The Battle of 'Ain Jalut | Mamluks vs. Mongols

[retaxis]

That was only when Mongol control finished

But it finished because the Mongols became Muslims

They were downhill after China slayed Mongke Grand Khan. All the mongols and their princes called back majority of their forces back to Mongolia for Kurralti and the rest of the world got a breather and set up defenses and took opportunities like Ain Jalut. Besides Kublai Khan who pushed on with Northern Chinese troops as the vanguard, the rest of the mongols didn't achieve much after Mongke was slain

 

[Maira La]

By the way 'Ain Jalut was not the first Muslim victory against the Mongols.
The first time Muslims defeated Mongols was at the Battle of Parwan, in Genghis Khan's time.
However the victorious Muslim army soon disintegrated due to infighting.

 

[MMM-E]

Arabs were in their way and stop them. Arabs save world of mongol domination.

Not Arabs ,,, but Kipchak TURKS led by Sultan BAIBARS beat Mongols

 

[K_Bin_W]

Wherever they stayed, they were tiny minority and converted/assimilated in the region. Whether it was Russia/China/Korea/Middle East etc.

Mongols converted to Islam wholesale while they were still an empire and a formidable power.

The Impact of Mongol Invasion on the Muslim World and the Political, Economic and Social Ramifications

The Mongol invasion of the Muslim world began in 1217 and continued upto 1305. The Mongols, after conquering north and east Iran, eventually embraced Islam as t

papers.ssrn.com

 

[ReasonableStar75]

Not Arabs ,,, but Kipchak TURKS led by Sultan BAIBARS beat Mongols

They were mamluks, or better called arabs, western invent terms for not recognizing arab victories for the sake of Israel, if not israeli would cry like baby,

and LOL, please you turks were absolute losers with mongols in every fight, you surrender literally.

Arabs from egypt and yemen and arabia saved europe and turks from extinction. Mongols from that time were murderer savages.

 

[MMM-E]

They were mamluks, or better called arabs,

Incorrect History...


MAMLUKS were Kipchak Turks including SULTAN BAIBARS who defeated Mongols and Crusades


BAIBARS KHAN was Turkic origin Sultan of Egypt in the Mamluk Bahri dynasty

He led the vanguard of the Turkic MAMLUK forces at the Battle of Ain Jalut in 1260 which marked the first substantial defeat of the Mongol army and is considered a turning point in history


Also He was Commander of the Turkic MAMLUK forces that inflicted a defeat on the 7th Crusade of King Louis IX of France

Arabs from egypt and yemen and arabia saved europe and turks from extinction. Mongols from that time were murderer savages.

Kipchak Turks led by Sultan BAIBARS stopped Mongols

 

[waz]

That was the ilkhanate and not what the original Mongols were. The best mongol soldiers had all died/retired by then and the mongol army were filled with Turks/slaves of other conquered nations. The Ilkhanate was a small weak power compared to the other Mongol powers and defeating Ilkhanate is not the same as defeating Yuan Dynasty Mongols or Tamerlane

No this was not the case. The bulk of the army was ethnic Mongol as the battle was fought in 1281 and it wasn't until the 1290 till you saw dilution of the Mongol forces. You can't lose a generation of Mongols in a few years. Möngke was Hulagu's son.

Stop fabricate fake History


MAMLUKS were Kipchak Turks including SULTAN BAIBARS who defeated Mongols and Crusades


BAIBARS KHAN was Turkic origin Sultan of Egypt in the Mamluk Bahri dynasty

He led the vanguard of the Turkic MAMLUK forces at the Battle of Ain Jalut in 1260 which marked the first substantial defeat of the Mongol army and is considered a turning point in history


Also He was Commander of the Turkic MAMLUK forces that inflicted a defeat on the 7th Crusade of King Louis IX of France





Kipchak Turks led by Sultan BAIBARS stopped Mongols

This is 100% solid fact. The Malmluks by sheer majority were Turkic with Kipchak Turks making up a large host.
Look at their fighting style of hit and run which came from the Steppe and negated the Mongol style. When the Malmluks engaged the Mongols with swords and maces they slaughtered them, as Malmluk boys from birth learnt to master the sword and spear.

 

[retaxis]

No this was not the case. The bulk of the army was ethnic Mongol as the battle was fought in 1281 and it wasn't until the 1290 till you saw dilution of the Mongol forces. You can't lose a generation of Mongols in a few years. Möngke was Hulagu's son.



This is 100% solid fact. The Malmluks by sheer majority were Turkic with Kipchak Turks making up a large host.
Look at their fighting style of hit and run which came from the Steppe and negated the Mongol style. When the Malmluks engaged the Mongols with swords and maces they slaughtered them, as Malmluk boys from birth learnt to master the sword and spear.

You got Mongke Supreme Khan mixed up with Mongke Temur son of Hulagu who was born decades after Mongke supreme leader

Mongke Khan (leader whose death caused Kurultai) died in 1259 in China (killed) and born in 1209

Mongke Temur was only born in 1256.

Siege of Baghdad was 1258 by 1280s those Mongol soldiers who fought in the big surge are all dead or retired (remember life span wasn't that long back then either) and majority of forces are captured/indentured slaves of Turkic/Central Asian/Middle Eastern stock. Biggest concentration of pure Mongol forces were in the Yuan Dynasty where the supreme leader Kublai Khan resided.

completely different people and yes it was generations btw.