Struggle of Kashmiris cannot be characterised as terrorism: Pakistani envoy tells UN

[priti]

Your argument is flawed . If its the punjabis and afghans who terrorize unarmed civilians (by killing them), then why do the Indians not allow the UN observers on their side of loc ? and why we see kashmiris protesting against the Indian govt. in srinagar , sometimes holding Pakistani flags (on news) ? Why we see Indian army using force against the locals ? Why human right commission reports violations of human rights by Indian army in Kashmir ? what are half a million Indian soldiers doing for decades in kashmir when the border is sealed for ten years at least?. there are a lot of such questions that arise if your claim is considered 

We took 34 % , we will take the remaining 45 % too . till then you can laugh

so if any country bombs you you will go to UN?

 

[Solomon2]

I am quit sure that you are aware that the Struggle of Kashmiri people is for their right of self determination which is align with UN charter and accepted by India in UN resolution regarding Kashmir...Pakistan support to their cause is in the sprit of brotherhood which is universally accepted Human Right -​

Incidents like 26/11 Mumbai - where the murderous "Kashmir resistance" was shown to be a Pakistani operation and creation - don't appear to fall under any exclusion; India would be justified under international law to initiate armed retaliation against terror organizations in Pakistan as a result.

Terror incidents in Kashmir itself may be a different story; however, your characterization of Kashmiris and their rights and obligations under U.N.S.C. Resolutions and international law is rather incomplete and your mischaracterization of Pakistani obligations is warped. Have you ever studied outside of Pakistan's biased school-approved curriculum to try to sort out the truth?

Any violation of International Borders by any state would be considered an illegal act under International Law.

That's one of the things UNSC 1373 changed. The Ambassador knows it. Why does he speak now, after five years? Perhaps it is a pre-emptive move - perhaps Pakistan has another 26/11 Mumbai in the works?​

 

[qamar1990]

india has never supported terrorism in any country.paksitan is the root cause of Islamic terror.
paksitan has higher per capita aids infected people.

pakistani has higher per capita aids? lmfao did you pull that one out of your arse?

 

[PlanetWarrior]

Incidents like 26/11 Mumbai - where the murderous "Kashmir resistance" was shown to be a Pakistani operation and creation - don't appear to fall under any exclusion; India would be justified under international law to initiate armed retaliation against terror organizations in Pakistan as a result.

Terror incidents in Kashmir itself may be a different story; however, your characterization of Kashmiris and their rights and obligations under U.N.S.C. Resolutions and international law is rather incomplete and your mischaracterization of Pakistani obligations is warped. Have you ever studied outside of Pakistan's biased school-approved curriculum to try to sort out the truth?

That's one of the things UNSC 1373 changed. The Ambassador knows it. Why does he speak now, after five years? Perhaps it is a pre-emptive move - perhaps Pakistan has another 26/11 Mumbai in the works?​

"They will plot and plan but Allah knows best and surely He is the best plotter and planner of them all" ...They don't seem to realize that after 26/11 the TTP became the biggest monster that they ever faced. Was this as a result of the plotting and planning of Allah against the infidel Pakistanis ? I think so. Yet they continue plotting and planning

 

[qamar1990]

We're about to become the country with most head counts, why are you comparing your small country with ours?

you lied earlier, you claimed that pakistan had more per capita hiv then india, clearly you had pulled that out of your as s.
pakistan is a small country, and this small country has your huge piece of sh it nation shivering

 

[karan.1970]

you lied earlier, you claimed that pakistan had more per capita hiv then india, clearly you had pulled that out of your as s.
pakistan is a small country, and this small country has your huge piece of sh it nation shivering

And that misplaced feeling of false self grandeur makes you sleep better ?

 

[HRK]

Incidents like 26/11 Mumbai - where the murderous "Kashmir resistance" was shown to be a Pakistani operation and creation - don't appear to fall under any exclusion;​

Correction in my dear don't know how you are claiming 26/11 militants as Kashmiri resistance, neither they claimed nor any Kashmiri group, all we have is one version of the story .... secondly how one could term it as 'Pakistani operation' & ignoring the involvement of Indian citizens at planing and executional level of that incidents ..... what are the investigation in this direction is yet to be known ....

India would be justified under international law to initiate armed retaliation against terror organizations in Pakistan as a result.

Pls quote that law/s if there is any ..... ??

Have you ever studied outside of Pakistan's biased school-approved curriculum to try to sort out the truth?

Same question could be tossed towards you my dear .....have you studied any un-biased literature covering all aspects of under discussion matter .... My Dear World does not begins from Washington and ends at Delhi ....

That's one of the things UNSC 1373 changed.

Would like to know precisely where Pakistan has violated that resolution or any of that clause .....

The Ambassador knows it. Why does he speak now, after five years? Perhaps it is a pre-emptive move - perhaps Pakistan has another 26/11 Mumbai in the works?

If you can not understand 'Why now' then my dear you need to learn a lot about south Asia's politics ..... I would not termed you as a conspiracy theorist, but you have shown all the symptoms .....​