M. Sarmad
SENIOR MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/Lt.General.jpg)
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2013
- Messages
- 7,022
- Reaction score
- 62
- Country
- Location
hmm... India is a signatory to the UNSC resolutions on kashmir, thus has been in agreement since the resolution was signed and with every subsequent resolutions. If india was in disagreement there would be no resolution.
Here is the resolution (resolution 98)
"4. Urges the Governments of India and Pakistan to enter into immediate negotiations under the auspices of the United Nations Representative for India and Pakistan in order to reach agreement on the specific number of forces to remain on each side of the cease-fire line at the end of the period of demilitarization, this number to be between 3,000 and 6,000 armed forces remaining on the Pakistan side of the cease-fire line and between 12,000 and 18,000 armed forces remaining on the India side of the cease-fire line, as suggested by the United Nations Representative in his proposals of 16 July 1952, such specific numbers to be arrived at bearing in mind the principles or criteria contained in paragraph 7 of the United Nations Representative's proposal of 4 September 1952;"
....... However, India refused to reduce its troop number down to 18,000. It claimed it needed 24,000 troops. Pakistan had already agreed to reduce its troop numbers to 3,000-6,000. This is what halted the process......
Sino-Pakistan Frontier Agreement - 1963 | Page 3
Last edited: