What's new

Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

There was a red line and the Syrian regime crossed it many times. In cases like Syria is where a revolution is warranted (and needed) but most Arab countries are not like Syria in that respect. Are there any gulf countries or North African ones that allow criminal, sectarian gangs roam free to kill, steal, and rape wherever they like? No. This was only done by the barbaric Assad regime. Is the Egyptian government responding to insurgency with un-proportionate and indiscriminate bombing? No, I don't think so. Syria is an outlier. My breaking point (where I would join a revolution) is if my government is doing those above things. Otherwise, at least for me, this revolution business sounds a lot like shooting myself in the foot, counterproductive.

Please excuse my late response, I just saw a huge *** spider in my room which I had to promptly hunt down and kill or I'd have nightmares for the night (probably still will lol)

Of course the Syrian regime is an exception here. My point is that most regimes in the region are despotic (too various degrees obviously) and I find most of them counterproductive to the progress that I want to see in the region. I have written throughout the entire debate that a peaceful transition is obviously the preferred option but sometimes this is not possible. You have to fight for your rights. Other than that I think that we don't disagree that much and I think that I have written too much about this topic already, lol.

Did it look like this?



:lol:
 
Of course the Syrian regime is an exception here. My point is that most regimes in the region are despotic (too various degrees obviously) and I find most of them counterproductive to the progress that I want to see in the region. I have written throughout the entire debate that a peaceful transition is obviously the preferred option but sometimes this is not possible. You have to fight for your rights. Other than that I think that we don't disagree that much and I think that I have written too much about this topic already, lol.

Did it look like this?



:lol:
More like this actually.. And very fast.. Why do they even exist? Lol
image.jpg


Also: anti roach spray does NOT work on spiders, nor does hitting them with a blunt object for six times. Getting off topic lol. I'll stop.
 
First of allm there are some Alawi villages in Hama, Homs and Idlib which were heavily affected + Alawi areas in Damascus.
Secondly, the casualty rate among the Alawis is much higher than among the Sunnis in Syria.

BS about the casualty rate. Perhaps relatively.
 
Eid mubarak to everyone, do you remember the 'massacre' of Ishtabraq ?

#Idlib: Twenty-Six Alawite Civilians were Exchanged with Some Female Detainees
CJbhxzbUYAAaPQY.jpg

Summary :
The National Defence Forces (NDF) and Jabhat Ansar Al-Deen have exchanged hostages a week ago, twenty-six Alawite civilians from the village of Ishtabraq were let free, including children, women and elders after Jabhat Ansar Al-Deen had refused to let them leave the village before.
Jabhat Ansar Al-Deen (along with Jabhat Al-Nusra), are supposed to be the worst allies. I personally don't support any of them, in case anyone wonders what would they do to Alawite civilians if they fall in their hands, this may help you.

Back then, when they got into Ishtabraq, Assad's men fled with some civilians and the others were left behind, the state TV alleged that they 'killed' the children, 'tortured' the women, and 'massacred' everyone who was left behind, I've posted a single image which showed some children while there was a video in which Jabhat Ansar Al-Deen replied to the regime :

#Rewind: Terrorists While 'Torturing' the Alawite Children in Ishtabraq
- April 28th, 2015
You don't even need to read anything, it's easy to figure out whether a child is scared.
There are so many massacres committed by the regime, compare it to the Houla massacre, for example :

Terrorists make the Alawite children smile in 2015, while the moderate regime scared the Sunni children that they got their trousers wet (if you had seen the photos | videos) and killed them in 2012.
Or compare it to Aisha, the 5-year-old tissue seller who panicked when she saw a Turkish policeman for thinking he is a 'resister' (here).
Making Alawite children smile is terrorism, killing Sunni children is 'resistance'.
I found this while I was reading about Shiite Islam yesterday :
Imam Ali's (AS) last will to his sons Imam Hasan (AS) and Imam Hussain (AS) following a fatal blow on his head during morning prayers by Ibn Muljim (A Kharijite):
My advice to you is to be conscious of Allah and steadfast in your religion. Do not yearn for the world, and do not be seduced by it. Do not resent anything you have missed in it. Proclaim the truth; work for the next world. Oppose the oppressor and support the oppressed.

Source: Shia.Org
That's unlike :
EEEEEE.jpg

An oppressor is an old man who survives the barrel bomb attacks, or an old man who had lost few teeth while he was trying to eat the Shiite children, or the lost shrine.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@Saif al-Arab, whenever I leave for a while, I come back to see the Shiites debating whether Syrians, Iraqis, Lebanese, Egyptians..etc (and coming soon, Saudi Arabians) are Arabs or not, the only reason I could find so far is :
Less Arabs = Less Sayyids & Sayyidas = Less Khums
They just don't want to pay us any Khums. They'd rather give it to the wannabe Papa Smurf :p:.

However, I hope you stop taking part in racism, they aren't offending the Arabs and you aren't offending the Persians, the only people who got offended were the Africans (regardless of their faith, countries, age or gender). Although they won't tell you about it.

Does anyone have any idea who was @Jaws of the Lion ?, why did they ban him ?
Could it be @Syrian Lion with another account ?, maybe .
 
Jaws of the Lion knew English better than Syrian Lion (from what I remember,) and Syrian lion isn't banned so I don't see why he would make another account.

