What's new

Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

Firstly, can we just leave Ottoman empire out? Its history since 100 years now.

Secondly, dont worry Turks dont want war, we are trying to uphold the economic growth of the last years, a war is the last thing we need now, Syria is a Arab internal issue and can only be solved by themselves, any foreign involvement is going to destabilize it more as we have seen in the past.
Better this is a Syrian issue.. Leave Syria for Syrians.. If you do as what you say, then war wouldn't been this misraeable... Akp support to terrorists and funding them caused this mess... When will people understand that Syria is for Syrians only and no government on this earth has the right to intervene and/or invade Syria under whatever pretext... You want an end to terrorism.. Good then, stop supporting it and work with Syrians to restore peace and stability...

BTW when I said "you" I was not addressing you directly, it is just in general...
 
Better this is a Syrian issue.. Leave Syria for Syrians.. If you do as what you say, the way would have not been this misraeable... Akp support to terrorists and funding them caused this mess... When will people understand that Syria is for Syrians only and no government on this earth has the right to intervene and invade Syria under whatever pretext... You want an end to terrorism.. Good then, stop supporting it and work with Syrians to restore peace and stability...

BTW when I said "you" I was not addressing you directly, it is just in general...
The usual bla bla we discussed a hundred times, seriously are you a bot trained to repeat the same over and over again, next time come up with a relevant reply or leave it pls.
 
The usual bla bla we discussed a hundred times, seriously are you a bot trained to repeat the same over and over again, next time come up with a relevant reply or leave it pls.
Because you people never learn that Syria is for Syrians only... Leave us alone...
And you are very sensitive... Or you get offended for no reason...
 
Because you people never learn that Syria is for Syrians only... Leave us alone...
And you are very sensitive... Or you get offended for no reason...
Not offended at all, just tired of reading the same empty phrases over and over again.
 
Over 40 regime forces and militants have been killed, 10s captured, 5 tanks and over 10 armored vehicles were destroyed when they were attacking Deir Maker, Hamrit, Habaria & Deir Adas in the Damascus countryside. Most of the casualties were Hezbollah.
May they fry in hell.

Rebels took some heavy losses too, b/c regime is using all sorts of munitions, including cluster bombs. CWs might be used soon. Because they're asshats.
 
And? Rebels only got serious funding early 2013. Assad got it from the start. Also, rebels need to feed their families too, or is it only Assad's militias that are allowed to get paid?

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/86e3f28e-be3a-11e2-bb35-00144feab7de.html#axzz3RB5fJXu2 this contradicts your first statement, lets not forget the radical and private individuals also funding and organising. The same sort of illusive guys that fund ISIS and its likes. American contractors in Iraq get paid to fight, they are also trying to feed their family then.
We should pity their poor souls! Can't gulfies give free aid (which is missing UN targets) so rebels "wouldn't have to fight for food" as you state. Opposition backers pay/help you if you fight for them. They have funds for warefare but not for altruism.
 
Last edited:
Over 40 regime forces and militants have been killed, 10s captured, 5 tanks and over 10 armored vehicles were destroyed when they were attacking Deir Maker, Hamrit, Habaria & Deir Adas in the Damascus countryside. Most of the casualties were Hezbollah.

Whenever rebels get a heavy beating, they always claim that they killed 'tens of Hezbollah members', which is a good indication that Hezbollah not only had very low casualties as always compared to rebels, but also they managed to kill lots of them because they are experts at it.

I remember last time when they said they have killed 40 Hezbollah members in Deraa and only thing they could show was a Hezbollah flag and days later, it was again revealed that tens of rebels were killed in various ambushes by Hezbollah in same area.

So, don't rely too much on rebel apologists, let's wait for a more clear view of the situation since both sides have decided not to publish much details on this battle.
 
rebels can also distinguish SAA from hezbollah from a distance.
 
Whenever rebels get a heavy beating, they always claim that they killed 'tens of Hezbollah members', which is a good indication that Hezbollah not only had very low casualties as always compared to rebels, but also they managed to kill lots of them because they are experts at it.

I remember last time when they said they have killed 40 Hezbollah members in Deraa and only thing they could show was a Hezbollah flag and days later, it was again revealed that tens of rebels were killed in various ambushes by Hezbollah in same area.

So, don't rely too much on rebel apologists, let's wait for a more clear view of the situation since both sides have decided not to publish much details on this battle.
BAHAHA
Rebels and activists are the most reliable sources.
You use the regime as "sources" even though they contradict themselves. They would say they never lost that position one day, then they would say the gained it the next, and on the third day, they lost it, and would still claim they had it. They also always lower the amount of deaths they have. Remember tabaqa and how the regime didn't say anything about it?
rebels can also distinguish SAA from hezbollah from a distance.
I guess the bodies of Hezbollah fighters with "Hezbollah" written on it and with Hezbollah ID's are not good enough for you.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/86e3f28e-be3a-11e2-bb35-00144feab7de.html#axzz3RB5fJXu2 this contradicts your first statement, lets not forget the radical and private individuals also funding and organising. The same sort of illusive guys that fund ISIS and its likes. American contractors in Iraq get paid to fight, they are also trying to feed their family then.
We should pity their poor souls! Can't gulfies give free aid (which is missing UN targets) so rebels "wouldn't have to fight for food" as you state. Opposition backers pay/help you if you fight for them. They have funds for warefare but not for altruism.
blah blah blah glorious SAA can only get paid rebels are terrorists fighting for money blah blah blah
Keep repeating the same stuff. You sound like a broken radio.
 
blah blah blah glorious SAA can only get paid rebels are terrorists fighting for money blah blah blah
Keep repeating the same stuff. You sound like a broken radio.

Lets see how far modern armies get without paying with staff. Only few countries can operate in such away. I'd also bet a police force ,which also bring law and order, built on a voluntary basis wouldn't hold up either.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom