they are in spain already. TATA Motors EspañaIf TATA ever goes to Spanish speaking countries, they are going to have to change their name, it means something very different in Spanish...
Tata Motors drives into Indonesia
- Thread starter illusion8
- Start date
TheJewverine
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
- Messages
- 902
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
First model is an econo car called the "Titty Vista" (literal translation) This is a car I can get behind...
hahh, I'd take it most guys wont mind having a TT vistaFirst model is an econo car called the "Titty Vista" (literal translation) This is a car I can get behind...
btw you need to be at the front to enjoy the view, just sayin'
TheJewverine
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
- Messages
- 902
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
hahh, I'd take it most guys wont mind having a TT vista
btw you need to be at the front to enjoy the view, just sayin'
Lenin
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2012
- Messages
- 165
- Reaction score
- 0
Why only UK market?And besides, it's a small country and their economy is not very good at the moment.
Focus on China
Tata Motors plans to grow with Chinese demand for Jaguar Land Rover
If the article is from forbes.com doesn't mean it got be 100% correct
The writer is has clearly neglected various aspects of calculating GDP
there r basically 2 approaches for GDP calculation-
1. Expenditure approach
2. Income approach
He has just concentrated on only some parts of Income Approach that to which r used to calculate National Income n GDP is a much wider term
National Income (NI) = W + R + i + PR
Here,
W= wages
R= rental income
I= interest income
PR= Profit
Whereas GDP = NI + Indirect Business Taxes + Depreciation
This clearly shows that didn't even completed National Income defination when he first suggested that for company GDP(value added in his terms) is Profit.
What about other things like Indirect Taxes n Depriciation arn't they applicable to companies????
this clearly shows how flawed his assumptions r n i haven't even mentioned about the details of Expenditure method which will literally blow his net profit approach apart....
As far as his Market trading being similar to turnover assumption is concerned i have clearly shown its nulity through my example in my previous post
Although i agree that the turnover of company n the GDP of a country r not exactly the same thing but they r definitely comparable to quite extent n r not polls apart as suggested by the writer
Anyways i won't go into further details as i know no matter how logically i'll try to debate u'll never accept my point just for the sake of ur ego....
