountability, politicans are above accountability, army is above accountability, only we the ordinary people are held accountable for even the smallest of things. RIP justice.

 

[PakFactor]

There is a reckoning for a nation that can't maintain it's justice system and impartiality.

 

[ghazi52]

Judges are above accountability, politicans are above accountability, army is above accountability, only we the ordinary people are held accountable for even the smallest of things. RIP justice.

True.

RIP Justice................................

 

[Sal12]

IK should come forward and talk openly against these judges even if this cost his Govt. He can start this by making the FBR report public.

 

[Chakar The Great]

Excellent decision.

 

[airmarshal]

The Supreme Court of Pakistan is a joke. How it has fallen on its face!

The Supreme Judicial Council dismssed Presidential reference on technical grounds. The Supreme Court dismissed the case against the Judge on technical grounds. It was SC which asked FBR to investigate the case and now its findings are illegal.

Judge Isa will be Chief Justice in 2023. Once he's there, he will benefit all the crooks against whom corruption cases are lingering. This is a victory for the thieves of Pakistan.

Its true that when you have judges, why bother hiring lawyers!

 

[Bilal.]

Dirty filthy depraved old men feeding on the carcass of justice like maggots.

 

[Norwegian]

It was SC which asked FBR to investigate the case and now its findings are illegal.

We laugh at politicians taking U turn. In Pakistan we have SC judges taking U turn in their written judgements. Pizza Republic

This is a victory for the thieves of Pakistan.

Indeed. They are not even hiding it. It's time to leave Pakistan for those that can.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1386739631115448329

Its true that when you have judges, why bother hiring lawyers!

Now there is no need to punish anyone for corruption. All those convicted for corruption can now be released. All thanks to this landmark judgement.

 

[koolio]

I wonder if a new reference will be filed by the president since more evidence has been furnished?

 

[ghazi52]

The Supreme Court of Pakistan is a joke. How it has fallen on its face!

Its true that when you have judges, why bother hiring lawyers!

Perfectly stated.....