Indus Pakistan
BANNED
- Joined
- May 7, 2012
- Messages
- 20,487
- Reaction score
- 182
- Country
- Location
Seriously this guy suffers from schizophrenia. He has part grip on reality [some of what he says is solid fact] but then he goes full on delusional and spinns off into mad cow disease syndrome with his fantasy land. What a weird fcuked up guy. I would love to have live a debate with him in a neutral venue. Tear him a new a*sshole.
When he says "amputated in 1947" he forgets it was not India that was being amputated. It was the British Raj which was a creature spawned by British soldiers. The British Raj had been built by British soldiers through guns, swords and conquest of various peples of Asia. The only common thing they shared was they were British slaves. Being in same prison does not make you one people. As I have said many a time before 1947 was only undoing what the British did in 1843 and 1849 and the region coterminous to Pakistan was "make British Raj". I would request Pakistani;s to shove this infographic up a Gangoo's backside everytime they say "India was partitioned". 1947 was mere undoing of what British had done in 1840s.
When he says "amputated in 1947" he forgets it was not India that was being amputated. It was the British Raj which was a creature spawned by British soldiers. The British Raj had been built by British soldiers through guns, swords and conquest of various peples of Asia. The only common thing they shared was they were British slaves. Being in same prison does not make you one people. As I have said many a time before 1947 was only undoing what the British did in 1843 and 1849 and the region coterminous to Pakistan was "make British Raj". I would request Pakistani;s to shove this infographic up a Gangoo's backside everytime they say "India was partitioned". 1947 was mere undoing of what British had done in 1840s.
The Greeks never went to Indian Republic. And further they used the term Ἰνδία. So if you want to be factually true to history say "Ἰνδία" instead of the English transliteration that became current only in 1700s. Furthermore just because in 2018 you have a name used in history for the region on the Indus [which is coterminous to Pakistan] does not mean you are the same. I mean in Europe they have a country called 'Romania'. If you used Gangoo logic would it mean Romania is the successor state to Ancient Roman Empire? Just to clarify today Rome is called Italy and the name 'Rome' is restricted to the capital of that country.
If we wait few years then this will shift to claiming the Vedics. Or did you already have?
