What's new

Tata Motors drives into Indonesia

The sheer ignorance of people trying to put down the Nano/Tata shows that all they have is pure hate going on here. Name me one car company that does not have recall issues...

On the other hand -when you don't make jack in your country- it is easy to fall back to " let's bring them down to our level" syndrome.
 
.
Guys ...but you gotto give it to the chinese......they have better finish than the indian models ................


So finish is more important than safety. It will sell some models at first, but eventually customers will realize their folly. Same happened to China mobiles in India.

The sheer ignorance of people trying to put down the Nano/Tata shows that all they have is pure hate going on here. Name me one car company that does not have recall issues...

On the other hand -when you don't make jack in your country- it is easy to fall back to " let's bring them down to our level" syndrome.

I haerd GM recalled thousands of vehicles for some gear shift problem.
 
.
I haerd GM recalled thousands of vehicles for some gear shift problem.

Everyone of the car companies have issues even when they in way advance stages of car manufacturing over the first pass Nano from TATA. That includes brakes failing, catching on fire etc...
 
.
Nano was designed for families on a motorbike. I personally thought it was a sure shot.
How much more the Nano is from an average family motorbike?

I am really surprised that Nano is not doing well.
 
.
Nano was designed for families on a motorbike. I personally thought it was a sure shot.
How much more the Nano is from an average family motorbike?

I am really surprised that Nano is not doing well.

Not well according to TATA's expectation. They sold 176,000 Nanos from March 2009 to April 2012..thats around 160 cars per day. Name any car model that can compare with this figure.
 
. .
I know of export to Srilanka and there is model for Europe too, any export to Africa and other countries ?

Nano was designed for families on a motorbike. I personally thought it was a sure shot.
How much more the Nano is from an average family motorbike?

I am really surprised that Nano is not doing well.
Cost of petrol also is major factor. Motorbikes give more than twice the average.
 
. .
So Cheap quality tata cars on Indonesia ?
I dont think Indonesian people will waste their money on this kinda cheap car
 
.
So Cheap quality tata cars on Indonesia ?
I dont think Indonesian people will waste their money on this kinda cheap car

I don't think you understand. Please understand, then think.

TATA, first of all, is not a cheap company..... please tell me how it has cheap quality cars? You must be kidding right?

And no need to underline... as if you got a very important thing to tell. It's just 2 lines of hate and ignorance.
 
. .
So Cheap quality tata cars on Indonesia ?
I dont think Indonesian people will waste their money on this kinda cheap car

now lets leave that do Indonesians after all its their choice whether they want these cars or not, let the market decide

Secondly, plz go n educate urself a bit do u even have any idea what variety of cars r offered by Tata group
u might be surprised but Tata groups market cap is almost equivalent to BD's GDP:blink:

Tata group - $100.03 billion(2011)
BD GDP(Nominal) - 113.03 billion(2011)

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/tata-group-market-wealth-crosses-100bn-mark/164227-7.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh
 
. .
What a shame. I hope our Indonesian brothers come to their senses, expel these Indian trinkets
I see a lot of a$$es on fire here! I think we need to call the fire department to douse the flames, pronto.
:pop:

And needless to say, grapes are sour! Some wogs just can't bear to see India's rapid advance into international markets. Instead of bluster and baloney, they instead should take a leaf out of India's books and try to compete rather than spewing clap-trap. But old habits die hard as can be seen in their utter frustration, since their countries neither have the capabilities nor the inclination to progress!

Chak de India!! :tup:
flag28.gif
 
.
now lets leave that do Indonesians after all its their choice whether they want these cars or not, let the market decide

Secondly, plz go n educate urself a bit do u even have any idea what variety of cars r offered by Tata group
u might be surprised but Tata groups market cap is almost equivalent to BD's GDP:blink:

Tata group - $100.03 billion(2011)
BD GDP(Nominal) - 113.03 billion(2011)

Tata group market wealth crosses $100-bn mark - Business News - IBNLive

Bangladesh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
GDP For a Country is Not the Same Thing as Turnover for a Business


I’m afraid that our friends over at Business Insider have made one of the more common mistakes when trying to compare businesses and companies. Exxon’s revenues are about the same as Thailand’s GDP, therefore Exxon is about the same size as Thailand, right?

No, entirely wrong. It’s true that Thailand’s GDP is about the same as Exxon’s revenues, yes, but the implication that this makes the two organisations the same size is entirely wrong.

Some boring explication: GDP is the “value of goods and services” produced in that country in that year. Yes, we can play with the definitions a little bit but it is very much NOT the turnover in that country. It is the value added through economic activity. One example should suffice: the turnover of the foreign exchange markets in London each day is some $1.5 trillion dollars. There are some 250 such trading days in the year. However, the GDP of the entire UK, let alone London, is only around £1.4 trillion a year. Yes, there’s a difference in value between $ and £ but not that much: so clearly, we’re not counting the turnover in our calculation of GDP. What we’re in fact counting as part of GDP is the value added in this process. The 0.005% on each deal that goes in commissions and margins to the traders- yes, again, it becomes more complex but that’s the basis upon which we’re working.

Revenues for a company are of course turnover: so we cannot compare turnover to GDP. What we actually want to compare is the value added. So, what is the value added of a company? One definition is the profit made by the company. Other theoreticians say we should add the profit and the wages paid out by the company together and this gives us the total value added.

So, with the Worstall Calculator (back of envelope, 1, pencil, 1) let us see what we might be able to work out as Exxon’s comparable country. Profits are around $30 billion. 200,000 employees or so, all presumably on pretty good wages. Let’s just guess at $50,000 a year (this is why they’re called back of the envelope calculations). So that’s another $10 billion to add on top. So Exxon’s value added for the year is around $40 billion.

So, which country has a GDP roughly comparable to Exxon’s value added? Err, how about Luxembourg, at $52 billion? And we’ll go back and raise the average wages at Exxon to $100,000 a year so that Exxon’s value added is $50 billion.

But hey, this is still remarkable, right, that a simple company has the same value added as an entire country! Yes? Amazing or what?

Well, no, not really, for Luxembourg has a population of some 400,000. Economic participation rates generally run about 50% of the population (those “economically active” numbers you see more generally of 65 to 70%, are for those of working age. So adjust for kiddies and pensioners) so, in our very sketchy and now crowded back of the envelope we’ve got a labour force of 200,000 people.

Which is the same as Exxon’s labour force of 200,000 people.

So now our statement is that 200,000 people working away seem to produce the same added value as 200,000 people working away. We can be more specific: 200,000 rich world people add the same value as 200,000 rich world people.

Which, when you come to think about it, isn’t remarkable at all. For the very definition of being a rich world person is that you’ve got a high value add to your labour, a value add on average across the group which is not all that far away from other rich world people. If all the people of Luxembourg had low value add to their labour then Luxembourg wouldn’t be a rich world country, it would be a poor world country.

So Exxon being the same size as Luxembourg isn’t in fact all that surprising. It’s rather built into the very basics of what produces wealth in fact.
GDP For a Country is Not the Same Thing as Turnover for a Business - Forbes

and Tata Group Profit is only US$ 5.8 billion (2010-11)
Tata Group - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and Bangladesh GDP is $113 billion

dont insult your intelligence by this kinda ignorance comment
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom