What's new

Tarek Fatah - India without SINDH, SINDHU is not INDIA

Carrying a historical name that is not consistent with historical fact is not unique to India. As I mentioned before we have Romania, a country in present day Europe that carries a name similiar to the ancient Roman Empire whose successor state today is Italy. However what is unique about Indian's is they have become delusional. The Romanian's don't claim Rome just because of their name.


KE0iouC.png



All we need now is Black West Indians, Indiana state in USA, Indonesians to begin laying claims "we woz Mohajo Daro" and we can open a full mental asylum.
 
.
what the ****.. when did indus civilization become india.. and what happen to hindustan and its Ganges civilization.
Who cares what pakistani scientists say ?
Newton's law will be Newton's law .
 
.
LOL at rapist Hindus wanting to be Indus civilization. What a joke.

It is a good thing the partition happened. The Indians will never recover from this pain.
 
. . . . .
. . .
LOL Another random Tweet by some desperate Indian pretending to be us. You Indians got nothing in common with Indus. Just stop acting like you belong to the fold.
Read the news articles embedded with those above tweets .
 
. .
And ask these Gangadeshi's if their claim is based on this 'Hindoo myth' then why are they not also claiming as India -

Nepal - More Hindu then India. Has highest % Hindu in world.
Burma -
Thailand
Bali
etc

All these regions have or had significant Hindoo culture. Why do Gangadeshi's have this fetish only for Indus Pakistan? Because this is the cradle of civilization and these inferiority ridden aborginals want to latch on to this land so they can wobble thier heads in pride.
 
.
The Greeks never went to the Indian Republic.
Greeks come to the Indian Republic as tourists.
Throughout the ancient history, greeks, ME's, East Asians, all traded with India. Or conterminous India whichever you like to take.

And further they used the term Ἰνδία. So if you want to be factually true to history say "Ἰνδία" instead of the English transliteration that became current only in 1700s. Furthermore just because in 2018 you have a name used in history for the region on the Indus [which is coterminous to Pakistan] does not mean you are the same.
Apply your 'sore' logic in your own (former) country. Name your country Sindhu or Hindu, the river as Sindhu, a name given by the Indo-Aryans.

If you used Gangoo logic would it mean Romania is the successor state to Ancient Roman Empire? Just to clarify today Rome is called Italy and the name 'Rome' is restricted to the capital of that country.
Your logic applies when the river is called Indus as it originates and ends in Pakistan. It's a trans-national river and the river will never be confined to Pakistan. There's a lot of grey area when you associate it to Pakistan alone.

You do. Starkingly so. So much so that you don't even see the delusion your drowning in. A Indian living in Tamil Nadu walking around with thoughts that his ancestors had anything to do with Mohenjo Daro or Taxila, a land distant, a land alien to him, a land he never set foot is what exactly? Delusion on monumental scale.
Nothing to do with Todays Taxila or Mohenjo Daro as both regions were ruled over and tossed over by a lot of different rulers who have destroyed the purpose of Taxila (land of the great university). Those who inherited the property cannot claim they are sole owners of such rich culture while taking pride in ones who destroyed the same culture.

India inherited the culture Pakistan inherited part of the land. That's as far as your claim goes.

And who knows, as South Indians are really a mix of North Indians and South Indian groups. There is no particular identity to a Tamil Person other than his language whose ancestor may or may not be from Tamil Nadu.
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom