Pakistan State and the Army is directly involved in war against its own Muslim citizens, even though it is under a quasi-agreement with the USA.
These so called Pakistani 'citizens' (and that too not all of them) are breaking Rule Number 1. The situation we face today is not exactly like 'Sulah Hudeibiyah'. It is a milder version but obviously the Sulah does establish a precedent as far as these aspects of Islamic statehood go. As I'm sure you know, the Sulah had called for the immediate extradition of Muslims seeking asylum in the new born Islamic state back to the Kuffar (where they would most likely be tortured and put to death) and the Holy Prophet (PBUH) agreed because he in all his wisdom knew that allegiance to Islam must not be used as an excuse to bypass stately agreements. In Pakistan's case however, all the Americans have asked for in exchange of an alliance is that we keep our territory from being utilized to make violence against them. It is the honorable thing to do since (despite what else the US has done in the world) the vast majority of Pakistanis don't want war with the US.
These 'citizens' can choose to live in peace in Pakistan, or they can choose to leave if they insist on war with the US. Both these choices have been open for a very long time and probably still are. However they not only choose to stay and exploit the safety our sovereignty can provide them against the wishes of the majority and the state, they make brutal war on those who rightly seek to bring them to account and furthermore they impose themselves and their wishes on us and our people?
You obviously have nothing but contempt for the Pakistani state Anwar2 because you feel they are not 'Islamic' enough for your standards. But why then, may I ask, are you so hell bent on making an exception for these people, this scum of the Muslim World when they have no basis in terms of credibility, legitimacy, authority as far as Islamic or International Law is concerned?
I'll answer that question for you. Because you have no standards. Pakistani Army does have the legitimacy and authority to dispose of these people, nay they have the responsibility. Islam gives them that. NO ONE has immunity to Law just because they are Muslim or claim to be. If you were really for Islam, if you'd really wish for an Islamic agenda in Pakistan where would you start? You'd start by tackling this abomination, this stain to the face of every Muslim. For where, I ask you, is any thing that TTP or Al-Qaeda done even remotely Islamic? If you'd care for an Islamic Pakistan, thats where you or Qazi Hussain would start from. You'd speak against these people just as venomously as you do against the PA or the US. But you don't. Because you're a hypocrite, your standards are hypocritical. Pakistan is not Islamic enough for you? Well I say you're not Islamic enough for Pakistan. Something else dictates your agenda and that of people like Qazi, something much more primitive, and it is certainly not Islam.
But please note that Hazrat Imam Hussein sacrificed his life to uphold Islamic values against the then “legitimate” Islamic government of Yazeed.
I am disgusted with you. How dare you even think about comparing Hazrat Imam Hussein to the likes of Betullah Mehsud or Ghazi of Lal Masjhid. Is this what you think? Is this how lowly your view is of our great Islamic figures? Despite what Hazrat Imam Hussein was and despite what Yazeed was, the Imam still did not try to declare Jihad or instigate rebellion against him. Because the Imam in his wisdom knew Yazeed would get what he deserved in time. The people who you support are more akin to those who murdered Hazrat Usman, no they are even worse. They thrive in chaos and confusion, in faithlessness and hate. They are not, I repeat NOT characters of Hazrat Imram Hussein's calibre. And history will not think of them as such, but history will curse us if we allow them free reign and allow them to dictate and decide the course of our children's lives and or country's future.
Incidentally having a US citizen US educated son does not matter in the context of Qazi’s views on US operations on Afghanistan or FATA.
But they are very much relevant to the Qazi view of the west and of American influence in particular. If you'd ask him, he'd tell you that alliance, understanding, respect with a power like the US is wrong, immoral and un-Islamic. Because the US has the blood of Muslims on it's hands. He will tell you those Muslims who still think they can be reasoned with, trusted, listened to are disillusioned or cowardly or not Muslims. He says an alliance with the US in immoral, period. But should we not ask him about his son who pays taxes to the very US government which is the enemy of God in his view? Stately relationships with them are unacceptable according to him so therefore Pakistan in doing so is cursed, ridiculed, called labeled un-Islamic. But what about his sons who went there seeking a better life? A better education? In a 'society full of evil'? Isn't that a bit odd to say the least? Yes, more than that it is hypocritical. People like the Qazi only play at the people's fear, the poor uneducated people, telling them what they want to hear. Islam or any ideal or belief has nothing to do with it, only his popularity and power is of consequence. So what if the nation's prestige suffers, so what if he is encouraging/justifying very much un-Islamic, un-Islamicly-authorized or justified violence? He is primitive, so are his ideals, and he is NOT Islamic. These hypocrites have been the end of Islam the way it was meant to be. My country is suffering and aye my religion is suffering because of people like him. People like you Anwar2.