Infographic on the killing of civilians in Syria (In Ramadan):
CKJmJbZVEAAjmej.jpg:large

1,320 killed by regime.
312 killed by ISIS.
29 killed by rebels.
20 killed by coalition.
8 killed by Kurds.
 
Last edited:
Jaws of the Lion knew English better than Syrian Lion (from what I remember,) and Syrian lion isn't banned so I don't see why he would make another account.

Infographic on the killing of civilians in Syria (In Ramadan):
CKJmJbZVEAAjmej.jpg:large

1,320 killed by regime.
312 killed by ISIS.
29 killed by rebels.
20 killed by coalition.
8 killed by Kurds.
Don't forget the side note that says any militant that SAA kill is considered a civilian.
 
@Antaréss

Excellent post as usual sister. I wish you and your family a blessed Eid al-Fitr and holidays and may we soon see peace in Syria. We should completely ignore the few Farsi trouble makers that meddle in Arab affairs that they have no clue about or business with. They are irrelevant too but this is the internet after all.
The reason why such issues are even discussed in the first place is because one of the uneducated clowns is disrespecting the peaceful community of Afro-Arabs that exist in the Arab world. Our African friends here who are either users or read this thread know what is going on.

Most genuine Shia Arabs, Arabs as non-Arabs know that the support for the Al-Assad butcher regime has nothing to do with religion but simple geopolitics. They should not even dare or attempt to link their motives to the actions of Ali ibn Abi Talib (ra).
 
Last edited:
Don't forget the side note that says any militant that SAA kill is considered a civilian.
This is strictly civilian death toll. If you want to debate with their claims, why don't you go on the ground? Not that you would be convinced at the suffering of people, anyway...
 
This is strictly civilian death toll. If you want to debate with their claims, why don't you go on the ground? Not that you would be convinced at the suffering of people, anyway...

Did you pull that civilian death toll out of the *** of a flying horse?
 
Jaws of the Lion knew English better than Syrian Lion (from what I remember,) and Syrian lion isn't banned so I don't see why he would make another account.

Infographic on the killing of civilians in Syria (In Ramadan):
CKJmJbZVEAAjmej.jpg:large

1,320 killed by regime.
312 killed by ISIS.
29 killed by rebels.
20 killed by coalition.
8 killed by Kurds.
Poor rebels didn't kill anyone I wonder why is that maybe because they use March mellow bullets.
 
Jaws of the Lion knew English better than Syrian Lion (from what I remember,) and Syrian lion isn't banned so I don't see why he would make another account.

Infographic on the killing of civilians in Syria (In Ramadan):
CKJmJbZVEAAjmej.jpg:large

1,320 killed by regime.
312 killed by ISIS.
29 killed by rebels.
20 killed by coalition.
8 killed by Kurds.

Source: Syrian 'Revolution' Assembly. :lol:
This infographic and its source is as credible as, let's say, toilet paper. It's only of use for 'rebel' propagandists on internet.

The funniest part is, innocent terrorists of Islamic Front, Nus-Rats and FSA have not killed one single civilian. Good guy "rebels". :lol:

This infographic is enough to know the credibility of the junk you tell me by quoting every single post of mine in this thread to say something.
 
Last edited:
Did you pull that civilian death toll out of the *** of a flying horse?
Well, if SNHR and LCC (people on the ground) are a flying horse, then yes, I did pull this out of a flying horse.

Poor rebels didn't kill anyone I wonder why is that maybe because they use March mellow bullets.
All killed by rebels were killed by shelling. Much better than Egyptian Army who slaughter civilians in Sinai for being "terrorists."

Source: Syrian 'Revolution' Assembly. :lol:
This infographic and its source is as credible as, let's say, toilet paper. It's only of use for 'rebel' propagandists on internet.

The funniest part is, innocent terrorists of Islamic Front, Nus-Rats and FSA have not killed one single civilian. Good guy "rebels". :lol:

This infographic is enough to know the credibility of the junk you tell me by quoting every single post of mine in this thread to say something.
Their source is the LCC and SNHR. People on the ground, like Syrians. The people you slaughter. Much more credible than glorious 100 million strong Hezbollah being defeated by 20 terrorists in Zabadani.
 
Their source is the LCC and SNHR. People on the ground, like Syrians. The people you slaughter. Much more credible than glorious 100 million strong Hezbollah being defeated by 20 terrorists in Zabadani.

Don't change the subject by bringing up lame jokes. First of all, operation for Zabadani is not over, SAA and Hezbollah are pounding terrorists in the city and starving them for now, since they refused to surrender, they don't want to lose much forces in a useless urban warfare, while they can break their morale by giving them a slow death. There is nowhere they can run to and they are being bombed until the last of them. And there is (or there was) at least 2000 of them in the city.

Secondly, yes, I actually gave your source more credit than it deserves, otherwise, even toilet paper is more credible.
 
Well, if SNHR and LCC (people on the ground) are a flying horse, then yes, I did pull this out of a flying horse.


All killed by rebels were killed by shelling. Much better than Egyptian Army who slaughter civilians in Sinai for being "terrorists."


Their source is the LCC and SNHR. People on the ground, like Syrians. The people you slaughter. Much more credible than glorious 100 million strong Hezbollah being defeated by 20 terrorists in Zabadani.

SOHR is anti-Assad propaganda. Some rat exile in London is your source? Come on.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom