What's new

Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

The failure to eliminate HTS two years ago is a major failure. Of course was one of the effects that led to failure is Turkey's wants to use FSA elements at the North . Turkish authorities were unable to afford the chaos in the Idlib region, while dealing with crucial national security issues in the Northern area. Of course, other gains were made, but the Gulf-based groups in the Idlib region resulted in further strengthening.

These days HTS propaganda accounts, seems to enter into a new manipulation operation over "traitor Turkey" slogans. Turkey has done its utmost to Idlib. Turkey sought to develop dialogue with all states involved in the Syrian issue to ensure peace in Idlib. However, AQlinked terrorist organizations were the ones who started a civil war in Idlib and killed thousands of FSA militantse while regime army advance in Hama and Aleppo. Again today, they are the main motivation of the regime army's Khan Sheikhun operation.

However, While some states that mentored HTS creating a more divided and more radical geography for the Syrian people, They do not want to miss this opportunity to destroy peace efforts of Turkey.
 
i fuk your resistance, why dont nobody take this people, why they flee from their own goverment, is that a resistance to imperials? no

see the twit series.


this chit doesnt belong to Turkey, it is belong to Europe, they wanted Qatari natural gas instead Russian gas. now we are facing 6 million refugies, Turkey need to open all west borders to send this guys to Europe asap.

Erdogan and Putin signed an agreement that Idlib will be a safe zone.

Then Putin broke this agreement and started mass slaughter of civilians.

Erdogan kissed Pution's bum and gave him 2.5 billion $ so he could slaughter more.

P.S. I am not talking that if Erdogan gave rebels light arms in 2011 the war would be spared.

Tweet from 2015, still relevant:

 
Idlib is one of the most risky military action without any major gain along Turkey's history.

Although it is not a priority for Turkey, Turkey has promised on behalf of organizations that have no control over. Organizations that targeted to be eliminated by astana trio, have weakened the organizations supported by Turkey, also has even been smashed same groups in many regions.

Turkey fell into this trap. while all actors, including Turkey hass accepted this organizations as a terrorists, Turkey has fallen into protective position adopted by terrorist organizations. In the face of an unclear compromise with the United States, Turkey has been subjected to warning attacks by Russia and its proxy. And now HTS trying something new..

With another perspective, it is understood that there is an implicit / allusive cooperation between the US and Russia to weaken Turkey and Iran's position in Syria.
 
Last edited:
Erdogan and Putin signed an agreement that Idlib will be a safe zone.

Then Putin broke this agreement and started mass slaughter of civilians.

Erdogan kissed Pution's bum and gave him 2.5 billion $ so he could slaughter more.

P.S. I am not talking that if Erdogan gave rebels light arms in 2011 the war would be spared.

Tweet from 2015, still relevant:

MORE PROPAGANDA FROM YOU.

Idlib is one of the most risky military action without any major gain along Turkey's history.

Although it is not a priority for Turkey, Turkey has promised on behalf of organizations that have no control over. Organizations that targeted to be eliminated by astana trio, have weakened the organizations supported by Turkey, also has even been smashed same groups in many regions.

Turkey fell into this trap. while all actors, including Turkey hass accepted this organizations as a terrorists, Turkey has fallen into protective position adopted by terrorist organizations. In the face of an unclear compromise with the United States, Turkey has been subjected to warning attacks by Russia and its proxy. And now HTS trying something new..

With another perspective, it is understood that there is an implicit / allusive cooperation between the US and Russia to weaken Turkey and Iran's position in Syria.
Interesting comments here. With regards to "weaken Iran's position in Syria", im afraid it cant be complete or/and it will only work in the short term. why do i say this? well from supporting Assad with precious lives and money, Iran has now "earned" the right to keep xx,xxx of troops/ ground soldiers in Syria and as long as those guys are there, i dont see Iran's influence in Syria decreasing. Ground troops are the ultimate victor in wars, so even Russia with all its equipment, doesnt have that many men on the ground in Syria. I suspect Turkey is distracted and isnt focused on any primary/main goals in Syria..
 
Idlib is one of the most risky military action without any major gain along Turkey's history.

Although it is not a priority for Turkey, Turkey has promised on behalf of organizations that have no control over. Organizations that targeted to be eliminated by astana trio, have weakened the organizations supported by Turkey, also has even been smashed same groups in many regions.

Turkey fell into this trap. while all actors, including Turkey hass accepted this organizations as a terrorists, Turkey has fallen into protective position adopted by terrorist organizations. In the face of an unclear compromise with the United States, Turkey has been subjected to warning attacks by Russia and its proxy. And now HTS trying something new..

With another perspective, it is understood that there is an implicit / allusive cooperation between the US and Russia to weaken Turkey and Iran's position in Syria.
In 2011 Syrians started to demonstrate against Assad. Assad slaughtered them. Erdogan threatened Assad but did nothing.

In 2012 Syrians took arms in their hands and captured most of the north themselves without any support. Erdogan could send arms and now Turkey would control Syria with zero effort. But he did not.

In 2013 Assad invited ISIS and Khamenai terrorists. Erdogan did nothing again.

As result now Syria is destroyed 13 million people slaughtered and ethnically cleansed. US, Iran and Russia control former Syrian territory. 4 million refugees in Turkey. Erdogan needs to beg Putin and US so they will allow him to do something.
 
Erdogan and Putin signed an agreement that Idlib will be a safe zone.

Then Putin broke this agreement and started mass slaughter of civilians.
if terrorists hand over their heavy weapons .they never agreed to that

In 2011 Syrians started to demonstrate against Assad. Assad slaughtered them. Erdogan threatened Assad but did nothing.
in 2011 the number of dead security forces was as high as dead protesters
In 2013 Assad invited ISIS
about rise of ISIS ask your friends in usa . it has something to do with some guy in usa administration say it was the darkest day of his life.
by the way Isis was FSA ally and was fighting SAA not FSA
 
if terrorists hand over their heavy weapons .they never agreed to that
1) Biggest terrorists in Syria are Assad Putin and Khamenai gangs.
2) Funny that u justify ethnic cleanings and slaughter of millions civilians just because did not move heavy weapons (what "heavy weapons" rebels have? - 3 and half captured tanks?).

On the other hand u whine that Israel made recon flights against Hezbollah which supposed to be fully disarmed according to cease fire agreement and UN resolution.

in 2011 the number of dead security forces was as high as dead protesters
Yes, Assadists slaughtered and tortured soldiers who refused to shot protestors.


about rise of ISIS ask your friends in usa . it has something to do with some guy in usa administration say it was the darkest day of his life.
by the way Isis was FSA ally and was fighting SAA not FSA
Here facts:

1) Assad was major sponsor of Iraqi Al Qaeda (which later became ISIS).
2) Assad provided massive air support to ISIS.
3) Russia encouraged its citizens to join ISIS.
 
1) Biggest terrorists in Syria are Assad Putin and Khamenai gangs.
2) Funny that u justify ethnic cleanings and slaughter of millions civilians just because did not move heavy weapons (what "heavy weapons" rebels have? - 3 and half captured tanks?).

On the other hand u whine that Israel made recon flights against Hezbollah which supposed to be fully disarmed according to cease fire agreement and UN resolution.
you never abide by UN resolution so you can't complain , Syria and SAA abide by the agreement

Yes, Assadists slaughtered and tortured soldiers who refused to shot protestors.
yeah , but the number belong to the ones died by peaceful protesters , there never was any number about the people who died in prison
 
you never abide by UN resolution
Thats not true. We abide all Security Coincil resolutions.

so you can't complain , Syria and SAA abide by the agreement
Assadists indiscriminately bomb civilians commiting war crimes on daily basis. There was not a single day in past 8 years + when they did not commit a war crime and terror.

They also arm Hezbollah breaking Security Council resolution

yeah , but the number belong to the ones died by peaceful protesters , there never was any number about the people who died in prison
Thats pure bullshit. Already in April 2011 Assad started to use tans. Syrians had not any arms then at all.

Assadists slaughtered soldiers who refused to shot or defected. And then claimed they are victims of protests.
 
Thats not true. We abide all Security Coincil resolutions.
which part ?
They also arm Hezbollah breaking Security Council resolution
Hezbpllah Arm come from somewhere else not Assad
Thats pure bullshit. Already in April 2011 Assad started to use tans. Syrians had not any arms then at all.

Assadists slaughtered soldiers who refused to shot or defected. And then claimed they are victims of protests.
sadly the reality was not that simple, if he used force the way you claim then uprising was silenced in 2-3 week
 
which part ?
ALl parts

Hezbpllah Arm come from somewhere else not Assad
Nasrallah openly said it comes from Syria.

sadly the reality was not that simple, if he used force the way you claim then uprising was silenced in 2-3 week
Thats what Assadists aka Khamenaists thought. They sent army to slaughter protesters, but result was the opposite: soldiers defected and demonstrations increased.

Then there was stage two: artillery and barrel bomb. Again opposite result.

Then was stage three (started in spring 2013 since Khamenaist invasion): scorched earth, genocide, ethnic cleansing. Over 13 million Muslim civilians kicked from homes and slaughtered by Khamenaists in order to keep an inbred atheist dictator on his throne.
 
hats what Assadists aka Khamenaists thought. They sent army to slaughter protesters, but result was the opposite: soldiers defected and demonstrations increased.

Then there was stage two: artillery and barrel bomb. Again opposite result.

Then was stage three (started in spring 2013 since Khamenaist invasion): scorched earth, genocide, ethnic cleansing. Over 13 million Muslim civilians kicked from homes and slaughtered by Khamenaists in order to keep an inbred atheist dictator on his throne.
wrong if bashar used forces as his father used the uprising wouldn't last even one month.

ALl parts
you mean no parts
 
Back
Top Bottom